Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:47:39.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pictographs of the San Luis Rey Basin, California*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. L. True
D. L. True*
Affiliation:
Pauma Valley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The San Luis Rey River flows westward across northern San Diego County, California. The area from Henshaw dam down to and including the Bonsall post office can be described as the central San Luis Rey River basin. It includes a little less than half of the total watershed area but contains many tributary streams and probably accounts for more than half of the total runoff. The area is mountainous and wooded or brush covered and is dissected by numerous small streams, many of which originate in the higher elevations of the Agua Tibia and Palomar mountain ranges.

Ample water supplies and favorable thermal zones which belt the area, coupled with a heavy growth of forest cover along the streams, provided both vegetal and animal food supplies which in turn resulted in more than average aboriginal population. The heaviest concentrations of population were in the areas now known as Pauma Valley, Rincon, The Potrero, and the La Jolla area, all of which still have sizable Indian populations living on reservations. In historic times, the region was occupied by Indians of the Luisefio stock (Kroeber, 1925, p. 648).

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , July 1954 , pp. 68 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author wishes to exptess his appreciation to C. W. Meighan, University of California at Los Angeles, who read an earlier version of the manuscript and offered many helpful suggestions.

References

Du BOIS, CONSTANCE GODDARD 1908. The Religion of the Luiseño Indians of Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 8, No. 3. Berkeley.Google Scholar
FENENGA, FRANKLIN 1949. Methods of Recording and Present Status of Knowledge Concerning Petroglyphs in California. Reports of the California Archaeological Survey, No. 3. Berkeley.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, JOHN P. 1933. Annotations in Chingichnich. A Revised and Annotated Version of A. Robinson’s Translation of Father Geronimo Boscana’s Historical Account of the Indians of the Mission San Juan Capistrano. Fine Arts Press. Santa Ana, California.Google Scholar
KROEBER, A. L. V. 1908. Notes on the Luiseños. (See Du Bois above), 1908, pp. 174–86.Google Scholar
KROEBER, A. L. V. 1925. Handbook of rhe Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78. Washington.Google Scholar
MALLERY, GARRICK 1889. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington.Google Scholar
SPARKMAN, PHILLIP STEDMAN 1908. The Culture of the Luiseño Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 8, No. 4. Berkeley.Google Scholar
STEWARD, JULIAN H. 1929. Petroglyphs of California and Adjoining States. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 24, No. 2. Berkeley.Google Scholar
STRONG, WILLIAM DUNCAN 1929. Aboriginal Society in Soutnern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology. Vol. 26. Berkeley.Google Scholar