Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:49:50.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to MacNeish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Walter W. Taylor
Walter W. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Ill.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a rejoinder to Taylor's review of his Tamaulipas monograph, MacNeish restated his method of analysis and reviewed the system he used to establish his phase sequence. Taylor claims that MacNeish has defended his position by introducing new data and by presenting a point of view not expressed in the original monograph. Taylor insists that MacNeish's reply only confirms his original criticism that the Tamaulipas sequence is built on the premise that one excavation unit equals one phase.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 1960 , pp. 263 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

MacNeish, R. S. 1947. A Preliminary Report on Coastal Tamaulipas, Mexico. American Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–15. Menasha.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1958. Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 48, Pt. 6. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
MacNeish, R. S. 1960. Rejoinder to Taylor. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 591–3. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1960. Review of “Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico.” by MacNeish, R. S.. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 434–6. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar