Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:32:18.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mortal Pots: On Use Life and Vessel Size in the Formation of Ceramic Assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael J. Shott
Michael J. Shott*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614–0513
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We know a great deal about how prehistoric pots were made and used but surprisingly little about how long they lasted in service. Vessel use life, however, is an important component of ceramic assemblage formation. A growing body of ethnoarchaeological data shows that the directly measurable “primitive property” of vessel size—in its various dimensions—is positively related to use life and that height and weight are the most reliable predictors of use life. Results offer the provisional prospect of estimating use life of archaeological vessels from their size.

Sabemos muchísimo acerca del uso y la manufactura de vasijas prehistóricas pero muy poco acerca de su duratión. Sin embargo, la duratión del uso de las vasijas contribuyó en forma significativa a la formatión de los conjuntos cerámicos prehistóricos. Una cantidad creciente de datos etnoarqueológicos muestra que la "propiedadprimitiva" de tamaño de la vasija en sus dimensiones variadas está vinculada con la duratión del uso y que la altura y el peso son los indicadores más certeros en ese sentido. Estos resultados ofrecen provisionalmente la posibilidad de estimar duratión de uso de vasijas arqueológicas a partir de su tamaño.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 463 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aldenderfer, M. 1977 The Computer Simulation of Assemblage Formation Processes : The Evaluation of Multivariate Statistical Methods in Archaeological Research. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Ammerman, A. J., and Feldman, M. 1974 On the “Making” of an Assemblage of Stone Tools. American Antiquity 39 : 610–616.Google Scholar
Annis, M. B. 1984 Ethnoarchaeological Research—Water Vessels in Sardinia. Newsletter of the Department of Pottery Technology University of Leiden, Holland 3 : 43–93.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. E. 1985 Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. 1988 Household Ceramic Assemblage Attributes in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Research 44 : 357–383.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. 1991 Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization : A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bankes, G. 1985 The Manufacture and Circulation of Paddle and Anvil Pottery on the North Coast of Peru. World Archaeology 17 : 269–277.Google Scholar
Bedaux, R. 1986 Recherches Ethno-Archeologiques sur la Poterie des Dogon (Mali). In Op Zoek Naar Mens en Materiele Cultuur : Feestbundel Aangeboden aan J.D. van der Waals ter Gelegenheid van Zijn Emeritaat, edited by Fokkens, H., Banga, P., and Bierma, M., pp. 117–146. Universiteitsdrukkerij RUG, Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bedaux, R. 1987 Aspects of Life-Span of Dogon Pottery. University of Leiden Newsletter of the Department of Pottery Technology 5 : 137–153.Google Scholar
Birmingham, J. 1975 Traditional Potters of the Kathmandu Valley : An Ethnoarchaeological Study. Man (new series) 10 : 370–386.Google Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1991 Why Decorate a Pot? Midwestern Household Pottery, 200 B.C.-A.D. 600. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10 : 360–397.Google Scholar
Calder, A. M. 1972 Cracked Pots and Rubbish Tips : An Ethnoarchaeological Investigation of Vessel and Sherd Distribution in a Thai-Lao Village. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
David, N. 1972 On the Life Span of Pottery, Type Frequencies, and Archaeological Inference. American Antiquity 37 : 141–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, N., and Hennig, H. 1972 The Ethnography of Pottery : A Fulani Case Seen in Archaeological Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Deal, M. 1983 Pottery Ethnoarchaeology among the Tzeltal Maya. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Deal, M., and Hagstrum, M. B. 1995 Ceramic Reuse Behavior among the Maya and Wanka : Implications for Archaeology. In Expanding Archaeology, edited by Skibo, J., Walker, W., and Nielsen, A., pp. 111–125. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W. R. 1974 Ceramic Longevity and Archaeological Interpretation : An Example from the Upper Ucayali, Peru. American Antiquity 39 : 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoer, W. R. 1983 The Archaeological Record as Preserved Death Assemblage. In Archaeological Hammers and Theories, edited by Moore, J. and Keene, A., pp. 19–36. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W. R. 1985 Pots and Pans Do Not Speak, Nor Do They Lie : The Case for Occasional Reductionism. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B., pp. 347–357. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W. R., and Lathrap, D. 1979 The Making and Breaking of Shipibo-Conibo Ceramics. In Ethnoarchaeology : Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, edited by Kramer, C., pp 102–138. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
de la Torre, A., and Mudar, K. M. 1982 The Becino Site : An Exercise in Ethnoarchaeology. In Houses Built on Scattered Poles : Prehistory and Ecology in Negros Oriental, Philippines, edited by Hutterer, K. and Macdonald, W., pp. 117–146. San Carlos University, Cebu City, Philippines.Google Scholar
Folorunso, C. A. 1992 La Poterie du Tiv : Etude Ethnographique a Ushongo. West African Journal of Archaeology 22 : 165–177.Google Scholar
Foster, G. M. 1960 Life-Expectancy of Utilitarian Pottery in Tzintzuntzan, Michoacan, Mexico. American Antiquity 25 : 606–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, C. 1986 The Palaeolithic Settlement of Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graves, M. W. 1985 Ceramic Design Variation Within a Kalinga Village : Temporal and Spatial Processes. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B., pp. 9–34. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, M. B. 1989 Technological Continuity and Change : Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology in the Peruvian Andes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., and Cannon, A. 1984 The Structure of Material Systems : Ethnoarchaeology in the Maya Highlands. Paper No. 3. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Irwin, G. 1977 The Emergence of Mailu as a Central Place in the Prehistory of Coastal Papua. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Kurita, K. 1983 Material Culture of the Pokot of Kenya With Special Reference to Circulation of Articles. African Study Monographs 3 : 87–104. University of Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1981 Kalinga Pottery : An Ethnoarchaeological Study. In Pattern of the Past : Studies in Honour of David Clarke, edited by Hodder, I., Isaac, G., and Hammond, N., pp. 49–66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1985 Pottery Use Life Among the Kalinga, Northern Luzon, the Philippines. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B., pp. 334–346. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Mayor, A. 1991-1992 La Duree de Vie des Ceramiques Africaines : Un Essai de Comprehension des Mecanismes. Bulletin du Centre Genevois d'Anthropologic 3 : 47–70.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. A. 1985 Reconstructing Ceramic Vessels and Their Systemic Context. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B., pp. 310–329. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. A. 1991 Ceramic Frequency and Use Life : A Highland Mayan Case in Cross-Cultural Perspective. In Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology, edited by Longacre, W., pp. 162–181. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Neupert, M. A., and Longacre, W. A. 1994 Informant Accuracy in Pottery Use-Life Studies : A Kalinga Example. In Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology : Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by Longacre, W. and Skibo, J., pp. 71–82. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Norusis, M. J. 1988 SPSS/PC+ V2.0 Base Manual for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2. SPSS, Chicago.Google Scholar
Okpopo, A. I. 1987 Pottery-Making in Igboland, Eastern Nigeria : An Ethno Archaeological Study. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 53 : 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, C. R. 1993 How Many Pots Make Five? An Historical Review of Pottery Quantification. Archaeometry 35 : 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A. 1979 La Cerdmica de los Tunebos : Un Estudio Etnologico. Fundacion de Investigaciones Arqueologicas Nacionales. Banco de la Republica, Bogota.Google Scholar
Pastron, A. G. 1974 Preliminary Ethnoarchaeological Investigations Among the Tarahumara. In Ethnoarchaeology, edited by Donnan, C. and Clewlow, C., pp. 93–114. UCLA Institute of Archaeology Monograph 4. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Plog, S. 1985 Estimating Vessel Orifice Diameters : Measurement Methods and Measurement Error. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B., pp. 243–253. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Potter, J. M., and Varien, M. D. 1993 Unpacking the Discard Equation. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Reid, K. C. 1984 Fire and Ice : New Evidence for the Production and Preservation of Late Archaic Fiber-Tempered Pottery in the Middle-Latitude Lowlands. American Antiquity 49 : 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, K. C. 1989 A Materials Science Perspective on Hunter-Gatherer Pottery. In Pottery Technology : Ideas and Approaches, edited by Bronitsky, G., pp. 167–180. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1987 Pottery Analysis : A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Senior, L. M., and Birnie, D. P. III 1995 Accurately Estimating Vessel Volume from Profile Illustrations. American Antiquity 60 : 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, M. J. 1989 On Tool Class Use Lives and the Formation of Archaeological Assemblages. American Antiquity 54 : 9–30.Google Scholar
Shott, M. J. 1992 On Recent Trends in the Anthropology of Foragers : Kalahari Revisionism and Its Archaeological Implications. Man (new series) 27 : 843–871.Google Scholar
Shott, M. J. 1996 Ceramic Vessel Use Life and Size : A Cross-Cultural Study. Manuscript on file, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, C. M. 1991 Approaches to Archaeological Ceramics. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Stanislawski, M. 1978 If Pots Were Mortal. In Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, edited by Gould, R. pp. 201–228. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Tani, M. 1994 Why Should More Pots Break in Larger Households? Mechanisms Underlying Population Estimates from Ceramics. In Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by Longacre, W. and Skibo, J., pp. 51–70. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Tani, M., and Longacre, W. A. 1994 On Methods of Measuring Ceramic Use-Life. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Weigand, P. C. 1969 Modern Huichol Ceramics. In Mesoamerican Studies. Research Records. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Wolf, F. M. 1986 Meta-Analysis : Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar