Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:38:23.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex, Age, and Tooth Position as Factors in the Production of Tooth Wear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen Molnar*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington University

Abstract

In recent studies of heavily worn teeth of California Indian skeletal remains, considerable difference was seen in types and degree of wear. This variation in dental attrition was related to factors of sex, age, tooth position, and, in some cases, dental caries. The relative importance of each of these variables was considered.

The sex of the individual was found to be a major factor in tooth wear and a higher degree of attrition was found among females. As would be expected, the older individuals had the most heavily worn teeth but this relationship was not constant and some differences were seen. Tooth position was also an important variable in determining the degree of wear. The upper teeth were worn more heavily than the lower and alveolar abcesses or carious teeth probably were the causes of regional differences in wear.

The identification of these factors and description of their effect on dental attrition patterns is another step towards understanding human tooth wear. Plotting the frequency of the occurrence of degree and type of wear for each tooth by age group and sex aided in the analysis of this skeletal population. Application of this method of analysis to other groups can provide the means for interpreting the relationships between dental attrition and cultural variables.

This is an expanded version of a paper read at the 1969 annual meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrows, David Prescott 1967 The ethno-botany of the Coahuilla Indians of southern California. Malki Museum Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1939a Food, food values and food habits of the Australian Aborigines in relation to their dental conditions. Australian Journal of Dentistry 43:115.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1939b Food, food values and food habits of the Australian Aborigines in relation to their dental conditions, Part IV. Australian Journal of Dentistry 43:141199.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Albert A. 1963 Dental evolution and culture. Human Biology 35:237249.Google Scholar
Goose, D. H. 1963 Dental measurement; and assessment of its value in anthropological studies. In Dental Anthropology, edited by D. R. Brothwell. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., and Fenega, F. 1939 Archaeological horizons in central California. American Anthropologist 41:378399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, Stephen 1968 Some functional interpretations of tooth wear in prehistoric and modem man. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. R. 1964 A biometric study of the heliocoidal occlusal plane of the worn Australian dentition. Archives Oral Biology 9:255267.Google Scholar
Sicher, Harry 1953 The biology of attrition. Oral Surgery 6:406412.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1953 The major features of evolution. Clarion Books, Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Howard K. 1939 Gnathodynamics. The measurement of biting forces with a new design of gnathodynamometer. Australian Journal of Dentistry 43:381393.Google Scholar