Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T20:02:32.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mapping Clovis: Projectile Points, Behavior, and Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mary M. Prasciunas
Mary M. Prasciunas*
Affiliation:
WestLand Resources, Inc., Tucson, AZ ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distribution of Clovis projectile points across North America demonstrates distinct spatial patterning that has the potential to inform on many aspects of the colonization process. However, before accurate inferences regarding prehistoric behavior can be drawn from projectile point distributional databases, it is necessary to account for biases potentially affecting point visibility. Using county-level data for a sample of states from the western and southeastern U.S., this paper demonstrates that Clovis projectile point distribution is significantly related to modern population density, cultivated acreage, intensity of archaeological research, and measures of environmental productivity. Interpreting Clovis projectile point distribution is therefore more complex than frequently assumed.

Resumen

Resumen

La distribución de puntas de proyectil Clovis a través de Norteamérica muestra patrones espaciales distintivos que tienen el potencial de revelar sobre muchos aspectos del proceso de colonización. Sin embargo, antes de que se puedan obtener inferencias correctas sobre el comportamiento prehistórico a partir de los datos de distribución de puntas de proyectil, es necesario tener en cuenta los sesgos que puedan afectar el análisis distributivo.. Usando como ejemplo los datos a nivel de condados de los estados del oeste y el sudoeste de los Estados Unidos, este trabajo revela que la distribución de puntas de proyectil tipo Clovis está relacionada de manera importante con la densidad poblacional moderna, los acres cultivados, la intensidad de la investigación arqueológica, y las mediciones de la productividad ambiental. La interpretación de la distribución de puntas de proyectil Clovis, es por lo tanto más compieja que lo que frecuentemente se supone.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 107 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, Jonathan 1998 North America during the Last 150,000 Years. Electronic document, http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercNORTHAMERICA.html, accessed November 5, 2011.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M., Donahue, J., and Stuckenrath, Robert 1990 The Meadowcroft Rockshelter Radiocarbon Chronology 1975–1990. American Antiquity 55:348–354.Google Scholar
Amick, Daniel S. 1996 Regional Patterns of Folsom Mobility and Land Use in the American Southwest. World Archaeology 27:41–426.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G. 1990a A North American Paleoindian Projectile Point Database. Current Research in the Pleistocene 7:67–69.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G. 1990b The Paleoindian Colonization of Eastern North America: A View from the Southeastern United States. In Early Paleoindian Economies of Eastern North America, edited by Kenneth B. Tankersley and Barry L. Isaac, pp. 163–216. Research in Economic Anthropology 5. Jai Press Inc, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G., and Faught, Michael K. 1998 The Distribution of Fluted Paleoindian Projectile Points: Update 1998. Archaeology of Eastern North America 26:163–187.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G., and Faught, Michael K. 2000 Paleoindian Artifact Distributions: Evidence and Implications. Antiquity 74:507–513.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G., and Gillam, Christopher 2000 Paleoindian Colonization of the Americas: Implications from an Examination of Physiology, Demography, and Artifact Distribution. American Antiquity 65:43–66.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G., Shane Miller, D., Yerka, Stephen J., and Faught, Michael K. 2005 Paleoindian Database of the Americas: 2005 Status Report. Current Research in the Pleistocene Vol. 22:91–92.Google Scholar
Bement, Leland C., and Carter, Brian J. 2003 Clovis Bison Hunting at the Jake Bluff Site, NW Oklahoma. Current Research in the Pleistocene 20:5–7.Google Scholar
Bever, Michael R., and Meltzer, David J. 2007 Investigating Variation in Clovis Paleoindian Life-ways: the Third Revised Edition of the Texas Clovis Fluted Point Survey. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 78:65–99.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 2001 Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Ethnographic and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R., and Johnson, Amber L. 2006 Program for Calculating Environmental and Hunter-Gatherer Frames of Reference (EnvCalc2). Java Version, August 2006.Google Scholar
Blackmar, Jeannette M. 2001 Regional Variability in Clovis, Folsom, and Cody Land Use. Plains Anthropologist 46:65–94.Google Scholar
Boldurian, Anthony T. 2006 A Clovis Fluted Point from Coastal Waters in Southern New Jersey. North American Archaeologist 27:245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldurian, Anthony T., and Cotter, John L. 1999 Clovis Revisited: New Perspectives on Paleoindian Adaptations from Blackwater Draw, New Mexico. University Museum Monograph 103. The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Brennan, Louis A. 1982 A Compilation of Fluted Points of Eastern North America by Count and Distribution: An AENA Project. Archaeology of Eastern North America 10:27–46.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Briggs 2003 The Effects of Sample Bias on Paleoindian Fluted Point Recovery in the United States. North American Archaeologist 24:311–338.Google Scholar
Charles, Tommy, and Michie, James L. 1992 South Carolina Paleo Point Database. In Paleoindian and Early Archaic Research in the Lower Southeast: A South Carolina Perspective, edited by David G. Anderson, Chris Judge, and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 381–389. Council of South Carolina Professional Archaeologists, Columbia.Google Scholar
Collins, Michael B. 1999 Clovis Blade Technology. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Copeland, James M., and Fike, Richard E. 1988 Fluted Projectile Points in Utah. Utah Archaeology 1988:5–28.Google Scholar
Daniel, I. Randolph, and Goodyear, Albert C. 2006 An Update on the North Carolina Paleoindian Point Survey. Current Research in the Pleistocene 23:88–90.Google Scholar
Di Peso, Charles C. 1953 Clovis Fluted Points from Southeastern Arizona. American Antiquity 19:82–85.Google Scholar
Dorwin, J. T. 1966 Fluted Points and Late Pleistocene Geochronology in Indiana. Indiana Historical Society, Prehistory Research Series 4:145–188.Google Scholar
Dragoo, Don W. 1976 Some Aspects of Eastern North American Prehistory: A Review 1975. American Antiquity 41:3–27.Google Scholar
Faught, Michael K. 1996 Clovis Origins and Underwater Prehistoric Archaeology in Northwestern Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Faught, Michael K., Anderson, David G., and Gisiger, A. 1994 North American Paleoindian Database: An Update. Current Research in the Pleistocene 11:32–35.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Jenkins, Dennis L., Gotherstrom, Ander, Naveran, Nuria, Sanchez, Juan J., Hofreiter, Michael, Thomsen, Philip Francis, Binladen, Jonas, Highham, Thomas F. G., Yohe, Robert M. II, Parr, Robert, Cummings, Linda Scott, and Willerslev, Eske 2008 DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320:786–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodyear, Albert C. 2005 Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States. In Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, edited by Robson Bonnichsen, Bradley T. Lepper, Dennis Stanford, and Michael R. Waters, pp. 103–112. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C. 2006 Recognizing the Redstone Fluted Point in the South Carolina Paleoindian Point Database. Current Research in the Pleistocene 23:100–103.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C III, Michie, James L., and Charles, Tommy 1990 The Earliest South Carolinians: The Paleoindian Occupation of South Carolina. Occasional Papers 2. Archaeological Society of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Marcus J. 2008 Quantifying Clovis Dynamics: Confronting Theory with Models and Data across Scales. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Haynes, C., Vance, 1983 Fluted Points in the East and West. Archaeology of Eastern North America 11:24–27.Google Scholar
Hofman, Jack L., and Hesse, India S. 2002 Clovis in Kansas. In TER-QUA Symposium Series Volume 3, edited by Wakefield Dort, Jr, pp. 15–36. Nebraska Academy of Sciences, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Hofman, Jack L., and Wyckoff, Don G. 1991 Clovis Occupation in Oklahoma. Current Research in the Pleistocene 8:29–31.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 2001 Clovis Mobility and Lithic Procurement on the Central Great Plains of North America. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 2003 Clovis Projectile Points and Preforms in Nebraska: Distribution and Lithic Sources. Current Research in the Pleistocene 20:31–33.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 2006 Taphonomy of Two Last Glacial Maximum Marnmoth Sites in the Central Great Plains of North America: a Preliminary Report on La Sena and Lovewell. Quaternary International 142–143:30–43.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 2007a Clovis Lithic Procurement and Mobility on the High Plains of Eastern Colorado. Paper Presented at the 72nd Annual Society for American Archaeology Meeting, April 25–29, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 2007b The Age and Taphonomy of Mammoths at Lovewell Reservoir, Jewell County, Kansas, USA. Quaternary International 169–170:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckell, Bruce B. 1984 The Paleoindian and Archaic Occupation of the Tucson Basin: An Overview. The Kiva 49:133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckell, Bruce B. 2004 Clovis in the Southwestern United States. In New Perspectives on the First Americans, edited by Bradley T. Lepper and Robson Bonnichsen, pp. 93–101. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A & M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Huckell, Bruce B., Holliday, Vance T., and Weber, Robert H. 2007 Test Investigations at the Mockingbird Gap Clovis Site: Results of the 2006 Field Season. Current Research in the Pleistocene 24:102–104.Google Scholar
Huckell, Bruce B., Holliday, Vance T., and Weber, Robert H. 2008 The Mockingbird Gap Clovis Site: 2007 Investigations. Current Research in the Pleistocene 25:95–97.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Dennis L. 2007 Distribution and Dating of Cultural and Paleontological Remains at the Paisley Five Mile Point Caves in the Northern Great Basin. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, pp. 57–81. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Thomas F. 1966 The Distribution and Implications of Fluted Points in Saskatchewan. American Antiquity 31:530–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Robert L., and Todd, Lawrence C. 1988 Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity 53:717–734.Google Scholar
Kidd, Kenneth E. 1951 Fluted Points in Ontario. American Antiquity 16:260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Largent, Floyd B., Waters, Michael R., and Carlson, David L. 1991 The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Characteristics of Folsom Projectile Points in Texas. Plains Anthropologist 36:323–340.Google Scholar
Lepper, Bradley T. 1983 Fluted Point Distributional Patterns in the Eastern United States: A Contemporary Phenomenon. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 8:269–285.Google Scholar
Lepper, Bradley T. 1985 The Effects of Cultivation and Collecting on Ohio Fluted Point Finds: A Reply to Seeman and Prufer. Mid-continental Journal of Archaeology 10:241–250.Google Scholar
Lewis, Thomas M. N. 1953 The Paleoindian Problem in Tennessee. Tennessee Archaeologist 9:38–40.Google Scholar
McAvoy, J.M. and McAvoy, L.D. 1997 Archaeological Investigations of Site 48SX202, Cactus Hill, Sussex County, VA. Research Report Series No. 8, Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Richmond.Google Scholar
McCary, Ben C. 1947 A Survey and Study of Folsom-like Points Found in Virginia. Quarterly Bulletin, Archaeological Society of Virginia 2.Google Scholar
McLean, Janice A. 2002 Beyond 12 Mile Creek: Other Paleoamerican Evidence from Logan and Wallace Counties, Kansas. Current Research in the Pleistocene 19:64–67.Google Scholar
McLean, Janice A., and Peter, Jason 2004 New Paleoindian Evidence from East-Central Kansas. Current Research in the Pleistocene 21:65–67.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S. 1973 The Discovery of America. Science 279:969–974.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S. 1984 Prehistoric Overkill: The Global Model. In Quaternary Extinctions: A Prehistoric Revolution, edited by P. S. Martin and R. G. Klein, pp. 354–403. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Mason, Ronald J. 1958 Late Pleistocene Geochronology and the Paleo-Indian Penetration of the Lower Michigan Peninsula. Anthropological Paper No. 11. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mason, Ronald J. 1962 The Paleo-Indian Tradition in Eastern North America. Current Anthropology 3:227–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, David J. 1986a The Clovis Paleoindian Occupation of Texas: Results of the Texas Clovis Fluted Point Survey. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society 57:27–68.Google Scholar
Meltzer, David J. 1986b A Study of Texas Clovis Points. Current Research in the Pleistocene 3:33–36.Google Scholar
Meltzer, David J. 1988 Late Pleistocene Human Adaptations in Eastern North America. Journal of World Prehistory 2:1–52.Google Scholar
Meltzer, David J. 2002 What Do You Do When No One's Been there Before? Thoughts on the Colonization of New Lands. In The First Americans: The Pleistocene Colonization of the New World, edited by N. G. Jablonski, pp. 27–58. Wattis Symposium Series in Anthropology, Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, Number 27, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Meltzer, David J., and Bever, Michael R. 1995 Paleoindians of Texas: An Update on the Texas Clovis Fluted Point Survey. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological Society 66:47–81.Google Scholar
Morrow, Juliet E., and Morrow, Toby A. 1999 Geographic Variation in Fluted Projectile Points: A Hemispheric Perspective. American Antiquity 64:215–231.Google Scholar
Mossiman, James E. and Martin, Paul S. 1975 Simulating Overkill by Paleoindians. American Scientist 63:304–313.Google Scholar
Overstreet, David F. 2005 Late-Glacial Ice-Marginal Adaptation in Southeastern Wisconsin. In Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, edited by Robson Bonnichsen, Bradley T. Lepper, Dennis Stanford, and Michael R. Waters, pp. 183–195. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Peck, Rodney M. 1988 Clovis Points of Early Man in North Carolina. The Piedmont Journal of Archaeology 6:1–22.Google Scholar
Perkinson, Phil H. 1971 North Carolina Fluted Points: Survey Report Number One. Southern Indian Studies 23:3–40.Google Scholar
Perkinson, Phil H. 1973 North Carolina Fluted Projectile Points: Survey Report Number Two. Southern Indian Studies 25:3–60.Google Scholar
Prasciunas, Mary M., and Denoyer, Allen 2007 Clovis Occupation of the Central Colorado High Country. Current Research in the Pleistocene 24:136–138 Google Scholar
Prasciunas, Mary M., Frison, George C., Kornfeld, Marcel, Miller, Mark E., and Sutter, Steven J. 2008 Clovis in Wyoming. Current Research in the Pleistocene 25:135–138.Google Scholar
Prufer, Olaf H., and Baby, Raymond S. 1963 Palaeo-Indians of Ohio. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Purdy, Barbara A. 1982 Comments on “A Compilation of Fluted Points of Eastern North America by Count and Distribution: An AENA Project.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 11:29.Google Scholar
Quimby, George I. 1958 Fluted Points and Geochronology of the Lake Michigan Basin. American Antiquity 19:317–331.Google Scholar
Rolingson, Marth A. 1964 Paleo-Indian Culture in Kentucky: A Study Based on Projectile Points. Studies in Anthropology, No. 2, University of Kentucky Press. Lexington.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Christopher A. 2006 A Question of Bias in the North American Fluted-Point Sample. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Department of Anthropology, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., and Prufer, Olaf H. 1982 An Updated Distribution of Ohio Fluted Points. Mid-continental Journal of Archaeology 7:155–169.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F., and Prufer, Olaf H. 1984 The Effects of Cultivation and Collecting on Ohio Fluted Point Finds: A Cautionary Note. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 9:227–233.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 2002 Sample Bias in the Distribution and Abundance of Midwestern Fluted Bifaces. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 27:89–123.Google Scholar
Stanford, Dennis, and Bradley, Bruce 2000 The Solutiean Solution: Did Some Ancient Americans Come From Europe? Scientific American Discovering Archaeology 2:54–55.Google Scholar
Steele, James, Adams, Jonathan, and Sluckin, Tim 1998 Modeling Paleoindian Dispersals. World Archaeology 30:286–305.Google Scholar
Tankersley, Kenneth B., Smith, Edward E., and Cochran, Donald R. 1990 Early Paleoindian Land Use, Mobility, and Lithic Exploitation Patterns: An Updated Distribution of Fluted Points in Indiana. North American Archaeologist 11:301–319.Google Scholar
Taylor, Amanda K. 2003a Results of a Great Basin Fluted-Point Survey. Current Research in the Pleistocene 20:77–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, Amanda K. 2003b The Great Basin Fluted Point Database. Electronic document, http://pidba.utk.edu/content/greafbastn_flutedpointsurvey_taylor2003.xls accessed November 5, 2010.Google Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau 2000 Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1). GCT-PH1: Population, Housing Units, Area, and Density. Electronic document, http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable.* Google Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau 2006 Population Division, Population Estimates by County. Electronic document, http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/CO-EST2006-01.html, accessed November 5, 2010.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture 2002 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Geographic Area Series, State-County Data, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Electronic document, http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp.Google Scholar
Waring, A. J. Jr. 1961 Fluted Points on the South Carolina Coast. American Antiquity 26:550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Williams, and Stoltman, James B. 1965 An Outline of Southeastern United States Prehistory with Particular Emphasis on the Paleo-Indian Era. In Quaternary of the United States, edited by H. E. Wright and David G. Frey, pp.669–684. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Williams, John W, Shuman, Bryan N., Webb, Thompson III, Bartlein, Patrick J., and Leduc, Phillip L. 2004 Late Quaternary Vegetation Dynamics in North America: Scaling from TaxatoBiomes. Ecological Monographs 74:309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyckoff, Don G., and Rippy, Charles 1998 Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene People and Animals in Tulsa County: Some Preliminary Results. Oklahoma Anthropological Society Bulletin 47:5–37.Google Scholar