Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:25:21.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Network Analysis of Early Classic Hohokam Corporate Group Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthew C. Pailes
Matthew C. Pailes*
Affiliation:
School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Network analysis provides a unique approach for archaeologists to identify structural relationships between the emergent properties of social interactions and the trajectory of corporate groups. This article presents the results of a survey of architectural features and a network analysis of walkways between house clusters at the thirteenth-century Hohokam site of Cerro Prieto, located in the Tucson Basin, Arizona. Statistical measures suggest that nascent inequality was developing at this site, making it an excellent case study of the factors that led to the emergence of economic and social differentiation. Network analysis provides a means to explain how corporate groups were able to leverage social connections in their struggle for ascendance in these spheres of interaction. Regardless of the strategy of social ascendance, a simple increase in the opportunity to influence others appears to explain a large portion of differential corporate group success.

El análisis de red proporciona un enfoque único para los arqueólogos que buscan identificar relaciones estructurales entre las propiedades emergentes de interacción social y la trayectoria de individuos o grupos corporativos. Este reporte presenta los resultados de prospección de elementos arquitectónicos y el análisis de red de senderos entre grupos habitacionales en un sitio Hohokam del siglo XIII llamado Cerro Prieto, localizado en la cuenca de Tucson, Arizona. Para este sitio, las medidas estadίsticas sugieren desigualdad emergente, haciéndolo un caso de estudio ideal para el entendimiento sobre losfactores que conducen a la diferenciación económica y social. El análisis de red proporciona un medio para explicar como las unidades domésticas podían hacer uso para su ventaja de las conexiones sociales en su lucha por dominio en las esferas de interacción. A pesar de la estrategia empleada para obtener dominio social, un pequeño incremento en la oportunidad para influenciar a otros, parece explicar una gran parte del éxito diferencial entre estas unidades domésticas.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 465 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abbott, David R. 2000 Ceramics and Community Organization among the Hohokam. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Abbott, David R. 2006 Hohokam Ritual and Economic Transformation: Ceramic Evidence from the Phoenix Basin, Arizona. The North American Archaeologist 27:285–310.Google Scholar
Abbott, David R. 2009 Extensive and Long-Term Specialization: Hohokam Ceramic Production in the Phoenix Basin, Arizona. American Antiquity 74:531–557.Google Scholar
Abbott, David, R., and Foster, Michael S. 2003 Site Structure, Chronology, and Population. In Centuries of Decline during the Hohokam Classic Period at Pueblo Grande, edited by David R. Abbott, pp. 24–48. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Abbott, David R., Ingram, Scott E., and Kober, Brent G. 2006 Hohokam Exchange and Early Classic Period Organization in Central Arizona: Focal Villages or Linear Communities? Journal of Field Archaeology 31:285–305.Google Scholar
Abrams, Elliot M. 1989 Architecture and Energy: An Evolutionary Perspective. In Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 47–87. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Aguirre, Yjino 1994 Echoes of the Conquistadores: History of a Pioneer Family in the Southwest. 2nd ed. Privately Printed. Copy on file in Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Bayman, James M. 1995 Rethinking “Redistribution” in the Archaeological Record: Obsidian Exchange at the Marana Platform Mound. Journal of Anthropological Research 51:37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard-Shaw, Mary 1983 The Stone Tool Assemblage of The Salt-Gila Aqueduct Project Sites. In Hohokam Archaeology along the Salt-Gila Arizona Project Volume VIII: Material Culture, edited by Lynn S. Teague and Patricia L. Crown, pp. 373–443. Archaeological Series No. 150. Cultural Resource Management Division, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E., Feinman, Gary M., Kowlewski, Stephen A., and Peregrine, Peter N. 1996 A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37:1–14.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P. 1995 Centrality and AIDS. Connections 18(1): 112–114.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P. 2005 Centrality and Network Flow. Social Networks 27:55–71.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., and Everett, Martin G. 2006 A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality. Social Networks 28:466–484.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin, G. Everett, and Freeman, Linton C. 1999 UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Analytic Technologies, Natick, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., Mehra, Ajay, Brass, Daniel J., and Labianca, Giuseppe 2009 Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science 323:892–895.Google Scholar
Bradley, Bruce A. 1993 Planning, Growth, and Functional Differentiation at a Prehistoric Pueblo: A Case Study from Southwest Colorado. Journal of Field Archaeology 20:23–42.Google Scholar
Brandes, Ulrik 2008 On Variants of Shortest-Path Betweenness Centrality and Their Generic Computation. Social Networks 30:136–145.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1982 Toward a Structural Theory of Action. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1997 A Note on Social Capital and Network Content. Social Networks 19:355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 2005 Brokerage and Closure. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Conceição, Pedro, and Ferreira, Pedro 2000 The Young Person’s Guide to the Theil Index: Suggesting Intuitive Interpretations and Exploring Analytical Applications. Working Paper No. 14. University of Texas Inequality Project, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Cook, Sherbourne F. 1972 Prehistoric Demography. Modular Publications No. 16. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Craig, Douglas B. 2001 Domestic Architecture and Household Wealth at Grewe. In Grewe Archaeological Research Project, Vol. III Synthesis, edited by Douglas B. Craig, pp. 116–130. Anthropological Papers No. 99–1 Northland Research, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Craig, Douglas B. 2007 Courtyard Groups and House Estates in Early Hohokam Society. In The Durable House: House Society Models in Archaeology, edited by Robin A. Beck, pp. 463–446. Occasional Paper No. 35. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
Crown, Patricia L. 1985 Morphology and Function of Hohokam Small Structures. Kiva 2/3:75–94.Google Scholar
Crown, Patricia L. 1987 Classic Period Hohokam Settlement and Land Use in the Casa Grande Ruins Area, Arizona. Journal of Field Archaeology 14:147–162.Google Scholar
Doelle, William H., Huntington, Frederick W., and Wallace, Henry D. 1987 Rincon Phase Community in the Tucson Basin. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 71–95. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
Doelle, William H., and Wallace, Henry D. 1986 Hohokam Settlement Patterns in the San Xavier Project Area Southern Tucson Basin. Technical Report No. 84–6, Institute for American Research, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Downum, Christian E. 1986 The Occupational Use of Hill Space in the Tucson Basin: Evidence from Linda Vista Hill. Kiva 51:219–232.Google Scholar
Downum, Christian E. 1993 Between Desert and River: Hohokam Settlement and Land Use in the Los Robles Community. Anthropological Papers No. 57. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Downum, Christian E. 1995 Archaeological Investigations at Linda Vista Hill, 1980–1987. In Archaeological Investigations at Los Morteros: A Prehistoric Settlement in the Northern Tucson Basin, Vol. 2, edited by Henry D. Wallace, pp. 1155–1183. Anthropological Papers No. 17. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Downum, Christian E. 2007 Cerros de Trincheras in Southern Arizona: Review and Current Status of the Debate. In Trincheras Sites in Time, Space, and Society, edited by Suzanne K. Fish, Paul R. Fish, and M. Elisa Villalpando. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Doyel, David E. 1991 Hohokam Cultural Evolution in the Phoenix Basin. In Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, edited by George J. Gumerman, pp. 231–279. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Doyel, David E. 2000 The Santan Phase in the Phoenix Basin. In The Hohokam Village Revisited, edited by David E. Doyel, Suzanne K. Fish, and Paul R. Fish, pp. 221–244. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
Drennan, Robert D., Peterson, Christian E., and Fox, Jake R. 2010 Degrees and Kinds of Inequality. In Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequality, edited by T. Douglas Price and Gary M. Feinman, pp. 45–76. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Elson, Mark D. 1996 An Ethnographic Perspective on Prehistoric Platform Mounds of the Tonto Basin, Central Arizona. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthroplogy, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Elson, Mark D., and Abbott, David R. 2000 Organizational Variability in Platform Mound-Building Groups of the American Southwest. In Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Mills, pp. 117–135. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Feinman, Gary M. 1995 The Emergence of Inequlaity: A Focus on Strategies and Processes. In Foundations of Social Inequality, edited by T. Douglas Price and Gary M. Feinman, pp. 255–279. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Feinman, Gary M., Golitko, Mark, Meierhoff, James, and Williams, Ryan P. 2012 Complexities of Collapse: The Evidence of Maya Obsidian as Revealed by Social Network Graphical Analysis. Antiquity 86:507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinman, Gary, and Neitzel, Jill 1984 Too Many Types: An Overview of Prestate Societies in the Americas. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 39–102. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Fish, Paul R., and Fish, Suzanne K. 1994 Southwest and Northwest: Recent Research at the Juncture of the United States and Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Research 2:3–43.Google Scholar
Fish, Paul R., and Fish, Suzanne K. 2000 The Marana Mound Site: Patterns of Social Differentiation in the Early Classic Period. In The Hohokam Village Revisited, pp. 245–275. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
Fish, Suzanne K., and Fish, Paul R. 2000 The Institutional Contexts of Hohokam Complexity. In Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Mills, pp. 154–167. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Fish, Suzanne K., and Fish, Paul R. 2015 The Classic Period in the Tucson Basin. In Hohokam Trajectories in Worldwide Perspective, edited by Paul R. Fish and Suzanne K. Fish. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, in press.Google Scholar
Fish, Suzanne K., Fish, Paul R., and Downum, Christian 1984 Hohokam Terraces and Agricultural Production in the Tucson Basin. In Prehistoric Agricultural Strategies in the Southwest, edited by Suzanne K. Fish and Paul R. Fish. Anthropological Research Papers No. 33. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Fish, Suzanne K., Fish, Paul R., and Madsen, John H. 1992 Evolution and Structure of the Classic Period Marana Community. In The Marana Community in the Hohokam World, edited by Suzanne K. Fish, Paul R. Fish, and John H. Madsen, pp. 20–40. Anthropological Papers No. 56. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. 1979 Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1:215–239.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. 1980 The Gatekeeper, Pair-Dependency, and Structural Centrality. Quality and Quantity 14:585–592.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. 2004 The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton. C, Borgatti, Stephen. P., and White, Douglas R. 1991 Centrality in Valued Graphs: A Measure of Betweenness Based on Network Flow. Social Networks 13:141–154.Google Scholar
Gladwin, Harold S., Haury, Emil W., Sayles, Edwin B., and Gladwin, Nora 1937 Excavations at Snaketown I: Material Culture. Medallion Papers No. 25. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Gregory, David A. 1987 The Morphology of Platform Mounds and the Structure of Classic Period Hohokam Sites. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 183–210. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Gregory, David A. 1991 Form and Variation in Hohokam Settlement Patterns. In Chaco & Hohokam: Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Patricia L. Crown and W. James Judge, pp. 159–193. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Gregory, David A., and Nials, Fred L. 1985 Observations Concerning the Distribution of Classic Period Hohokam Platform Mounds. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, edited by Alfred E. Dittert, Jr., and Donald E. Dove, pp. 373–388. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Harry, Karen G., and Bayman, James A. 2000 Leadership Strategies among the Classic Period Hohokam: A Case Study. In Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Mills, pp. 136–153. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Haury, Emil W. 1976 The Hohokam: Desert Farmers and Craftsmen—Excavations at Snaketown, 1964–1965. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian, and Cannon, Aubrey 1982 The Corporate Group as an Archaeological Unit. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:132–158.Google Scholar
Henderson, Kathleen T. 1987 The Growth of a Hohokam Village. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 97–125. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
Henderson, Kathleen T. 2001 House Clusters, Courtyard Groups, and Site Structure. In The Grewe Archaeological Research Project, edited by Douglas B. Craig, pp. 51–92. Anthropological Papers No. 99–1. Northland Research, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Henderson, Kathleen T., and Clark, Tiffany C. 2004 Changing Perspectives: Considerations of Past Agricultural Use of the Salt River Floodplain. In Hohokam Farming on the Salt River Floodplain: Refining Models and Analytical Methods, edited by Kathleen T. Henderson, pp. 167–186. Anthropological Papers No. 43. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hill, Brett J., Clark, Jeffery J., Doelle, William H., and Lyons, Patrick D. 2004 Prehistoric Demography in the Southwest: Migration, Coalescence, and Hohokam Population Decline. American Antiquity: 689–716.Google Scholar
Hillier, Bill, and Hanson, Julienne 1984 The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Howard, Ann V. 1983 The Organization of Interregional Shell Production and Exchange with Southwestern Arizona. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Howard, Jerry B. 1987 The Lehi Canal System: Organization of a Classic Period Irrigation Community. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 211–221. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
Howard, Jerry B. 2000 Quantitative Approaches to Spatial Patterning in the Hohokam Village: Testing the Village Segment Model. In The Hohokam Village Revisited, edited by David E. Doyel, Suzanne K. Fish, and Paul R. Fish, pp. 167–196. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
Hunt, Robert C. 1988 Size and the Structure of Authority in Canal Irrigation Systems. Journal of Anthropological Research 44:335–355.Google Scholar
Hunt, Robert C., Guillet, David, Abbott, David R., Bayman, James, Fish, Paul, Fish, Suzanne, Kintigh, Keith, and Neely, James A. 2005 Plausible Ethnographic Analogies for the Social Organization of Hohokam Canal Irrigation. American Antiquity 70:433–456.Google Scholar
Huntington, Frederick W. 1986 Household and Community Orgazination. In Archaeological Investigations at the West Branch Site Early and Middle Rincon Occupation in the Southern Tucson Basin, edited by Frederick W. Huntington, pp. 79–126. Anthropological Papers No. 5. Insitute for American Research, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Kadushin, Charles 2004 Too Much Investment in Social Capital. Social Networks 26:75–90.Google Scholar
Katzer, Keith 1993 A Geomorphic Evaluation of the Agricultural Potential of Cerros de Trincheras. In Between Desert and River: Hohokam Settlement and Land Use in the Los Robles Community, edited by Chrisitan E. Downum, pp. 91–95. Anthropological Papers No. 57. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Knappett, Carl 2011 An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Knoke, David, and Burt, Ronald S. 1983 Prominence. In Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, edited by Robert S. Burt, Michael J. Minor, and Richard D. Alba, pp. 195–222. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
Lorenz, MaxO. 1905 Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association 9:202–219.Google Scholar
Mabry, Jonathan B. 2000 The Red Mountain Phase and the Origins of Hohokam Villages. In The Hohokam Village Revisted, edited by David E. Doyel, Suzanne K. Fish, and Paul R. Fish, pp. 37–64. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
McGuire, Randall H. 1983 Breaking Down Cultural Complexity: Inequality and Heterogeneity. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 91–142. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
McGuire, Randall H., and Elisa Villalpando, M. 2007 Excavations at Cerro de Trincheras. In Trincheras Sites in Time, Space, and Society, edited by Suzanne K. Fish, Paul R. Fish, and M. Elisa Villalpando. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara. J., Clark, Jeffery J., Peeples, Matthew A., Haas, William R., Roberts, John M., Brett Hill, J., Huntley, Deborah L., Borck, Lewis, Breiger, Ronald L., Clauset, Aaron, and Steven Shackley, M. 2013 Transformation of Social Networks in the Late Pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:5785–5790.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Douglas R., and Brunson-Hadley, Judy L. 2001 An Evaluation of Classic Period Hohokam Burials and Society: Chiefs, Priests, or Acephalous Complexity? In Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspectives, edited by Douglas R. Mitchell and Judy L. Brunson-Hadley, pp. 45–67. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Neitzel, Jill E. 1992 Hohokam Material Culture and Behavior: The Dimensions of Organizational Change. In Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, edited by George J. Gumerman, pp. 177–229. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Netting, Robert M. 1982 Some Home Truths on Household Size and Wealth. American Behavioral Scientist 25:641–661.Google Scholar
