Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:30:39.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raw-Material Availability and the Organization of Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William Andrefsky Jr.
William Andrefsky Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4910
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnographic examples of stone-tool makers in Australia and archaeological examples from three different areas in the western United States indicate that the availability of lithic raw materials is an important variable conditioning stone-tool production technology. Attributes of availability such as abundance and quality of lithic raw materials condition the production of formal- vs. informal-tool types. Poor-quality raw materials tend to be manufactured into informal-tool designs. High-quality lithic raw materials tend to be manufactured into formal-tool designs when such materials occur in low abundance. When high-quality materials occur in great abundance both formal- and informal-tool designs are manufactured. Other factors, such as residential mobility or sedentism, are found to be less-important determinates of lithic-production technology.

Resumen

Resumen

Ejemplos etnográficos de los productores de herramientas de piedra en Australia y ejemplos arqueológicos de tres diferentes áreas en el oeste de los Estados Unidos indican que la disponibilidad de materia prima lítica es uno de los condicionantes más importantes en la tecnología de producción de herramientas de piedra. Se ha encontrado que ciertas características, tales como la abundancia y calidad de la materia prima lítica, sonfactores importantes en la producción de herramientas formales vs. herramientas informales. Materia prima de baja calidad tiende a ser utilizada en diseños de herramientas informales, mientras que materia prima de aha calidad tiende a ser utilizada en disenos de herramientas formales cuando ésta no es abundante. Cuando materiales de alta calidad son muy abundantes, los diseños de herramientas formales e informales tienden a ser producidos. Otros factores, como mobilidad residential y sedentismo, son determinantes menos importantes en la tecnología de producción lítica.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 21 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, S. 1971 Projectile Point Form and Function at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Research Series No. 8. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1983 Lithic Raw-Material Use and Prehistoric Interaction Networks. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1986 Numerical Types and Inspectional Types : Evaluating Shape Characterization Procedures. North American Archaeologist 7 : 95–112.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1987 Diffusion and Innovation from the Perspective of Wedge Shaped Cores in Alaska and Japan. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 13–44. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1991 Inferring Trends in Prehistoric Settlement Behavior from Lithic Production Technology in the Southern Plains. North American Archaeologist 12 : 129–144.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr. (editor) 1990 An Introduction to the Archaeology of Pinon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado. Larson-Tibesar and Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to National Park Service, Denver, Contract No. CX 1200-7-B054. Copies available from Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Andrefsky, W. Jr., and Zier, C. J. 1990 Prehistoric Research Design. In An Introduction to the Archaeology of Pinon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado, edited by Andrefsky, W. Jr., pp. 8.1-8.34. Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to National Park Service, Denver, Contract No. CX 1200-7-B054. Copies available from Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. B. 1986 Technological Efficiency and Tool Curation. American Antiquity 51 : 38–50.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. B. 1990 Settlement, Raw Material, and Lithic Procurement in the Central Mojave Desert. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9 : 70–104.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. B. 1991 Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use : A California Example. American Antiquity 56 : 216–234.Google Scholar
Bienenfeld, P., and Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1984 Projectile Point Life Cycles and Use-Resharpening Analysis. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes : Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35 : 255–273.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1982 The Archaeology of Place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 : 5–31.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1986 An Alyawara Day : Making Mens's Knives and Beyond. American Antiquity 51 : 547–562.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., and Connell, J. F. O. 1984 An Alyawara Day : The Stone Quarry. Journal of Anthropological Research 40 : 406–432.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. 1969 Prehistoric Panhandle Culture on the Chaquaqua Plateau, Southeastern Colorado. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Clark, J. 1987 Politics, Prismatic Blades, and Mesoamerican Civilization. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 259–284. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Dohm, K., and Sanders, P. H. 1991 The Archaeology of Residential Sites I : 45P0137, A Mat Lodge Village. In The Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Draft Final Report, edited by Sanders, P. H., Andrefsky, W. Jr., and Samuels, S. R., pp. 14.1-14.101. Project Report No. 16. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Draper, J. A. 1991 Lithic Artifact Analysis. In The Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Draft Final Report, edited by Sanders, P. H., Andrefsky, W. Jr., and Samuels, S. R., pp. 21.1-21.81. Project Report No. 16. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Finnigan, J. T. 1983 Tipi to Tipi Ring : A Transformational Model. In From Microcosm to Macrocosm : Advances in Tipi Ring Investigation and Interpretation, edited by Davis, L. B., pp. 17–28. Memoir No. 19. Plains Anthropologist, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1978 Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1979 Observations on the Use of Stone Tools : Dulling of Working Edges on Some Chipped Stone Tools in Bison Butchering. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, edited by Hayden, B., pp. 259–268. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goodyear, A. C. 1979 A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Material Among Paleo-Indian Groups of North America. Research Manuscript Series No. 156. Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A. 1978 The Anthropology of Human Residues. American Anthropologist 80 : 815–835.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A. 1980 Living Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gould, R. A., and Saggers, S. 1985 Lithic Procurement in Central Australia : A Closer Look at Binford's Idea of Embeddedness in Archaeology. American Antiquity 50 : 117–136.Google Scholar
Gramly, R. M. 1983 Raw Material Source Areas and ‘Curated’ Tool Assemblages. American Antiquity 45 : 823–833.Google Scholar
Henry, D. O. 1989 Correlations Between Reduction Strategies and Settlement Patterns. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, edited by Henry, D. O. and Odell, G. H., pp. 139–212. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Hilman, R. G., Sanders, P. H., Tibesar, W. L., and Dueholm, K. H. 1986 A Study of Site Formation Processes : The Rochelle Non-Contiguous Archaeological District. Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to The Rochelle Coal Company. Copies available from Larson-Tibesar Associates, 421 South Cedar, Laramie, Wyoming.Google Scholar
Kalasz, S. M. 1990 Prehistoric Feature Analysis. In An Introduction to the Archaeology of Pinon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado, edited by Andrefsky, W. Jr., pp. 12.1-12.90. Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to National Park Service, Denver, Contract No. CX 1200-7-B054. Copies available from Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. H. 1982 Hafting and Retooling : Effects on the Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 47 : 798–809.Google Scholar
Kehoe, T. F. 1960 Stone Tipi Rings in North Central Montana and the Adjacent Portion of Alberta, Canada : Their Historical, Ethnological and Archaeological Aspects. Bulletin No. 173. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Kelly, R. 1988 The Three Sides of a Biface. American Antiquity 53 : 717–734.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. L. 1991 ‘Unpacking’ Reduction : Lithic Raw Material Economy in the Mousterian of West-Central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10 : 76–106.Google Scholar
Lewenstein, S. M. 1987 Stone Tool Use at Cerros : The Ethnoarchaeological and Use-Wear Evidence. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
McFaul, M., and Reider, R. 1989 The Physical Environment of PCMS. In An Introduction to the Archaeology of Pinon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado, edited by Andrefsky, W. Jr., pp. 2.1-2.12. Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to National Park Service, Denver, Contract No. CX 1200-7-B054. Copies available from Rocky Mountain Regional Office, National Park Service, Denver.Google Scholar
Morrow, C. A., and Jefferies, R. W. 1989 Trade or Embedded Procurement? : A Test Case from Southern Illinois. In Time, Energy and Stone Tools, edited by Torrence, R., pp. 27–33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mulloy, W. T. 1966 Late Prehistoric Stone Circles. The Wyoming Archaeologist 9 : 2–3.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. F. 1977 Aspects of Variation in Central Australian Lithic Assemblages. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers : Change, Evolution and Complexity, edited by Wright, R. V. S., pp. 269–281. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1981 The Morphological Express at Function Junction : Searching for Meaning in Lithic Tool Types. Journal of Anthropological Research 37 : 319–342.Google Scholar
Parry, W. J., and Kelly, R. L. 1987 Expedient Core Technology and Sedentism. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C. A., pp. 285–304. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rolland, N., and Dibble, H. L. 1990 A New Synthesis of Middle Paleolithic Variability. American Antiquity 55 : 480–499.Google Scholar
Sanders, P. H., Andrefsky, W. Jr., and Samuels, S. R. (editors) 1991 The Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Draft Final Report, Project Report No. 16. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Shackley, M. S. 1990 Early Hunter-Gatherer Procurement Ranges and Mobility in the American Southwest : Evidence from Obsidian Geochemistry and Lithic Technology. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Siegel, P. E. 1984 Functional Variability Within an Assemblage of Endscrapers. Lithic Technology 13 : 35–51.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. 1991 Kalispel Ethnography and Ethnohistory. In The Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Draft Final Report, edited by Sanders, P. H., Andrefsky, W. Jr., and Samuels, S. R., pp. 8.1-8.156. Project Report No. 16. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Sollberger, J. T. 1971 A Technological Study of Beveled Knives. Plains Anthropologist 16 : 209–218.Google Scholar
Thorns, A. V., and Burtchard, G. C. 1986 New Research Data and Strategies for Continuing the Investigation of Land Use Systems in the Calispell Valley. In Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Interim Report, edited by Thorns, A. V. and Burtchard, G. C., pp. 597–627. Contributions in Cultural Resource Management No. 10. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Thorns, A. V., and Burtchard, G. C. (editors) 1986 Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Interim Report. Contributions in Cultural Resource Management No. 10. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Tibesar, W. L., Todd, L. C., Larson, T. K., Gilbert, B. M., and Dueholm, K. H. 1981 An Intensive Cultural Resource Investigation Conducted on the Proposed Rochelle Coal Mine in Southern Campbell County, Wyoming. Larson-Tibesar Associates, Laramie, Wyoming. Submitted to the Rochelle Coal Company. Copies available from Wyoming Recreation Commission, Division of Review and Compliance, Laramie, Wyoming.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1983 Time Budgeting and Hunter-Gatherer Technology. In Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, edited by Bailey, G., pp. 11–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1989 Time, Energy and Stone Tools. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Towner, R. H., and Draper, J. A. 1986 Lithic Analysis for the Calispell Valley Archaeological Project. In Calispell Valley Archaeological Project : Interim Report, edited by Thorns, A. V. and Burtchard, G. C., pp. 553–596. Contributions in Cultural Resource Management No. 10. Center for Northwest Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
White, J. P. 1967 Ethno-archaeology in New Guinea : Two Examples. Mankind 6 : 409–414.Google Scholar
White, J. P., and Thomas, D. H. 1972 What Mean These Stones? Ethno-taxonomic Models and Archaeological Interpretations in the New Guinea Highlands. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, D. L., pp. 275–308. Methuen, London.Google Scholar