Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:20:15.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hierarchy and Heterarchy in the American Southwest: A Comment on Mcguire and Saitta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alison E. Rautman
Alison E. Rautman*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

McGuire and Saitta (1996) give voice to widespread dissatisfaction with artificial dichotomies that lead to the classification of historic and late Prehispanic puebloan societies as “egalitarian” or “hierarchical” in organization. They suggest a solution, a dialectical approach, that rejects processual archaeology in general, although not in its entirety. Another alternative approach, proposed here, relies on the concept of heterarchy (e.g., Crumley 1994), which, surprisingly, has not yet been used in southwestern archaeology. The proposed use of this concept does not involve rejection of a processual framework or represent a comprehensive critique of McGuire and Saitta's proposed dialectical approach.

Résumé

Résumé

McGuire y Saitta (1996) han expresado insatisfacción con dicotomías artificiales que han dado lugar a la clasificación de la organización de sociedades Pueblo históricas y prehispánicas tardías como “iugalitarias” o “jerdrquicas.” Estos autores sugieren, como solucion, un acercamiento diaUctico que en general rechaza la arqueología procesual, mas no en su totalidad. Una alternativa, la cual aquí presentamos, se basa en el concepto de “heteraquía” (e.g., Crumley 1994), que, sorprendentemente, aún no se ha aplicado a la arqueología del suroeste norteamericano. El uso de este concepto, que aqui proponemos, no implica el rechazo de un marco teórico procesual, ni representa una crítica comprensiva del acercamiento dialéctico propuesto por McGuire y Saitta.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 325 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Barth, F. 1978 Conclusions. In Scale and Social Organization, edited by Barth, F., pp. 253–274. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., 1996 Agency, Ideology, and Power in Archaeological Theory: (Part I). A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37: 1–87.Google Scholar
Brandt, E. A. 1994 Egalitarianism, Hierarchy, and Centralization in the Pueblos. In The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, edited by Wills, W. H. and Leonard, R.D. pp. 9–24. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M. 1994 Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World: An Introduction. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, edited by Brumfiel, E. M. and Fox, J.W. pp. 3–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M. 1995 Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies: Comments. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 125–131. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Clark, J. E., and Blake, M. 1994 The Power of Prestige: Competitive Generosity and the Emergence of Rank Societies in Lowland Mesoamerica. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, edited by Brumfiel, E. M. and Fox, J.W. pp. 17–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Creamer, W. 1996 Developing Complexity in the American Southwest: Constructing a Model for the Rio Grande Valley. In Emergent Complexity: The Evolution of Intermediate Societies, edited by Arnold, J. E., pp. 91–106. International Monographs in Prehistory. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. L. 1979 Three Locational Models: An Epistemological Assessment of Anthropology and Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 2, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 141–173. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. L. 1994 Historical Ecology: A Multidimensional Ecological Orientation. In Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes, edited by Crumley, C. L., pp. 1–17. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. L. 1995 Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 1–6. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. 1987 Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, R. M. 1995 Early Metalworking: A Heterarchical Analysis of Industrial Organization. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 33-10. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Feinman, G., and Neitzel, J. 1984 Too Many Types: An Overview of Sedentary Prestate Societies in the Americas. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 7, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 39–102. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1972 The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 399–426.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. 1992 Complexity and Complex Adaptive Systems. In The Evolution of Human Languages, edited by Hawkins, J. and Gell, M.-Mann, pp. 3–18. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings Vol. 11. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, F., and Tsing, A. L. 1990 Introduction. In Uncertain Terms: Negotiating Gender in American Culture, edited by Ginsburg, F. and Tsing, A.L. pp. 1–18. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Hastorf, C. A. 1990 One Path to the Heights: Negotiating Political Inequality in the Sausa of Peru. In The Evolution of Political Systems: Sociopolitics in Small-Scale Sedentary Societies, edited by Upham, S., pp. 146–176. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. 1994 Chiefdom Rivalries, Control, and External Contacts in Lower Central America. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, edited by Brumfiel, E. M. and Fox, J.W. pp. 55–60. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A. 1982 Organizational Structure and Scalar Stress. In Theory and Explanation in Archaeology, edited by Renfrew, C., M. J. Rowlands, and B. A. Seagraves, pp. 389^121. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. 1974 Etoro Social Structure: A Study in Structural Contradiction. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kohler, T. A. 1993 News from the North American Southwest: Prehistory on the Edge of Chaos. Journal of Archaeological Research 1(4): 267–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekson, S. H 1997 Rewriting Southwestern Prehistory. Archaeology 50: 52–55.Google Scholar
Levy, J. E. 1995 Heterarchy in Bronze Age Denmark: Settlement Pattern, Gender, and Ritual. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 41–54. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Lightfoot, K., and Upham, S. 1989 Complex Societies in the Prehistoric Southwest: A Consideration of the Controversy. In The Sociopolitical Structure of Prehistoric Southwestern Societies, edited by Upham, S., K. G. Lightfoot, and R. A. Jewett, pp. 3–32. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Marcus, J., and Flannery, K. V. 1996 Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in Mexico's Oaxaca Valley. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. H. 1983 Breaking Down Cultural Complexity: Inequality and Heterogeneity. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 6, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 91–142. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. H., and Saitta, D. J. 1996 Although They Have Petty Captains, They Obey Them Badly: The Dialectics of Prehispanic Western Pueblo Social Organization. American Antiquity 61: 197–216.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. A. 1995 Complexity, Hierarchy, and Scale: A Controlled Comparison between Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, and La Quemada, Zacatecas. American Antiquity 60: 597–618.Google Scholar
Neitzel, J. 1994 Boundary Dynamics in the Chacoan Regional System. In The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, edited by Wills, W. H. and Leonard, R.D. pp. 209–240. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Potter, D. R., and King, E. M. 1995 A Heterarchical Approach to Lowland Maya Socioeconomics. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 17–32. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Rautman, A. E. 1997 The Pithouse to Pueblo Transition in the American Southwest: Implications for Gender Roles. In Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, edited by Claassen, C. and Joyce, R.A. pp. 100–118. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rautman, A. E., and Talalay, L. E. 1997 Introduction: Diverse Approaches to the Study of Gender in Archaeology. In Interpreting the Body: Insights from Anthropological and Classical Archaeology, edited by Rautman, A. E.. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, and Cherry, J. F. (editors) 1986 Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. J. 1995 Tribes as Heterarchy: A Case Study from the Prehistoric Southeastern United States. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 7–16. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Saitta, D. J. 1997 Power, Labor, and the Dynamics of Change in the Chacoan Political Economy. American Antiquity 62: 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, T. D. 1978 The Size and Shape of a Culture. In Scale and Social Organization, edited by Barth, F., pp. 215–252. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Small, D. B. 1995 Heterarchical Paths to Evolution: The Role of External Economies. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 71–86. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Spencer, C. S. 1994 Factional Ascendance, Dimensions of Leadership, and the Development of Centralized Authority. In Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, edited by Brumfiel, E. M. and Fox, J.W. pp. 31^13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spielmann, K. A. 1994 Clustered Confederacies: Sociopolitical Organization in the Protohistoric Rio Grande. In The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, edited by Wills, W. H. and Leonard, R.D. pp. 25^14. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Spielmann, K. A. (editor) 1991 Farmers, Hunters, and Colonists: Interaction between the Southwest and the Southern Plains. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Stark, M. T. 1992 From Sibling to Suki: Social Relations and Spatial Proximity in Kalinga Pottery Exchange. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 11: 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, S. 1982 Politics and Power: An Economic and Political History of the Western Pueblo. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Upham, S., Lightfoot, K. G., and Jewett, R. A. (editors) 1989 The Sociopolitical Structure of Prehistoric Southwestern Societies. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Wailes, B. 1995 A Case Study of Heterarchy in Complex Societies: Early Medieval Ireland and Its Archaeological Implications. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 55–70. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
White, J. C. 1995 Incorporating Heterarchy into Theory on Sociopolitical Development: The Case for Southeast Asia. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 71–86. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association Number, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. R. 1991 Changing Contexts of Pueblo Adaptations, A.D. 1250-1600. In Farmers, Hunters, and Colonists: Prehistoric and Historic Plains-Pueblo Exchange, edited by Spielmann, K. A., pp. 128–154. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N. 1993 Too Many Chiefs? or Safe Texts for the 90s. In Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, edited by Sherratt, A. and Yoffee, N., pp. 60–74. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zagarell, A. 1995 Hierarchy and Heterarchy: The Unity of Opposites. In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E., pp. 87–100. Archeological Papers No. 6. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar