Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:59:13.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Remarks on the Study of Prehistoric Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Slavomil Vencl
Slavomil Vencl*
Affiliation:
Československá Akademie Véd, Archeologicky Ustav Praha, Letenská 4 (Czechoslovakia)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present article responds to questions raised by Marshall (1969). Based on European material, the author concludes that engineering principles cannot be universally applied, despite some obviously positive results. Before reconstructing an object, the completeness of its preserved remains should be taken into account and the preserved floor plan should be supplemented with those elements that have vanished. To use only what actually remains of a house floor in making a reconstruction presupposes that the layout is fully preserved, and this is of course not always the case. The English version of this paper was translated from the original Czech manuscript by H. Martin Wobst, University of Michigan.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 1971 , pp. 451 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borkovský, Ivan 1965 Levý Hradec. Nejstarší sídlo Přemyslovcu Nakladatelství Československé akademie ved, Praha.Google Scholar
Buttler, W., and Haberey, W. 1936 Die bandkeramische Ansiedlung bei Köln-Lindenthal. Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 11.Google Scholar
Felgenhauer, F. 1960 Bandkeramische Grossbauten aus Mannswörth bei Wien. Archaeologia Austriaca 27:1–10.Google Scholar
Guyan, W. U. (Editor) 1955 Das Pfahlbauproblem. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
Kiekebusch, A. 1910 Die Ausgrabung eines bronzezeitlichen Dorfes bei Buch in der Nähe von Berlin. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 2:371–406.Google Scholar
Marshall, James A. 1969 Engineering principles and the study of prehistoric structures: a substantive example. American Antiquity 34:166–171.Google Scholar
Modderman, P. J. R. 1959 Die bandkeramische Siedlung von Sittard. Palaeohistoria VI-VII:33–120. Groningen 1958–1959.Google Scholar
Motyková-Šneidrová, K. 1959 Kovolitecká dilna v laténské osadě u Libochovic. Archeologickě rozhledy 11:181–192.Google Scholar
Rataj, J. 1966 Habitat à Opatovice nad Labem (Bohéme). Investigations archéologiques en Tchéco-slovaquie, pp. 149–150. Academia, Praha. Google Scholar
Řihovský, J. 1966 Lovčičky, habitat des champs d'urnes du Moyen Danube (Moravie). Investigations archéologiques en Tchécoslovaquie pp. 168–169. Academia, Praha.Google Scholar
Schlette, F. 1958 Die ältesten Haus- und Siedlungsformen des Menschen. Ethnographisch-archäologische Forschungen 5:1–185, P1. 1–93.Google Scholar
Schuchhardt, C. 1909 Die Romerschanze bei Potsdam. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 1:209–238.Google Scholar
Soudský, B. 1966 Bylany. Osada nejstaršlích zemědšcu z mladšlí doby kamenné. Nakladatelství Čleskoslovenské akademie věd, Praha.Google Scholar
Vencl, Sl. 1966 Text interpretační přesnosti. Unpublished manuscript in author's files.Google Scholar
Vencl, Sl. 1968 Kotázce interpretace pravěkcých staveb. Archeologické rozhledy 20:490–510.Google Scholar