Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:30:44.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconstruction of Prehistoric Environments through the Analysis of Molluscan Collections from Shell Middens*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Max R. Matteson*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.

Abstract

In Illinois, the shells of fresh-water mussels are often found in large numbers in the middens of former Indian habitations which were located adjacent to rivers. Living representatives of the species present are usually common in the rivers of the state today. With knowledge gained through study of the habitat-demands of the different species as they now live, one is able to reconstruct the environment in which each species existed at the time when the mussels were taken for food. The picture formed by the combined habitat-demands of the different species is a portrayal of the river as it existed at that time. An analysis of the shells taken from a midden on Haw Creek, now often intermittent during summer months, suggests that it was a small river 2000 years ago. Other analyses of shells have shown that decided changes have taken place in other streams.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented before Section H, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, December, 1959.

References

Matteson, M. R. 1953. Fresh-water Mussels Used by Illinoisan Indians of the Hopewell Culture. Nautilus, Vol. 66, pp. 130–8; Vol. 67, pp. 25–6. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Matteson, M. R. 1959. An Analysis of the Shells of Fresh-water Mussels Gathered by Indians in Southwestern Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois Academy of Science, Vol. 52, pp. 52–8. Springfield.Google Scholar