Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:01:00.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gordon Creek Woman Meets Spirit Cave Man: A Response to Comment by Owsley and Jantz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alan Swedlund  and
Duane Anderson
Alan Swedlund
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, and Research Associate, Museum of Indian Arts and Culture, PO Box 2087, Santa Fe, NM 87504
Duane Anderson
Affiliation:
Museum of Indian Arts and Culture, PO Box 2087, Santa Fe, NM 87504
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Owsley and Jantz (2001) allege that we (Swedlund and Anderson 1999) misunderstand and misrepresent the events surrounding the controversy over Kennewick Man, and that we misconstrue statements they have made regarding Spirit Cave Man. They then move to their own analysis of Gordon Creek Woman to demonstrate the value of their morphometric techniques in addressing questions of biological affinity. In this reply we clarify and amplify our position on the key issues on which they challenge us, and we evaluate their morphometric analysis of Gordon Creek Woman. To our previous call for bioarchaeologists to more explicitly acknowledge the political environment in which questions of biological affinity currently arise, we add our concern that the methodologies used have their own set of problems and limitations.

Résumé

Résumé

Owsley y Jantz (2001a) alegan que nosotros (Swedlund y Anderson 1999) no entendemos ni representamos los sucesos alrededor de la controversia sobre el Kennewick Man. También, alegan que no interpretamos bien sus declaraciones con respecto a Spirit Cave Man. Después, ellos llevaron a cabo un análisis de Gordon Creek Woman para demostrar el mérito de sus técnicas morfomé tricas en relación a preguntas de afinidad biológica. En esta respuesta aclaramos y ampliamos nuesta posiciòn con respecto a los temas importantes en que ellos nos desafían, y evaluamos su análisis morfométrico de Gordon Creek Woman. A nuestra llamada previa en el sentido de que los bioarqueólogos reconozcan mas explícitamente el ambiente político en que las preguntas de afinidad biológica provienen, añadimos nuestra preocupación de que los métodos utilizados tienen sus propios problemas y limitaciones.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, D., Swedlund, A. C., and Bretemitz, D. A. 1997 Let's Avoid PaleoRacial Anthropology. Anthropology Newsletter 38(9):13-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F. 1912 Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants. American Anthropologist 14:530-563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breternitz, D. A., Swedlund, A. C., and Anderson, D. 1971 An Early Burial from Gordon Creek, Colorado. American Antiquity 36:170-182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatters, J. C. 2000 The Recovery and First Analysis of an Early Holocene Human Skeleton from Kennewick, Washington. American Antiquity 65:291-316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, R. M. 1990 Modern European Cranial Variables and Blood Polymorphisms Show Comparable Spatial Patterns. Human Biology 62:733-745.Google ScholarPubMed
Howells, W. W. 1973 Cranial Variation in Man. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 67. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. 1989 Skull Shapes and the Map. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 79. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jantz, R. L., and Owsley, D. W. 1997 Pathology, Taphonomy and Cranial Morphometries of the Spirit Cave Mummy. Nevada Historical Society Quarterly 40:62-84.Google Scholar
Jantz, R. L., and Owsley, D. W. 2001 Variation among Early North American Crania. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 114:146-155.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, C. S. 1997 Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardia, K. V. 1970 Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika 57:519-530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morell, V. 1998 Kennewick Man's Contemporaries. Science 280:191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ousley, S. D., and Jantz, R. L. 1998 The Forensic Data Bank: Documenting Skeletal Trends in the United States. In Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains, edited by Reichs, K. J., pp. 441-58. 2nd ed. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
Owsley, D. W. and Jantz, R. L. 2001 Archaeological Politics and Public Interest in Paleoamerican Studies: Lessons from Gordon Creek Woman and Kennewick Man. American Antiquity 66:565-575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J. E, and Neves, W. A. 1999 Craniofacial Morphology of the First Americans: Pattern and Process in the Peopling of the New World. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 42:153-188.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. F., and Rose, J. C. 1999 Report on the Osteological Assessment of the “Kennewick Man” Skeleton (CENWW97.Kennewick). In Report on the Nondestructive Examination, Description, and Analysis of the Human Remains from Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington [Oct. 1999]. National Park Service, http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/kennewick/.Google Scholar
Relethford, J. H. 1994 Craniometric Variation among Modern Human Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 95:53-62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, N.H.J. 1980 Marginal Skewness and Kurtosis in Testing Multivariate Normality. Applied Statistics 29:85-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, D. G., and Powell, J. F. 1994 Paleobiological Evidence of the Peopling of the Americas : A Morphometric View. In Method and Theory for Investigating the Peopling of the Americas, edited by Bonnichsen, R. and Steele, D. G., pp. 141-163. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A. C, and Anderson, D. 1999 Gordon Creek Woman Meets Kennewick Man: New Interpretations and Protocols Regarding the Peopling of the Americas. American Antiquity 64:569-576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Vark, G. N., and W., Schaafsma 1992 Advances in the Quantitative Analysis of Skeletal Morphology. In Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods, edited by Saunders, S. and Katzenberg, A., pp. 225-257. Wiley-Liss, New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. R. 1981 Comparing Fossil Specimens with Population Samples. Journal of Human Evolution 10:207-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar