Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:22:04.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas B. Bamforth
Douglas B. Bamforth*
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, CB 233, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0233
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary theory and terminology are widely used in recent archaeological work, and many evolutionary archaeologists have argued that the integration of such theory and terminology is essential to the future of our field. This paper considers evolutionary archaeology from two perspectives. First, it examines substantive claims that archaeology can study the operation of Darwinian evolution, either through a reliance on optimal-foraging theory or by linking the process of natural selection to archaeological data. It concludes that there are serious problems with both of these claims on Darwin: the relation between evolution and foraging theory has never been documented, and midrange arguments linking selection and archaeological data are unsustainable. Second, it argues that archaeologists rely metaphorically on evolutionary terminology to help make sense out of archaeological data. Although the use of evolutionary metaphor can be, and has been, problematic, it also offers a powerful conceptual framework for our research. However, this framework is only of one of a number of comparable frameworks that have been offered to our field, as a comparison of systems archaeology and evolutionary archaeology shows.

Résumé

Résumé

La teoría y terminología evolucionarias son usadas ampliamente en el trabajo arqueólogico reciente, y muchos arqueólogos evolucionarios han argumentado que la integración de dicha teoría y terminología es esencial para el futuro de nuestro campo. Este escrito considera la arqueología evolucionaria desde dos perspectivas. Primero, examina pretensiones substantivas de que la arqueología puede estudiar el funcionamiento de la evolución Darwiniana, ya sea a través de la confianza en la teoria del abastecimiento óptimo o enlazando el proceso de la selección natural a los datos arqueológicos. Concluye que hay serios prolemas con estos dos alegatos sobre Darwin: la relación entre evolución y la teoría del abastecimiento nunca ha sido documentada, y los argumentos de mediano alcance enlazando la selección y los datos arquelógicos son insostenibles. Segundo, a pesar to eso, también los arqueólogos metafóricante confían en la terminologia evolucionaria para mejorar la comprensión de los datos arqueológicos. Aunque el uso de la metáfora evolucionaria puede ser, y ha sido, problemático, igualmente ofrece un marco conceptual poderosos para nuestra investigación. Sin embargo, este armazón ideológico es sólo una de varias estructuras de pensamiento comparables que han sido ofrecidas a nuestro campo, conforme un cotejo entre la arqueología de sistemas y la arqueología evolucionaria nos muestra.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 435 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bamforth, D. 1988 Ecology and Human Organization on the Great Plains. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, D. 2001 Radiocarbon Calibration, Tree-Rings, Climate, and the Course of War in the Middle Missouri. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans. Google Scholar
Bamforth, D., and Bleed, P. 1997 Technology, Flaked Stone Technology, and Risk. In Rediscovering Darwin, edited by Barton, C. and Clark, G., pp. 109–140. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 7. Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. 1977 Conformity to Ethos and Reproductive Success in Two Hausa Communities: An Empirical Evaluation. Ethos 5:409–425.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D., and Bleed, P. 1989 Darwin, Sex, and Status. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Bettinger, R. 1991 Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Betzig, N. 1986 Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dog's Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4–20.Google Scholar
Boone, J., and Smith, E. 1998 Is It Evolution Yet?: A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 39:141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, J. 1994 Declines in Mammalian Foraging Efficiency During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13:371–401.Google Scholar
Broughton, J., and O’Connell, J. 1999 On Evolutionary Ecology, Selectionist Archaeology, and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity 64:153–165.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, L. 2001 Shaping Science with Rhetoric. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. 1979 Is Reproductive Success Equal in Egalitarian Societies? In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, edited by Chagnon, N. and Irons, W., pp. 374–401. Duxbury Press, N. Scituate, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. 1988 Life Histories, Blood Revenge, and Warfare in a Tribal Society. Science 239:985–992.Google Scholar
Childe,, V. G. 1951 Man Makes Himself. Mentor Books, New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. 1981 Evolutionary Epistemology and Values. Current Anthropology 22:201–218.Google Scholar
Cronk, L. 1989a From Hunters to Herders: Subsistence Change as a Reproductive Strategy Among the Mukogodo. Current Anthropology 30:224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, L. 1989b Low Socio-Economic Status and Female-Biased Parental Investment: The Mukogodo Example. American Anthropologist 91:414–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, L., Chagnon, N., and Irons, W. 2000 Adaptation and Human Behavior. Aldine De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1982 The Extended Phenotype. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Dean, J. 1996 Demography, Environment, and Subsistence Stress. In Evolving Complexity and Environmental Risk in the Prehistoric Southwest, edited by Tainter, J. and Tainter, B., pp. 25–56. Addison-Wesley, New York.Google Scholar
Delany, S. 1977 The Fall of the Towers. Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1937 Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dover, G. 2000 Anti-Dawkins. In Alas Poor Darwin, edited by Rose, H. and Rose, S., pp. 55–77. Harmony Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. 1978 Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy. American Antiquity 43:192–202.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. 1980 Evolutionary Theory and Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3:35–99.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P., and Minnegal, M. 1993 Are Kubo Hunters ‘Show Offs’? Ethology and Sociobiology 14:53–70.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. 1968 Archaeological Systems Theory and Early Mesoamerica. In Anthropological Archaeology in the Americas, edited by Meggars, B., pp. 67–87. Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Flannery, K. 1973 Archaeology With a Capital S. In Research and Theory in Current Archaeology, edited by Redman, C., pp. 47–53. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. 1997 Culture and Evolution of Social Learning. Evolution and Human Behavior 18:23– 67.Google Scholar
Glassow, M., and Wilcoxen, L. 1988 Coastal Adaptations Near Point Conception, California, With Particular Regard to Shellfish Exploitation. American Antiquity 53:36–51.Google Scholar
Goodnight, C, and Stevens, L. 1997 Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell Us about Group Selection in Nature? American Naturalist 150, Supplement: S59–S79.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 2000 More Things in Heaven and Earth. In Alas Poor Darwin, edited by Rose, H. and Rose, S., pp. 101–126. Harmony Books, New York.Google Scholar
Gowlett, J. 1997 Why the Muddle in the Middle Matters: The Language of Comparative and Direct in Human Evolution. In Rediscovering Darwin, edited by Barton, C. and Clark, G., pp. 49–66. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 7. Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 1984 Natural Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection. In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by Krebs, J. and Davies, N., pp. 62–84. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Gumerman, G., and Phillips, D. 1978 Archaeology Beyond Anthropology. American Antiquity 43:184–192.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K. 1991 Showing Off: Tests of an Hypothesis about Men's Foraging Goals. Ethology and Sociobiology 12:29–54.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., Hill, K., and ‘O’Connell, J 1982 Why Hunters Gather: Optimal Foraging and the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. American Ethnologist 9:379–398.Google Scholar
Hill, J. 1984 Prestige and Reproductive Success in Man. Ethology and Sociobiology 5:77–95.Google Scholar
Hill, K. 1988 Macronutrient Modifications of Optimal Foraging Theory: An Approach Using Indifference Curves Applied to Some Modern Foragers. Human Ecology 16:157–197.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Hawkes, K. 1983 Neotropical Hunting Among the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. edited by Hames, R. and Vickers, W., pp. 139–188. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Hurtado, M. 1996 Ache Life History. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Hurtado, M. 1988a Tradeoffs in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies Among the Ache: Part 1. In Human Reproductive Behavior, edited by Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. , and Turke, P., pp. 277–289. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. 1988b Tradeoffs in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies Among the Ache: Part 2. In Human Reproductive Behavior, edited by Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. , and Turke, P., pp. 291–305. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, K., Hawkes, K., Hurtado, A., and Kaplan, H. 1984 Seasonal Variance in the Diet of Ache Hunter-Gatherers in Eastern Paraguay. Human Ecology 12:145–180.Google Scholar
Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hawkes, K., and Hurtado, A. 1987 Foraging Decisions Among Ache Hunter-Gatherers: New Data and Implications for Optimal Foraging Models. Ethology and Sociobiology 8:1–36.Google Scholar
Hurt, T., Rakita, G., and Leonard, R. 2001 Models, Definitions, and Stylistic Variation: Comment on Ortmann. American Antiquity 66:742–743.Google Scholar
Irons, W. 1979 Cultural and Biological Success. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, edited by Chagnon, N. and Irons, W., pp. 257–272. Duxbury Press, N. Scituate, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Jochim, M. 1976 Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence and Settlement: A Predictive Model. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jochim, M. 1998 A Hunter-Gatherer Landscape. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jones, G., Leonard, R., and Abbott, A. 1995 The Structure of Selectionist Explanations in Archaeology. In Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, edited by Teltser, P., pp. 13–32. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1999 Almost Like A Whale: The Origin of Species Updated. Bantam Books, London.Google Scholar
Kacelnik, A., and Krebs, J. 1997 Yanomamo Dreams and Starling Payloads: The Logic of Optimality. In Human Nature, edited by Betzig, L., pp. 21–35. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. 1985a Hunting Ability and Reproductive Success Among Male Ache Foragers: Preliminary Results. Current Anthropology 26:131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. 1985b Food Sharing Among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses. Current Anthropology 26:223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. 1992 The Evolutionary Ecology of Food Acquisition. In Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, edited by Smith, E. and Winterhalder, B., pp. 167–201. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Hawkes, K., and Hurtado, A. 1984 Food Sharing Among the Ache Hunter-Gatherers of Eastern Paraguay. Current Anthropology 25:113–115.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. 1995 The Foraging Spectrum. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kimura, M. 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Klein, R. 1995 Anatomy, Behavior, and Modern Human Origins. Journal of World Prehistory 9:167–197.Google Scholar
