Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:42:06.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prestige and Prejudice: The Role of Long Distance Big Game Hunting as an Optimal Foraging Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Deanna N. Grimstead
Deanna N. Grimstead*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85711 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Signaling theory has much to offer anthropology and archaeology, which is in part why there is an increasing number of applications and healthy debates surrounding how best to apply it. One of those debates surrounds whether big game hunting is a costly signal or simply an aspect of efficient foraging. Grimstead (2010) contributed to this debate by showing that long-distance big-game hunting (greater than 100 km roundtrip) produces higher caloric return rates than does local small-game hunting, despite increased costs of travel and transport for the former. Whittaker and Carpenter (this issue) present a model that also suggests long-distance big-game hunting produces higher economic returns than local foraging but only up to about 50 km. This paper provides further details on the tenets of the Grimstead (2010) paper in response to criticisms by Whittaker and Carpenter (this issue), and then uses a previously published central place foraging model (Cannon 2003) to show that another model also shows long-distance big-game hunting over a distance greater than 100 kilometers roundtrip produces higher returns than local foraging.

La teoría de Señalización tiene mucho que ofrecerle a las disciplinas de antropología y arqueología, y es en parte la razón qué hay varias aplicaciones y debates sanos en como mejor aplicarla. Uno de los debates rodea si la caza mayor es una señal costosa, o si simplemente es un aspecto de la eficiencia de forrajeo. Grimstead (2010) contribuyó a este debate, mostrando que la caza mayor de larga distancia (más de 100 km, ida y vuelta) produce mayores tasas de rendimientos calóricos que los de caza menor locales, a pesar de aumento de costos de viaje y transporte para el primero. Whittaker y Carpenter (this issue) presentan un modelo que también sugiere que la caza mayor a larga distancia produce mayores rendimientos económicos que los de alimentaciones locales, pero sólo hasta unos 50 km. Este documento proporciona más detalles sobre los principios del documento Grimstead (2010) en respuesta a las críticas por Whittaker y Carpenter (this issue), y luego utiliza un modelo previamente publicado de lugar central de forrajeo (Cannon 2003) para demostrar que también otro modelo muestra que la caza mayor de larga distancia más de 100 kilómetros de viaje redondo produce mayores beneficios que los locales de alimentación.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 168 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bayham, Frank E., 1979 Factors Influencing the Archaic Pattern of Animal Exploitation. The Kiva 44:219–235.Google Scholar
Bliege-Bird, Rebecca, and Smith, Eric A. 2005 Signaling Theory, Strategic Interaction, and Symbolic Capital. Current Anthropology 46(2):221–248.Google Scholar
Bliege-Bird, Rebecca, Smith, Eric A., and Bird, Douglas W.. 2001 The Hunting Handicap: Costly Signaling in Male Foraging Strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociology 50:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, M., Pastene, J., Germain, M., and Lacour, J. R. 1993 Influence of Training, Sex, Age, and Body Mass on the Energy Cost of Running. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 66:439–444.Google Scholar
Bramble, Dennis M., and Lieberman, Daniel E. 2004 Endurance Running and the Evolution of Homo. Nature 432:345–354.Google Scholar
Broughton, Jack M., and Bayham, Frank E. 2003 Showing Off, Foraging Models, and the Ascendance of Large-Game Hunting in the California Middle Archaic. American Antiquity 68:783–789.Google Scholar
Broughton, Jack M., Cannon, Michael D., Bayham, Frank E., and Byers, David A. 2011 Prey Body Size and Ranking in Zooarchaeology: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Applications from the Northern Great Basin. American Antiquity, in press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Michael D., 2003 A Model of Central Place Forager Prey Choice and an Application to Faunal Remains from the Mimbres Valley, New Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22:1–25.Google Scholar
Codding, Brian F., and Jones, Terry L. 2007 Man the Showoff? Or the Ascendance of a Just-so-story: A Comment on Recent Applications of Costly Signaling Theory in American Archaeology. American Antiquity 72:349–347.Google Scholar
Farmer, Florence A., and Neilson, Helen R. 1967 The Caloric Value of Meats and Fish of Northern Canada. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association 28:174–178.Google Scholar
Grimstead, Deanna N., 2010 Ethnographic and Modeled Costs of Long-Distance, Big-Game hunting. American Antiquity 75:61–81.Google Scholar
Grimstead, Deanna N., and Bayham, Frank E. 2010 Evolutionary Ecology, Elite Feasting, and the Hohokam: A Case Study from a Southern Arizona Platform Mound. American Antiquity 75:841–864.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, William R., McGuire, Kelly R., and Rosenthal, Jeffrey S. 2010 Human Behavioral Ecology and Historical Contingency: A Comment on the Diablo Canyon Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 75:679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, William R., and McGuire, Kelly R. 2003 Large-Game Hunting, Gender-Differentiated Work Organization, and the Role of Evolutionary Ecology in California and Great Basin Prehistory: A Reply to Broughton and Bayham. American Antiquity 68:790–792.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim, Hawkes, Kristen, Hill, H., and Magdalena Hurtado, A. 1987 Foraging Decisions among the Ache Hunter-Gatherers: New Data and Implications for Optimal Foraging Models. Ethnology and Sociobiology 8:1–36.Google Scholar
Hockett, Bryan, 2005 Middle and Late Holocene Hunting in the Great Basin: A Critical Review of the Debate and Future Prospects. American Antiquity 70:231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Terry L., and Codding, Brian F. 2010 Historical Contingencies, Issues of Scale, and Flightless Hypotheses: A Response to Hildebrandt et al. American Antiquity 75:689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Terry L, Porcasi, Judith F., Gaeta, Jerme W., and Codding, Brian F. 2008 The Diablo Canyon Fauna: A Course-Grained Record of Trans-Holocene Foraging from the Central California Mainland Coast. American Antiquity 73:289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, John R., 1978 Optimal Foraging: Decision Rules for Predators. In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, pp. 22–63. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Daniel E., Dennis M., Bramble, and Raichlen, David 2009 Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. In The First Humans: Origin and Early Evolution of the Genus Homo: Contributions From the Third Stony Brook Human Evolution Symposium and Workshop, October 3 – October 7,2006, edited by Frederick E. Gine, John G. Fleagle, and Richard E. Leakey, pp. 77–98. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kelly R., Hildebrandt, William R., and Carpenter, Kimberly L. 2007 Costly Signaling and the Ascendance of No-Can-Do Archaeology: A Reply to Codding and Jones. American Antiquity 72:358–365.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kelly R., and Hildebrandt, William R. 2005 Re-thinking Great Basin Foragers: Prestige Hunting and Costly Signaling during the Middle Archaic Period. American Antiquity 70:695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrigal, T. Cregg, and Zimmerman Holt, Julie 2002 White-Tailed Deer Meat and Marrow Return Rates and Their Application to Eastern Woodlands Archaeology. American Antiquity 67:745–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, George V., Scott, Edward M., Hursh, Laurence M., Heller, Christine A., Youmans, John B., Consolazio, C. Frank, Bridgforth, Edwin B., Russel, Albert L., and Silverman, M. 1962 The Health and Nutritional Status of Alaskan Eskimos: A Survey of the Interdepartmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense–1958. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 11:31–76.Google Scholar
Margaria, R., Cerretelli, P., Aghemo, P., and Sassi, G. 1963 Energy Cost of Running. Journal of Applied Physiology 18:367–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merril, Annabel L., and Watt, Bernice K. 1974 Energy Value of Foods: Basis and Derivation. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 74. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Duncan, and Renee Barlow, K. 1992 A Model for Exploring the Optimal Trade-off between Field Processing and Transport. American Anthropologist 94:340–356.Google Scholar
Murphy, Elizabeth W., Criner, Patricia E., and Gray, Brucy C. 1975 Comparisons of methods for Calculating Retentions of Nutrients in cooked Foods. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 23(6):1153–1157.Google Scholar
Schoener, Thomas W., 1971 Theory of Feeding Strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, Steven Rodney, 1987 Behavioral Ecology and Hunter-Gatherer Foraging: An Example from the Great Basin. BAR International Series 381. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric A., 1980 Evolutionary Ecology and the Analysis of Human Foraging Behavior: An Inuit Example from the East Coast of Hudson Bay. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Cornell University. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric A., 1991 Inujjuamiut Foraging Strategies: Evolutionary Ecology of an Arctic Hunting Community. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.R., 1994 Relating Mechanics and Energetics during Exercise. In Comparative Vertebrate Exercise Physiology: Unifying Physiological Principles, edited by lames H. Jones, pp. 181–215. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R., Schmidt-Nielsen, K., and Raab, J. L. 1970 Scaling of Energetic Cost of Running to Body Size in Mammals. American Journal of Physiology 219:1104–1107.Google Scholar
Tryjanowski, Piotr, and Hromada, Martin 2005 Do Males of the Great Grey Shrike, Lanius excubitor, Trade Food for Extrapair Copulations? Animal Behaviour 69:529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugan, Andrew, 2005 Does Size Matter? Body Size, Mass Collecting, and Their Implications for Understanding Prehistoric Foraging Behavior. American Antiquity 70:75–90.Google Scholar
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) 2010a Composition of Foods: Raw, Processed, and Prepared. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 23. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) 2010b USDA National Nutrient Dataset for Standard Reference Release 23. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A. 1997 The Handicap Principle. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar