No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Response to Miksicek, Elsesser, Wuebber, Bruhns, and Hammond
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
A recent statement by the five authors purports to demonstrate that the fruit we previously identified as ramón was really achiote. This response points out several weaknesses in the five authors' ethnohistorical methodology that makes their identification far less secure. The original aim of our paper is restated to turn discussion away from the minor point of ramón versus achiote.
- Type
- Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983