Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:52:24.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Spirit in the Material: A Case Study of Animism in the American Southwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christine S. VanPool
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211
Elizabeth Newsome
Affiliation:
Department of Visual Arts, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

Abstract

People often imbue their surroundings, including tools, with a “life essence” that makes them active objects. A growing number of archaeologists are beginning to study how such “living” beings impact human behavior. These archaeologists use the term “object agency,” but employ many different ontologicai approaches. We explore this variation, and present a framework comparing different ontologicai models archaeologists use. We adopt an animistic perspective, and evaluate its applicability to the Southwest using ethnographic and archaeological data. We further propose that it is applicable throughout the New World. Puebloan potters consider pots living beings with a spiritual essence that is affected by and that impacts humans. Pottery manufacture is a mutual negotiation between the potter and the clay to create a “Made Being” with its own spiritual and material aspects. We conclude that a similar ontology is reflected in effigy pots and globular jars from the Casas Grandes region. Ultimately we conclude that this perspective provides useful insights into the placement, decoration, and discard of many vessels that have puzzled Southwestern archaeologists for decades.

Resumen

Resumen

Con frecuencia la gente impregna su medio ambiente, incluyendo sus herramientas, con una “esencia vital“ que los convierte en objetos activos. Un número creciente de arqueólogos están comenzando a estudiar cómo tales seres “vivientes“ afectan el comportamiento humano. Estos arqueólogos usan el término “objeto agencia,“ pero usan muchos enfoques ontológicos. Nosotros exploramos esta variación y presentamos un marco comparativo de los diferentes modelos ontológicos que los arqueólogos usan. Adoptamos una perspectiva animista y evaluamos su aplicabilidad al Suroeste usando datos etnográficos y arque-alógicos. Además proponemos que es aplicable a lodo el Nuevo Mundo. Alfareros Pueblo consideran sus vasijas como seres vivientes con una esencia espiritual que es afectada por y que impacta a los humanos. La fabricación de alfarería es una nego-dación mutua entre el alfarero y la arcilla para crear un “Ser Hecho “el cual tiene sus propios aspectos espirituales y mate-ríales. Concluimos que una ontologia similar es reflejada en vasijas efigie y jarras globulares de la región de Casas Grandes. Finalmente concluimos que este enfoque provee perspectivas útiles sobre la distribución, decoración, y abandono de muchas vasijas que han sido un enigma para los arqueólogos del Suroeste por décadas.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Benjamin, Alberti, and Bray, Tamara L. 2009 Introduction: Special Section: Animating Archaeology: of Subjects, Objects and Alternative Ontologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19:337343.Google Scholar
Robert Plant, Armstrong 1971 The. Affecting Presences: An Essay in Humanistic An thropology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
Byrd, Baylor 1972 When Clay Sings. Aladdin Paperbacks, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217225.Google Scholar
Nurit, Bird-David 1999 “Animism” Revisited: On Personhood, Environment and Relational Epistemology. Current Anthropology 40:S67S91.Google Scholar
Nancy, Bonvillain 2001 Native Nations: Cultures and Histories of Native North America. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Brody, J.J., and Swentzell, Rina 1996 To Touch the Past: The Painted Pottery of the Mimbres People. Hudson Hill Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, Linda A., and Walker, William H. 2008 Prologue: Archaeology, Animism and Non-Human Agents. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15:297299.Google Scholar
Bunzel, Ruth L. 1972[1929] The Pueblo Potter: A Study of Creative Imagination in Primitive Art. Dover" Publications, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Bunzel, Ruth L. 1992[1932] Zuni Ceremonialism: Three Case Studies, by Ruth L. Bunzel. University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Frank Hamilton, Cushing 1886 A Study of Pueblo Pottery as Illustrative of Zuñi Culture Growth. Fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 1882–83, pp. 467522. Smithsonian Institution, Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Di Peso, Charles. C. 1974 Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca, Vol. 1–3 The Medio Period. The Amerind Foundation, Dragoon, and Northland Press, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Di Peso, Charles C., Rinaldo, John. B., Fenner, Gloria. J. (editors) 1974 Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Grand Chichimeca, Vols. 4–7. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon and Northland Press, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Dittert, Alfred E., and Plog, Fred 1980 Generations in Clay: Pueblo Pottery of the American Southwest. Northland" Publishing in Cooperation with the American Federations of Arts, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T.J., Dongoske, Kurt E., and Kuwanwisiwma, Leigh J. 2001 Hopi Perspectives on Southwestern Mortuary Studies. In Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspectives, edited by Douglas R. Mitchell and Judy L. Brunson-Hadley, pp. 926. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Henri, Focillon 1989 The Life of Forms in Art. Zone Books, New York.Google Scholar
Larry, Frank, and Harlow, Francis H. 1990 Historic Pottery of the Pueblo Indians: 1600–1880. Schiffer" Publishing Ltd., West Chester, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
David, Freidel, Schele, Linda, and Parker, Joy 1993 Maya Cosmos: Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path. Quill William Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
Alfred, Gell 1998 Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marvin, Harris 1989 Our Kind: Who We Are, Where We Came From, Where We Are Going. Harper and Row," Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Graham, Harvey 2006 Animism: Respecting the Living World. Columbia University Press. New York.Google Scholar
Martin, Holbraad 2009 Ontology, Ethnography, Archaeology: An Afterword on the Ontography of Things. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19:431441.Google Scholar
Houlihan, Patrick T. 1980 Introduction. In Generations in Clay: Pueblo Pottery of the American Southwest, by Alfred E. Dittert, and Fred Plog, pp. 13. Northland" Publishing in Cooperation with the American Federations of Arts, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Timothy, Ingold 2006 Rethinking the Animate, Re-Animating Thought. Ethnos 71:920.Google Scholar
Ladd, Edmund J. 2000 The Zuni Ceremonial System. In Kachinas In the Pueblo World, edited by Polly Schaafsma, pp. 1722. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Louise, Lamphere 1983 Southwestern Ceremonialism. In Southwest, edited by Alfonso Ortiz, pp. 743763. Handbook of North of American Indians, Vol. 10, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington. D.C. Google Scholar
Chris, Loendorf 2001 Salado Burial Practices. In Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspectives, edited by Douglas R. Mitchell and Judy L. Brunson-Hadley, pp. 123148. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Hayley, Logeson 2009 Ceramic Hand Drums and their Role in Funerary Processions at Paquimé. Poster presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Roger Ivar, Lohmann 2003 The Supernatural Is Everywhere: Defining Qualities of Religion in Melanesia and Beyond. Anthropological Forum 13:175185.Google Scholar
Bronislaw, Malinowski 1948 Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara J., and Ferguson, T. J. 2008 Animate Objects: Shell Trumpets and Ritual Networks in the Greater Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15:338361.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Douglas R., and Brunson-Hadley, Judy L. 2001 Introduction. In Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspectives, edited by Douglas R Mitchell, and Judy L. Brunson-Hadley, pp. 18. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Moro, Pamela A., Myers, James E., and Lehmann, Arthur C. 2008 Introduction and Introductory paragraphs. In Magic, Witchcraft, and Religion: Anthropological Study of the Supernatural. edited by Pamela A. Moro, James. E. Myers, and Arthur C. Lehmann, p. 15, 16. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Alfonso, Ortiz 1969 The Tewa World: The Tewa World: Space, Time, Being and Becoming in a Pueblo Society. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Elsie Clews, Parsons 1996 Pueblo Indian Religion Volumes 1 and 2. Bison Books, University of Nebraska Press, London, reprint of 1939" publication.Google Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M. 2006 Ramos Negro: The Black Sheep of the Chihuahuan Wares. Pottery Southwest 25:1014.Google Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M. 2009 Ancestors and Elites: Emergent Complexity and Ritual Practices in the Casas Grandes Polity. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M., and Buikstra, Jane E. 2008 Feather Waving or The Numinous?: Archaeological Perspectives on Ritual, Religion, and Ideology. In An Archaeological Perspective on Ritual, Religion, and Ideology from American Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity, compiled by Gordon F. M. Rakita and Jane E. Buikstra, pp. 117. The SAA Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Ravesloot, John C. 1988 Mortuary Practices and Social Differentiation at Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 49. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Ravesloot, John C. 1994 Burial Practices in the Livingston Area. In Archaeology of the Salado in the Livingston Area of Tonto Basin, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Livingston Management Group, Pinto Creek Complex, edited by David Jacobs, pp. 833850. Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 3, Anthropological Field Studies No. 32. OCRM, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Schaafsma, Curtis F., and Riley, Carroll L. 1999 The Casas Grandes World. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Emory, Sekaquaptewa, and Washburn, Dorothy 2004 They Go along Singing: Reconstructing the Hopi past from Ritual Metaphors in Song and Image. American Antiquity 69:457486.Google Scholar
Leslie Marmon, Silko 1996 Landscape, History, and the Pueblo Imagination. In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, edited by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, pp. 264275. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
Rina, Swentzell 1997 Clay. In The Serpent’s Tongue: Pose, Poetry, and Art of the New Mexico Pueblos, edited by Nancy Wood, p. 203. Dutton books, New York.Google Scholar
Townsend, Richard F. 2005 Casas Grandes in the Art of the Ancient Southwest. In Casas Grandes and the Ceramic Art of the Ancient South west, edited by Richard F. Townsend, pp. 1465. The Art Institute of Chicago and Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G. 1989 A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stephen, Trimble 2004 Talking With the Clay: The Art of Pueblo Pottery. 4th ed. School of Advance Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1871 Primitive Culture. J.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., and VanPool, Todd L. 2002 Dichotomy and Duality: The Structure of Casas Grandes Art. In Talking Birds, Plumed Serpents, and Painted Women: The Ceramics of Casas Grandes, edited by J. Stur, pp. 7175. Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block, Tucson.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., and VanPool, Todd L. 2006 Gender in Middle Range Societies: A Case Study in Casas Grandes Iconography. American Antiquity 71:5375.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., and VanPool, Todd L. 2007 Signs of the Casas Grandes Shamans. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., VanPool, Todd L., and Harmon, Marcel J. 2008 Plumed and Horned Serpents of the American Southwest. In Touching the Past: Ritual, Religion, and the Trade of Casas Grandes, edited by Glenna Nielsen-Grim and Paul Stavast, pp. 4758. Museum of Peoples and Culture, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Walker, William H., and MaGahee, G. 2001 Animated Waters: The Ritualized Life History of Wells, Reservoirs, and Springs at Casas Grandes, Chihuahua. Paper presented at 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Whitley, David S. 2001 Science and the Sacred: Interpretive Theory in U.S. Rock Art Research. In Theoretical Perspectives in Rock Art Research, edited by Knut Helsko, pp. 124151. Instuttet for Sammenlignende Kultuforskning, Oslo.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R. 1999 A Preliminary Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Access Relationships at Casas Grandes. In The Casas Grandes World, edited by Curtis F. Schaafsma and L. Carroll Riley, pp. 93104. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Young, M. Jane 1988 Signs from the Ancestors: Zuni Cultural Symbolism and Perceptions of Rock Art. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Maria Nieves, Zedeño 2009 Animating by Association: Index Objects and Relational Taxonomies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(3):407417.Google Scholar