Krebs, J., and Davies, N. 1997 Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. 4th ed.. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, T., and Graves, M. 2000 Evolutionary Theory and the Historical Development of Dry-Land Agriculture in North Kohala, Hawai’i. American Antiquity 65:423–148.Google Scholar
Larson, D., Neff, H., Graybill, D., Michaelson, J, and Ambos, E. 1996 Risk, Climatic Variability, and the Study of Southwestern Prehistory: An Evolutionary Perspective. American Antiquity 61:217–242.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. and Reed, H. 1993 Population Aggregation in the Prehistoric American Southwest: A Selectionist Model. American Antiquity 58:648–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, M. 1972 Issues in Anthropological Archaeology. In Contemporary Archaeology, edited by Leone, M., pp. 14–27. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. 1979 Fitness, Survival, and Optimality. In Analysis of Ecological Systems, edited by Horn, D., Mitchell, R., and Stairs, G., pp. 3–21. Ohio University Press, Columbus.Google Scholar
Lipo, C, Madsen, M., Dunnell, R., and Hunt, T. 1997 Population Structure, Cultural Transmission, and Frequency Seriation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16:301–333.Google Scholar
Lyman, R., and O’Brien, M.| 1998 The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 39:615–652.Google Scholar
Maasen, S., Mendelsohn, E., and Weingart, P. 1995 Metaphors: Is There a Bridge Over Troubled Waters. In Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, edited by Maasen, S., Mendelsohn, E., and Weingart, P., pp. 1–10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
Majerus, M. 1998 Melanism: Evolution in Action. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
McBrearty, S. 1999 Society of Africanist Archaeologists. Evolutionary Anthropology 8:1–3.Google Scholar
Merrell, D. 1994 The Adaptive Seascape: The Mechanism of Evolution. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 1990 Thoughtful Foragers. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 1996 The Prehistory of the Mind. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1992 Ceramics and Evolution. Archaeological Method and Theory 4:141–193. Google Scholar
Neff, H. 2000 On Evolutionary Ecology and Evolutionary Archaeology: Some Common Ground? Current Anthropology 41:427–429.Google Scholar
Niemann, F. 1995 Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages. American Antiquity 60:7–36.Google Scholar
Niemann, F. 1999 Discussion on the Limits of Evolutionary Archaeology. Paper Presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Chicago.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M., and Holland, X 1990 Variation, Selection, and the Archaeological Record. Archaeological Method and Theory 2:31–79.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M., and Holland, X 1992 The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation. American Antiquity 57:36–59.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J., Jones, K., and Simms, S. 1982 Some Thoughts on Prehistoric Archaeology in the Great Basin. In Man and Environment in the Great Basin, edited by Madsen, D. and O’Connell, J. , pp. 227–240. Society for American Archaeology Papers No. 2. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Perusse, D. 1993 Cultural and Reproductive Success in Industrial Societies: Testing the Hypothesis at the Proximate and Ultimate Levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:267–322.Google Scholar
Redman, C. 1978 The Rise of Civilization. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Rindos, D. 1985 Darwinian Selection, Symbolic Variation, and the Evolution of Culture. Current Anthropology 26:65–88.Google Scholar
Rose, H., and Rose, S. 2000 Alas Poor Darwin. Harmony Books, New York.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. 1978 What Can Systems Theory Do for Archaeology? American Antiquity 43:174–183.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., and Wilkinson, J. 2001 Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 66:577–594.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A. 1991 Inujjuamiut Foraging Strategies: Evolutionary Ecology of an Arctic Hunting Economy. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A. 2000 Three Styles in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behavior. In Adaptation and Human Behavior, edited by Cronk, L., Chagnon, N., and Irons, W., pp. 27–47 . Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., and Winterhalder, B. 1992 Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Sober, E., and Wilson, D. 1998 Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Soltis, J., Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. 1995 Can Group-Functional Behaviors Evolve by Cultural Group Selection? Current Anthropology 36:473–494.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 1948 A Study of Archaeology. American Anthropological Association Memoir 69. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1989 Time, Energy, and Stone Tools. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, P., LeBlanc, S., and Redman, C. 1972 Explanation in Archaeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wills, W., Crown, P., Dean, J., and Layton, C. 1994 Complex Adaptive Systems and Southwestern Prehistory. In Understanding Complexity in the Prehistoric Southwest, edited by Gumerman, G. and Gell Mann, M., pp. 297–340. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, Proceedings XVI. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E. 1973 Interaction, Spacing Behavior, and the Organization of Hunting Bands. Journal of Anthropological Research 29:1–31.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1998 Hunting, Sharing, and Multilevel Selection. Current Anthropology 39:73–97.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, B. 1997 Gifts Given, Gifts Taken: The Behavioral Ecology of Nonmarket Intergroup Exchange. Journal of Archaeological Research 5:121–168.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, B., and Smith, E. 1980 Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wood, B., and Hill, K. 2000 A Test of the “Showing-Off’ Hypothesis with Ache Hunters. Current Anthropology 41:124–125.Google Scholar