Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:41:04.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping Poverty Point

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tristram R. Kidder
Tristram R. Kidder*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though the general configuration of the Poverty Point site has been known for over forty years, the entire site was mapped for the first time in 1999–2000. In this paper we examine how Poverty Point has been portrayed in the archaeological literature. Tracings of stereoscopic aerial photographs were used to construct previous maps of the site. Features that could not be traced because of tree cover were interpolated. Succeeding representations of the site show different features and emphasize the symmetrical form of the site, including the presence of ridges separated by aisles. The 1999–2000 map demonstrates that earlier images of the site overemphasize earthworm symmetry. Our data suggest that the northern aisle does not exist and may have been introduced into earlier maps in order to complete a hypothesized regular site plan. Images of a site like Poverty Point are powerful representations of a perceived reality. For example, existing maps of Poverty Point have been used to bolster claims that the site represents a "great town," with a large population and some kind of centralized leadership. Despite a considerable history of research at Poverty Point map data alone cannot and probably will never provide sufficient evidence to support or reject such a claim. While mapping alone cannot answer questions about the nature of site organization or social behavior, differences between existing images and the current topographic map underscore the need to view maps and pictures of Poverty Point as a means for generating testable hypotheses, rather than an end unto itself.

Résumé

Résumé

Aunque la configuración general del sitio de Poverty Point se conoce desde hace más de cuarenta años, el sitio completo fue mapeado por primera vez en 1999–2000. En este trabajo examinamos la forma en que Poverty Point ha sido representado en la literatura arqueológica. Se utilizaron trazos de fotografías aéreas estereoscópicas para construir los mapas previos del sitio, los rasgos que no pudieron ser trazados a causa de la cubierta boscosa fueron interpolados. Las sucesivas representaciones del sitio muestran diferentes rasgos y enfatizan su forma simétrica, incluyendo la presencia de elevaciones separadas porpasillos. El mapa de 1999–2000 muestra que las imágenes anteriores del sitio exageran la simétria de las modificaciones artificiales del terreno. Nuestros datos sugieren que el pasillo norte no existe y que fue incluido en mapas anteriores para completar un hipotetico piano regular del sitio. Las imágenes de un sitio como Poverty Point son representaciones poderosamente sugerentes de la realidad que se quiere percibir Por ejemplo, los mapas existentes de Poverty Point han sido utilizados para sustentar afirmaciones de que el sitio representa un "pueblo grande", con una poblacion amplia y alguna forma de autoridad centralizada. A pesar de una larga historia de investigation en Poverty Point, los datos provenientes de mapas no pueden y probablemente nunca podrdn proporcionar suficiente evidencia para apoyar o rechazar semejantes afirmaciones. Si bien es cierto que el mapeo por sí solo no puede resolver interrogantes sobre el tipo de organización del sitio o sobre su comportamiento social, las diferencias entre las imágenes existentes y el mapa topográfico actual subrayan la necesidad de ver los mapas y las imágenes de Poverty Point como una forma de generar hipótesis verificables, mas que como un fin en sí mismo.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brecher, K. S., and Haag, W. G. 1980 The Poverty Point Octagon: World's Largest Prehistoric Solstice Marker? Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 12:886.Google Scholar
Connolly, R. P. 1999 1999 Annual Report: Station Archaeology Program at Poverty Point State Commemorative Area. Louisiana Division of Archaeology, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Fagan, B. M. 1995 Ancient North America: The Archaeology of a Continent. 2nd ed. Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Fagan, B. M. 1998 People of the Earth. 9th ed. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
Fiedel, S. J. 1992 Prehistory of the Americas. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1954 Additional Notes on the Poverty Point Site in Northern Louisiana. American Antiquity 19:282–285.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1969 A Comparison of Formative Cultures in the Americas: Diffusion or the Psychic Unity of Man. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 11. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., and Webb, C. H. 1956 Poverty Point, a Late Archaic Site in Louisiana. Anthropological Papers Vol. 46, Pt. 1. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. 1970 Intersite Variability at Poverty Point: Some Preliminary Considerations on lapidary. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 12:13–20.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. 1973 Social Systems at Poverty Point: An Analysis of Intersite and Intrasite Variability. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. 1974 The Rise and Decline of Poverty Point. Louisiana Archaeology 1:8–33.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. 1984 The Earthen Face of Civilization: Mapping and Testing at Poverty Point, 1983. Office of the State Archaeologist, 1987a The Ground Truth About Poverty Point: The Second Season, 1985. Center for Archaeological Studies Report 7. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 1987b The Poverty Point Earthworks Reconsidered. Mississippi Archaeology 22(2): 14–31.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 1989 Digging on the Dock of the Bay(ou): The 1988 Excavations at Poverty Point. Center for Archaeological Studies Report 8. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge. 1990 Search for the Lost Sixth Ridge: The 1989 Excavations at Poverty Point. Center for Archaeological Studies Report 9. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge, 1991 Lost and Found: The Sixth Ridge at Poverty Point. Mississippi Archaeology 26(2):56–64.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 1993 In Helona's Shadow: Excavations in the Western Rings at Poverty Point, 1991. Center for Archaeological Studies Report 11. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 1994 Cool Dark Woods, Poison Ivy, and Maringoins: The Baton Rouge. 1993 Excavations at Poverty Point, Louisiana. Center for Archaeological Studies Report 12. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 1999 Poverty Point: A Terminal Archaic Culture in the Lower Mississippi Valley. 2nd ed. Anthropological Study 7. Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism, Louisiana Archaeological Survey and Antiquities Commission, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Baton, Rouge 2000 The Ancient Mounds of Poverty Point: Place of Rings. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L., and Saunders, J. W. 1993 The Death of the South Sixth Ridge at Poverty Point: What Can We Do? SAA Bulletin 11(5):7–9.Google Scholar
Golden, Software 1997 Surfer for Windows Version 6.0. Golden Software, Inc., Golden, CO.Google Scholar
Haag, W. G. 1990 Excavations at the Poverty Point Site: 1972-1975. Louisiana Archaeology 13:1–36.Google Scholar
Hillman, M. M. 1990 1985 Test Excavations of the “Dock” Area of Poverty Point. Louisiana Archaeology 13:133–149.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. E. 1986 Sedentism and Hunter-Gatherer Adaptations in the Lower Mississippi Valley: Subsistence Strategies During the Poverty Point Period. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Agogino, G. 1991a Bottomland Resources and Exploitation Strategies During the Poverty Point Period: Implications of the Archaeobiological Record from the J. W. Copes Site. In The Poverty Point Culture: Local Manifestations, Subsistence Practices, and Trade Networks, edited by Byrd, K. M., pp. 131–157. Geoscience and Man 29. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Agogino, G. 1991b The Trade Fair in Hunter-Gatherer Interaction: The Role of Intersocietal Trade in the Evolution of Poverty Point Culture. In Between Bands and States, edited by Gregg, S. A., pp. 265–286. Occasional Papers 9. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Moore, C. B. 1913 Some Aboriginal Sites in Louisiana and Arkansas. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 16:7–99.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. N. 1999 Precolumbian Architecture in Eastern North America. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Nabokov, P., and Easton, R. 1989 Native American Architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Neuman, R. W. 1984 An Introduction to Louisiana Archaeology. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C. 1993 Archaeology: The Historical Development of Civilizations. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. M. 1997 Images of the Past. 2nd ed. Mayfield Publishing, Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
Purrington, R. D. 1983 Supposed Solar Alignments at Poverty Point. American Antiquity 48:157–161.Google Scholar
Purrington, R. D” and Child, C. A. 1989 Poverty Point Revisited: Further Consideration of Astronomical Alignments. Journal for the History of Astronomy 13:49–60.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, and Bahn, P. 1996 Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice. 2nd ed. Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Sever, T., and Wiseman, J. 1985 Remote Sensing and Archaeology: Potential for the Future, Report on a Conference, March 1-2,1984. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Earth Resources Laboratory, National Space Technology Laboratories, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.Google Scholar
Time Life, Books 1992 Mound Builders and Cliff Dwellers. Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia.Google Scholar
Webb, C. H. 1968 The Extent and Content of Poverty Point Culture. American Antiquity 33:297–321.Google Scholar
Webb, C. H. 1970 Intrasite Distribution of Artifacts at the Poverty Point Site, with Special Reference to Women's and Men's Activities. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 12:21–34.Google Scholar
Webb, C. H. 1977 The Poverty Point Culture. Geoscience and Man 17. Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Webb, C. H. 1982 The Poverty Point Culture. Geoscience and Man 17.2nd ed., revised. Geoscience Publications, Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Wenke, R. J. 1999 Patterns in Prehistory: Humankind's First Three Million Years. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1957 Review of Poverty Point, A Late Archaic Site in Louisiana, by Ford, J.A. and Webb, C.H.. American Antiquity 23:198–199.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1966 An Introduction to American Archaeology. Vol. I. North and Middle America. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar