Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:02:04.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historical Implications of a Pattern of Dates at Piedras Negras, Guatemala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tatiana Proskouriakoff
Tatiana Proskouriakoff*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution of Washington, Cambridge, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inscriptions at Piedras Negras are shown to form a pattern of discrete sets of records, each inscribed on a group of consecutive monuments beginning with a stela depicting the “ascension motif.” The earliest date in a series, identified by the upended frog glyph and called an “initial date” precedes the first dedicatory date by a number of years, falling within the span of an earlier series. A date in the first dedicatory hotun of each set is marked by a “toothache glyph” and is called the “inaugural date.” The intervals between these dates are such that no single series exceeds the span of a reasonable lifetime, and it is suggested that the initial date represents something in the nature of a birth or name day of a ruler who accedes to power on the inaugural date, and that each set of monuments records the history of a reign. The representations on monuments are interpreted as portraits of rulers and their families. Initial and inaugural dates at other sites are identified by their respective glyphs, but no articulated series of reigns has been found outside of Piedras Negras.

The variations of the upended frog and toothache glyphs suggest that they are essentially verbal action glyphs. Other action glyphs are correlated with motifs on Yaxchilan lintels, where they follow close upon date notations. Groups of glyphs following the action glyph are identified as appellatives, and are found to contain feminine head prefixes when they refer to robed or skirted figures of women. It is suggested that “ben-ich” katun notations occurring with appellatives of rulers are to be counted from their initial dates. Lunar and determinant meanings ascribed to dates are shown to have no relation to action glyphs accompanying them, and the historical approach is recommended as being more consistent with observed glyphic patterns.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , April 1960 , pp. 454 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, E. W. 1942 The Inscription on Stela 38, Piedras Negras, El Peten, Guatemala. American Antiquity, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 364–8. Menasha.Google Scholar
Barthel, T. S. 1955 Versuch über die Inschriften von Chich'en Itzáviejo. Baessler-Archiv, n.s., Vol. 3, pp. 5–33. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berlin, Heinrich 1958 El glifo “emblema” en las inscripciones mayas. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, n.s., Vol. 47, pp. 111–9. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, G. B. 1902 The Hieroglyphic Stairway, Ruins of Copan. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 1, No. 6. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knorozov, Y. V. 1958a New Data on the Maya Written Language. Proceedings of the Thirty-second International Congress of Americanists [Copenhagen, 1956], pp. 467–75. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Knorozov, Y. V. 1958b The Problem of the Study of the Maya Hieroglyphic Writing. American Antiquity, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 284–91. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ludendorff, Hans 1930–43 Untersuchungen zur Astronomie der Maya, 1-15. Sitzungsberichten der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin.Google Scholar
Maler, Teobert 1901 Researches in the Central Portion of the Usumacintla Valley. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 2, No. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maudslay, A. P. 1889–1902 Archaeology, 5 volumes. Biologia Centrali-Americana. London.Google Scholar
Morley, S. G. 1937–38 The Inscriptions of Peten, 5 volumes. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 437. Washington.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana 1944 An Inscription on a Jade Probably Carved at Piedras Negras. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Notes on Middle American Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 47. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana 1950 A Study of Classic Maya Sculpture. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 593. Washington.Google Scholar
Roys, R. L. 1933 The Book of Chilam Balam of Chumayel. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 438. Washington.Google Scholar
Roys, R. L. 1940 Personal Names of the Maya of Yucatan. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 523, Contributions to American Anthropology and History, No. 31. Washington.Google Scholar
Ruppert, Karl, Thompson, J. E. S., and Proskouriakoff, Tatiana 1955 Bonampak, Chiapas, Mexico. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 602. Washington.Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, Linton Jr. 1947 Concepts and Structures of Maya Calendrical Arithmetics. Joint Publications of the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Anthropological Society, No. 3. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Teeple, J. E. 1930 Maya Astronomy. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 403, Contributions to American Archaeology, No. 2. Washington.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1943 The Initial Series of Stela 14, Piedras Negras, Guatemala, and a Date on Stela 19, Naranjo, Guatemala. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Notes on Middle American Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 18. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1944a The Dating of Seven Monuments at Piedras Negras. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Notes on Middle American Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 39. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1944b Jottings on Inscriptions at Copan. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Notes on Middle American Archaeology and Ethnology, No. 38. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. E. S. 1950 Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Introduction. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 589. Washington.Google Scholar
Tozzer, A. M. 1941 Landa's Relación de las Cosas de Yucatan. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 18. Cambridge.Google Scholar