Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:17:33.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supplementary Data on Early Man in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Hans E. Fischel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

E. H. Sellards’ recent paper, Early Man in America, was intended to be an index to all localities in which human remains are reported to have been found associated with extinct animals or in deposits that appear to be of an age equivalent to those that elsewhere contain extinct animals. The author states that some localities doubtless have been overlooked that should have been included.

It so happens that prior to writing the Folsom paper to which Sellards refers, I had outlined a general discussion of Early Man in America. In so doing I came across a considerable part of the literature which was never reproduced in the abbreviated Folsom paper as published. A check with Sellards’ paper allows me to add the following sites for which the same reservation holds which Sellards made, insofar as some of these sites might not meet the requirements of bona fide antiquity.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1941 , pp. 346 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, W. M. 1897. Aboriginal Chipped Stone Implements in New York. New York State Museum, Bulletin 16.Google Scholar
Brown, Calvin S. 1926. Archaeology of Mississippi. Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1903. Mastodons of New York. New York State Museum, Bulletin 69.Google Scholar
Claypole, E. W. 1896. “Human Relics in the Drift of Ohio.” American Geologist. Google Scholar
Fischel, H. E. 1939. “Folsom and Yuma Culture Finds.” American Antiquity, Vol. 4, pp. 232–232.Google Scholar
Fowke, G. 1891–92. Stone Art. Bureau of American Ethnology, 13th Annual Report.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R. 1933. Gypsum Cave. Southwest Museum Papers, No. 8.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1893. “Traces of Glacial Man in Ohio.” Journal of Geology, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Howard, E. B. 1935. “Evidence of Early Man in North America.” Pennsylvania University Museum Journal, Vol. 24, Nos. 2-3, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Jenks, A. E. 1935. “Field Work in Minnesota During 1934.” American Antiquity, Vol. 1, No. 2.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. R. 1938. A Preliminary Report on Archaeological Excavations at Macon, Georgia. Bulletin 119, Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar
Kuhm, H. W. 1934. “The Folsom Point Controversy.” Wisconsin Archaeologist, Vol. 14, No. 2.Google Scholar
McGee, W. J. 1895. “Man and the Glacial Period.” American Anthropologist, O. S., Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1900. Prehistoric Implements. Google Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1904. The Exploration of Jacob's Cavern, McDonald County, Missouri. Bulletin 1, Department of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, Mass.Google Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1931. Archaeology of the Arkansas River Valley. New Haven.Google Scholar
Owen, L. A. 1907. “A Palaeolithic Implement From the Loess.” Records of the Past, Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Ray, C. N. 1935. “The Pottery Complex and Artifacts of the Abilene Region.” Bulletin 7, Texas Archeological and Paleontological Society, Abilene.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1940. “Early Man in America.” Geological Society of America, Bulletin 51, pp. 373–373.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1862. “Physical Ethnology.” Smithsonian Report, Pt. III. Art Traces.Google Scholar
Witte, A. H. 1935. “Archaeology of a Section of the Red River Upper Drainage.” Bulletin 7, Texas Archeological and Paleontological Society, Abilene.Google Scholar
Wright, G. F. 1895. “New Evidence of Glacial Man in Ohio.” Popular Science Monthly, December.Google Scholar