Netting, Robert M. 1993 Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Linda 1981 Irrigation and Sociopolitical Development in the Salt River Valley, Arizona: An Examination of Three Prehistoric Canal Systems. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Nyerges, Endre A. 1992 The Ecology of Wealfh-in-People: Agriculture, Settlement, and Society on the Perpetual Frontier. American Anthropologist 94:860–881.Google Scholar
Pailes, Matthew C. 2011 Social Organization and Differentiation at a Hohokam Cerros de Trincheras. Journal of Arizona Archaeology 1:197–209.Google Scholar
Rautman, Alison E. 1998 Hierarchy and Heterarchy in the American Southwest: A Comment on McGuire and Saitta. American Antiquity 63:325–333.Google Scholar
Rice, Glen E. 1987 The Marana Community Complex: ATwelfth Century Hohokam Chiefdom. In Studies in the Hohokam Community of Marana, edited by Glen E. Rice, pp. 249–254. Anthropological Field Studies 15. Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Jason S. 2005 Space Syntax Analysis of Arroyo Hondo Pueblo, New Mexico: Community Formation in the Northern Rio Grande. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Sires, Earl W. 1987 Hohokam Architectural Variability and Site Structure during the Sedentary-Classic Transition. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by David E. Doyel, pp. 171–182. The Southewestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwook Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
Theil, Henri 1967 Economics and Information Theory. Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
Valente, Thomas W., and Foreman, Robert K. 1998 Integration and Radiality: Measuring the Extent of an Individual’s Connectedness and Reachability in a Network. Social Networks 20:89–109.Google Scholar
Wallace, Henry D., and Doelle, William H. 2001 Classic Period Warfare in Southern Arizona. In Deadly Landscapes: Case Studies in Prehistoric Southwestern Warfare, edited by Glen E. Rice and Stephen A. LeBlanc, pp. 239–287. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wallace, Henry D., and Lindeman, Michael W. 2003 Valencia Vieja and the Origins of Hohokam Culture. In Roots of Sedentism: Archaeological Excavations at Valencia Vieja: A Founding Village in the Tucson Basin of Southern Arizona, edited by Henry D. Wallace, pp. 371–405. Anthropological Papers No. 29. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R. 1991 Hohokam Social Complexity. In Chaco & Hohokam: Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Patricia L. Crown and W. James Judge, pp. 253–275. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R. 1999 A Preliminary Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Access Relationships at Casas Grandes. In The Casas Grandes World, edited by Curtis F. Schaafsma and Carroll L. Riley, pp. 93–104. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R., and Haas, Jonathan 1994 The Scream of the Butterfly: Competition and Conflict in the Prehistoric Southwest. In Themes in Southwest Prehistory, edited by George J. Gumerman, pp. 211–238. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R., McGuire, Thomas R., and Sternberg, Charles 1981 Snaketown Revisited: A Partial Cultural Resource Survey, Analysis of Site Structure and an Ethnohistoric Study of the Proposed Hohokam-Pima National Monument. Archaeological Series No. 155. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R., and Sternberg, Charles 1983 Hohokam Ballcourts and Their Interpretation. Archaeological Series 160. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R., Wiegand, Phil C., Scott Wood, J., and Howard, Jerry B. 2008 Ancient Cultural Interplay of the American Southwest in the Mexican Northwest. Journal of the Southwest 50:105–210.Google Scholar
Wilk, Richard R., and Netting, Robert M. 1984 Households: Changing Forms and Functions. In Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group, edited by Richard R. Wilk, Robert M. Netting and Eric J. Arnould, pp. 1–28. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar