Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:32:18.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermoluminescence Determinations on Early Ceramic Materials from Coastal Southern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher E. Drover
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92502
R. E. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92502
Thomas Cairns
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Los Angeles, CA
Jonathon E. Ericson
Affiliation:
Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

Abstract

Radiocarbon determinations on marine shell have previously been used to provide evidence assigning a fourth to sixth millennium B.C. age to ceramic objects excavated at the Irvine site, an early Archaic period shell midden located in coastal southern California. Objections have been raised concerning the reliability of the stratigraphic association of ceramics and the radiocarbon-dated marine shell materials. An examination of the thermoluminescence responses of two ceramic samples resulted in minimum TL ages of ca. 1500 B.C. Evidence for a presumably indigenous California ceramic tradition may also be present at two additional sites. This suggests that the arrival of ceramic forms into southern and central California by way of the southern Great Basin and Colorado River may be seen as a separate, comparatively recent [ca. A.D. 1000] phenomenon.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aitken, M. J., and Alldred, J. C. 1972 The assessment of error limits in thermoluminescent dating. Archaeometry 14:257267.Google Scholar
Bell, W. T. 1976 The assessment of the radiation dose-rate in thermoluminescence dating. Archaeometry 18:107111.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Taylor, R. E., and Libby, W. F. 1966 Radiocarbon content of marine shells from the California and Mexican west coast. Science 153:863866.Google Scholar
Cairns, T. 1976 Archaeological dating by thermoluminescence. Analytical Chemistry 48:266274.Google Scholar
Carriveau, G. W. 1974 Annealing threshold and thermoluminescence dating of ceramic material. MASCA Newsletter 10:113.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B. 1958 University of Michigan radiocarbon dates III. Science 128:11171123.Google Scholar
Drover, C. E. 1971 Three fired-clay figurines from 4-Ora-64, Orange County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 7(4):4549.Google Scholar
Drover, C. E. 1973 Early ceramics from coastal southern California. Paper presented at the 1973 annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Drover, C. E. 1975 Early ceramics from coastal southern California. Journal of California Anthropology 2:101107.Google Scholar
Drover, C. E. 1978 Prehistoric ceramic objects from Catalina Island. Journal of California Anthropology, in Press.Google Scholar
Drover, C. E., and Spain, J. N. 1972 An early articulated inhumation from 4-Ora-64, a discussion. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 8:3544.Google Scholar
Handy, J. L., and Gaines, A. M. 1975 The thermal behavior of clay sand: possible methods of determining firing temperature of pottery. MASCA Newsletter 11:34.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, J. G. 1938a Natural magnetism of rocks and their age, part I. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 43:119127.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, J. G. 1938b Natural magnetism of rocks and their age, part II. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 43:299320.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1955 Eladiocarbon dating (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lister, R. H. 1953 The stemmed, indented base point, a possible horizon marker. American Antiquity 18:264265.Google Scholar
Olson, E. 1958 The problem of sample contamination in radiocarbon dating. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Departmentof Earth Sciences, Columbia University. Google Scholar
Ragir, S. 1972 The early horizon in central California prehistory. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility Vol. 15. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K., Michael, H. N., and Hann, E. C. 1973 Radiocarbon dates and reality. MASCA Newletter 9:119.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. J. 1936 Yuman pottery making. San Diego Museum Papers 2:153.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. J. 1945 An outline of Yuman prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 1:167198.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1970 Bristlecone-pine calibration of radiocarbon time scale 5200 B. C. to the present. In Eladiocarbon variationsand absolute chronology, edited by Olsson, I. U., pp. 303309. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1976 The carbon-14 level during the fourth and second half of the fifth millennium B. C. , and the carbon-14calibration curve. Paper presented at the IX International Radiocarbon Conference, June 20-26, 1976, Los Angeles and San Diego, California. Google Scholar
Tanner, A. B. 1964 Radon migration in the ground. In The natural radiation environment, edited by Adams, J. A. S. and Lowder, W. M., pp. 265295. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1970 Chronological problems in west Mexican archaeology: an application of the dating systems approachin archaeologial research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1979 UCR radiocarbon dates III. Radiocarbon, in preparation.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E., and Berger, R. 1967 Radiocarbon content of marine shells from the Pacific coasts of Central and South America. Science 158:11801182.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E., and Berger, R. 1968 Radiocarbon dating of the organic portion of ceramic wattle-and-daub house construction materialsof low carbon content. American Antiquity 33:363366.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E., and Slota, P. 1978 Fraction studies on marine shell and bone samples from radiocarbon analyses. In Advances inradiocarbon dating. Proceedings of the IX International Radiocarbon Conference, Berkeley. University of California Press, in Press.Google Scholar
Thellier, E., and Thellier, M. 1951 Properties magnetiques des terres cuites et des rockes. Journal de Physics et Radium 12:205218.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. J. 1954 The little Sycamore site and the early millingstone cultures of southern California. American Antiquity 20:112123.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. J. 1955 A suggested chronology for southern California coastal archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214230.Google Scholar
Warren, C. N. 1967 The San Dieguito complex: a review and hypothesis. American Antiquity 32:168185.Google Scholar
Warren, C. N. 1968 Cultural transition and ecological adaptation on the southern California coast. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3):114.Google Scholar
Warshaw, C. M, and Roy, R. 1961 Classification and a scheme for the identification of layer silicates. Geological Society of America Bulletin 72:14551492.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. W. 1971 Uranium distributions in archaeologic ceramics: dating of radioactive inclusions. Science 174:818819.Google Scholar