Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:45:20.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Analysis of Occupation Floors II: The Application of Nearest Neighbor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert Whallon Jr.
Robert Whallon Jr.*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan,Museum of Anthropology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The statistical method of nearest neighbor analysis is presented for the study of distributional patterns of artifacts over occupation floors. It is compared with the previously presented method of dimensional analysis of variance. Nearest neighbor analysis is found to be much more sensitive in its detection of non-random spatial clustering. It has the advantage of not being particularly limited in application by problems of size or shape of the area under study, although it does require coordinates for each artifact and cannot be applied when only counts per grid unit are known. On the other hand, nearest neighbor analysis encounters considerable problems in defining the artifact clusters on an area and in comparing the distributions of several artifact types. These problems severely limit the utility of nearest neighbor analysis at the moment. Dimensional analysis of variance handles them better.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 16 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, Philip J., and Evans, Francis C. 1954 Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.Google Scholar
Dacey, Michael F. 1963 Order neighbor statistics for a class of random patterns in multidimensional space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 53:505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, Philip H. 1965 An introduction to psychological statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1959 The use of point-to-plant distances in the study of the pattern of plant populations. Journal of Ecology 47:607–613.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1960 A single mechanism to account for regular, random and aggregated populations. Journal of Ecology 48:575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1969 An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Sokol, Robert R., and Sneath, Peter H. 1963 Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co. Google Scholar
Thompson, H. R. 1956 Distribution of distance to nth neighbor in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37:391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whallon, Robert Jr., 1973 Spatial analysis of occupation floors I: the application of dimensional analysis of variance. American Antiquity 38:266–278.Google Scholar