Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:21:32.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon “Effective” Half-Life for Maya Calendar Correlations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Elizabeth K. Ralph*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Abstract

The question is frequently asked: How would a change in the half-life of C14 affect the Maya calendar correlations? The optimum “effective” half-life value for this era, as determined by the Pennsylvania measurements of contemporaneous samples of known age, and, as pointed out by Satterthwaite and Ralph (1960), is, by coincidence, very close to the Libby half-life (5568±30 years). Nevertheless, a change in the value of the half-life of C14 would not necessarily change the “effective” half-life, and, on the basis of present data, no change should be made in the University of Pennsylvania dating of the Maya calendar correlation samples.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kohler, E. L., and E. K., Ralph In press C14 Dates for Sites in the Meditenanean Area. American Journal of Archaeology. Princeton.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1961 Radiocarbon Dating. Science, Vol. 133, No. 3453, pp. 621—9. Washington.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K. and Stuckenrath, R. Jr. 1960 Carbon-14 Measurements of Known Age Samples. Nature, Vol. 188, No. 4746, pp. 185–7. London.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, Linton and Ralph, E. K. 1960 New Radiocarbon Dates and the Maya Correlation Problem. American Antiquity, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 165–84. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar