Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:21:31.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluoride Dating of Faunal Materials by Ion-Selective Electrode: High Resolution Relative Dating at an Early Agricultural Period Site in the Tucson Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark R. Schurr  and
David A. Gregory
Mark R. Schurr
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
David A. Gregory
Affiliation:
Desert Archaeology, Inc., 3975 N. Tucson Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85716
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When the fluoride content of bone is measured with an ion-selective electrode, and when the technique is correctly applied, fluoride dating is a very economical method for developing fine-scale relative chronologies. It has been successfully used to develop relative chronologies for prehistoric human burials and fossilized bones throughout the world, but its much greater potential for the dating of unfossilized faunal materials has been neglected. The fluoride contents of 889 lagomorph and 16 artiodactyl bones from 183 contexts at Los Pozos, an Early Agricultural period site in Arizona, illustrate how fluoride measurements can be used to date features. Fluoride dating offers a temporal resolution capable of distinguishing between features separated by as little as 20 to 40 years.

Résumé

Résumé

Cuando el contenido de fluoruro de hueso se mide con un electrodo de selectión iónica, y cuando la técnica se aplica correctamente, el fechamiento a base de fluoruro es un método muy económico para desarrollar cronologías relativas a escala fina. A pesar de que este método ha sido utilizado exitosamente a nivel mundial para la determinatión de cronologías relativas de entierros humanos prehistóricos y huesos fosilizados, el gran potential que ofrece para el fechamiento de restos de fauna no-fosilizados ha sido ignorado. Aquí presentamos el contenido de fluoruro de 889 huesos de lagomorph y de 16 huesos de artiodactyl procedentes de 183 localidades en el sitio de Los Pozos del período "Early Agricultural" en Arizona, E. U.A., como ejemplo de su uso en la datatión de elementos arqueológicos. El fechamiento a base de fluoruro tiene una alta resolutión, siendo posible detectar diferencias temporales entre elementos arqueológicos depositados con una diferencia mínima de entre 20 ó 40 años.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 281 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Callaghan, R. T. 1986 Analysis of the Fluoride Content of Human Remains from the Gray Site, Saskatchewan. Plains Anthropologist 31:317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. F. 1960 Dating Prehistoric Bone by Chemical Analysis. In Applications of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, edited by Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., pp. 223–245. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. 1996a Archaeological Investigations of the Early Agricultural Period Settlement at the Base of A-Mountain, Tucson, Arizona. Technical Report No. 96-21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Buffalo News 1996b Further A rchaeological Investigations of the Rio Nuevo South Property, City of Tucson, Arizona. Technical Report No. 96-5. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Diehl, M. 2001 Macrobotanical Remains and Land Use: Subsistence and Strategies for Food Acquisition. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 195–208. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Eighmy, J. L., and LaBelle, J. M. 1996 Radiocarbon Dating of Twenty-Seven Plains Complexes and Phases. Plains Anthropologist 41:53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzo, J. A. 1992 A Refinement of the Adult Burial Chronology of Grasshopper Pueblo. Journal of Archaeological Science 19:445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzo, J. A., and Deaver, W. L. 1998 Watering the Desert: Data Recovery at the Costello-King Site (AZAA:12:503[ASM]), a Late Archaic Site in the Northern Tucson Basin. Technical Series No. 68. Statistical Research, Tucson.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. K. L. (editor) 1998 Archaeological Investigations at the Wetlands Site, AZ AA: 12:90 (ASM). Technical Report No. 97-5. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 1984 Excavations at the Siphon Draw Site. In Hohokam Archaeology along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct, Central Arizona Project: Vol. 4. Village Sites on Queen Creek and Siphon Draw, edited by Teague, L. S. and Crown, P. L., pp. 17–218. Archaeological Series No. 150. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 1995 Interstate 10 Frontage Road Project, Ruthrauff Road to Prince Road: Results of Archaeological Testing and a Plan for Data Recovery at AZAA: 12:91 (ASM). Technical Report 95-8. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 1996 New Issues in the Interpretation of Archaic Period Radiocarbon Dates. Paper presented at the Conference on the Archaic Prehistory of the North American Southwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Buffalo News 2001a An Evaluation of Early Agricultural Period Chronology in the Tucson Basin. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Period Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 237–253. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Buffalo News 2001b Architectural Features and their Characteristics. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Period Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 29–69. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Buffalo News 2001c A Reconsideration of Chronology, Architectural Variability, and Site Structure at Santa Cruz Bend and Stone Pipe. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Period Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 337–350. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Buffalo News 2001d Extramural Features. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Period Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 71–90. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 2001e Variation and Trend During the Early Agricultural Period. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Period Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 255–279. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. (editor) 2001 Excavations in the Santa Cruz. Floodplain: The Early Agricultural Component at Los Pozos. Anthropological Papers No. 21. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., and Baar, S. W. IV 1999 Stratigraphy, Chronology, and Characteristics of the Natural and Cultural Deposits. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz Floodplain: The Middle Archaic Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 13–32. Anthropological Papers No. 20. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., and Diehl, M. 2000 Duration, Continuity, and Intensity of Occupation at a Late Cienega Phase Settlement in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain. Paper presented at the Southwest Symposium, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., and Huckell, B. B. 1999 Small, Round, and Stable: Early Agricultural Period Pithouse Architecture and Its Implications for the Rise of Long-Term Settlements in Southeastern Arizona. Paper prepared for the Working Group: Pit Structures and Prehistoric Southwestemers, 63rd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., and Mabry, J. B. 1998 Revised Research Design for the Archaeological Treatment Plan, Interstate 10 Corridor Improvement Project, Tangerine Road to the Interstate 19 Interchange. Technical Report No. 97-19. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., Doelle, W. H., and Castalia, P. 1998 Results of a Testing Program and a Plan for Archaeological Data Recovery at Three Sites in the Ruthrauff Road to Prince Road Segment, Interstate 10 Corridor Improvement Project. Technical Report No. 98-1. Desert Archaeology, Inc., Tucson.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A., Freeman, A. K. L., and Huckleberry, G. A. 1999 Composite Stratigraphic Cross Sections. In Excavations in the Santa Cruz River Floodplain: The Middle Archaic Component at Los Pozos, edited by Gregory, D. A., pp. 125–142. Anthropological Papers No. 20. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Haddy, A., and Hanson, A. 1982 Nitrogen and Fluorine Dating of Moundville Skeletal Samples. Archaeometry 24:37–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, T. K. 1987 Structure and Organization at La Ciudad. Anthropological Field Studies No. 18. Office of Cultural Resource Management, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Howard, J. B. 1985 Courtyard Groups and Domestic Cycling: A Hypothetical Model of Growth. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, edited by Dittert, A. E. Jr., and Dove, D. E., pp. 311–326. Occasional Paper No. 2. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Huckell, B. B. 1995 Of Marshes and Maize: Preceramic Agricultural Settlements in the Cienega Valley, Southeastern Arizona. Anthropological Papers No. 59. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckell, B. B. 1996 The Archaic Prehistory of the North American Southwest. Journal of World Prehistory 10:305–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckell, B. B., Huckell, L. W., and Fish, S. K. 1995 Investigations at Milagro, a Late Preceramic Site in the Eastern Tucson Basin. Technical Report No. 94-5. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Huntington, F. W. 1988 Rincon Phase Community Organization. In Recent Research in Tucson Basin Prehistory: Proceedings of the Second Tucson Basin Conference, edited by Doelle, W. H. and Fish, P. R., pp. 207–224. Anthropological Papers No. 10. Institute for American Research, Tucson.Google Scholar
Johnsson, K. 1997 Chemical Dating of Bones Based on Diagenetic Changes in Bone Apatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:431–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kshirsagar, A. 1993 The Role of Fluorine in the Chronometric Dating of Indian Stone Age Cultures. Man and Environment 18(2):23–32.Google Scholar
Mabry, J. B. (editor) 1998 Archaeological Investigations of Early Village Sites in the Middle Santa Cruz Valley: Analyses and Syntheses. Anthropological Papers No. 19. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Mabry, J. B., Swartz, D. L., Wocherl, H., Clark, J. J., Archer, G. H., and Lindeman, M. W. 1997 Archaeological Investigations of Early Village Sites in the Middle Santa Cruz Valley: Descriptions of the Santa Cruz Bend, Square Hearth, Stone Pipe, and Canal Sites. Anthropological Papers No. 18. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Matsu’ura, S. 1981 Determination of Fluoride in Fossil Bone with an Ion-Selective Electrode. Bulletin of the National Museum of Science, Tokyo, Series D 7:7–16.Google Scholar
Matsu’ura, S. 1984 Fluorine Dating of a Human Talus from Hijiridake Cave. Bulletin of the National Museum of Science, Tokyo, Series D 10:1–7.Google Scholar
Matsu’ura, S., Watanabe, N., Aziz, F., Shibasaki, T., and Kondo, M. 1990 Preliminary Dating of a Hominid Fossil Tibia from Sambungmacan by Fluorine Analysis. Bulletin of the National Museum of Science, Tokyo, Series D 16:19–29.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, P. T. 1992 Burned Archaeological Bone. In Deciphering a Shell Midden, edited by Stein, J. K., pp. 347–368. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Meyers, L. S., and Grossen, N. E. 1974 Behavioral Research: Theory, Procedure, and Design. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Middleton, J. 1844 On Fluorine in Bones, Its Source, and Its Application to the Determination of the Geological Age of Fossil Bones. Proceedings of the Geological Society (London) 4:431–433.Google Scholar
Muro, M. 1998 Not Just Another Roadside Attraction. American Archaeology 2(4): 10–16.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1951 The Fluorine-Dating Method. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 5:44–52.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P., and Hoskins, C. R. 1950 New Evidence on the Antiquity of Piltdown Man. Nature 165:379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. B., Murphy, J. W., and Toots, H. 1974 Fluorine in Fossilized Bone and Tooth: Distribution among Skeletal Tissues. Archaeometry 16:98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. B., and Toots, H. 1980 Trace Elements in Bones as Paleobiological Indicators. In Fossils in the Making, edited by Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Hill, A. P., pp. 197–207. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schurr, M. R. 1989 Fluoride Dating of Prehistoric Bones by Ion Selective Electrode. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schurr, M. R. 1998 Fluoride Dating of Faunal Materials: A Neglected Tool. Poster paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle.Google Scholar
Singer, L., and Armstrong, D. W. 1965 Determination of Fluoride in Bone with the Fluoride Electrode. Analytical Chemistry 40:613–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sires, E. W. Jr., 1985 Hohokam Architectural Variability and Site Structure During the Sedentary-Classic Transition. In The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, edited by Doyel, D. E., pp. 171–182. Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, Colorado.Google Scholar
Spence, M. W., Wall, S. G., and King, R. H. 1981 Fluorine Dating in an Ontario Burial Site. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 5:61–77.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C Database and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35:215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankersley, K. B. 1999 Sheridan: A Stratified Pleistocene-Holocene Cave Site in the Great Lakes Region of North America. BAR International Series 800:67–75.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K. B., Schlecht, K. D., and Laub, R. S. 1998 Fluoride Dating of Mastodon Bone from an Early Paleoindian Spring. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J. S., Oakley, K. P., and Le Gros Clark, W E. 1950 The Solution of the Piltdown Problem. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Geology 2:139–146.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. R., McGuire, T. R., and Sternberg, C. 1981 Snaketown Revisited. Archaeological Series No. 155. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar