Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:43:38.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

End Scraper Reduction and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brooke S. Blades
Brooke S. Blades*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various lithic measures have been invoked to argue that human foragers moved over greater or lesser distances, or moved with greater or lesser frequency when compared with other foraging groups. This paper examines one of those measures—the reduction of blade end scrapers from early Upper Paleolithic Aurignacian and Perigordian occupations in southwestern France. Evidence of end scraper reduction is compared with faunal diversity and lithic material provenience, the former a potential catalyst of and the latter a potential reflection of mobility. A relationship between less-intense end scraper reduction, somewhat elevated percentages of distant raw materials, and reindeer-dominated fauna is noted during cold and apparently open environmental conditions. Less consistency in the extent of end scraper reduction is observed among assemblages associated with more diverse and at times less-mobile fauna. These observations argue for the importance of a fine-grained comparison of lithic and other data, the complexity of procurement strategies, and the recognition that greater or lesser reduction does not translate directly into greater or lesser mobility.

Résumé

Résumé

Varias medidas líticas han sido invocadas al discutir que los recolectores humanos se movieron sobre distancias mayores o menores, o se movieron con más o menos frecuencia en comparación con otros grupos similares. Este ensayo examina una de esas medidas—la reducción de los filos en los raspadores de las ocupaciones del Paleolítico Superior en el sureste de Francia-. Se compara la evidencia de la reducción en los filos del raspador con la diversidad de fauna y la proveniencia del material; el primero, un catalizador potential y el segundo, una reflexión potential de movilidad. Se nota la relation entre la reducción de los filos de los raspadores, porcentajes elevados de materias primas distantes, y fauna dominada por los renos durante condiciones ambientales frías y, según parece, abiertas. Se observa menos consistencia en el grado de la reducción de filos de los raspadores entre ensamblajes asociados con fauna más diversa y a veces mas móvil. Estas observaciones argumentan a favor de la importancia de una comparación fina entre datos líticos y otros datos; la complejidad de estrategias de obtención, y el reconocimiento de que más o menos reducción del filo no implica directamente mayor o menor movilidad.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 141 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bamforth, D. 1986 Technological Efficiency and Tool Curation. American Antiquity 51:38-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1991 Population Dispersion and Paleoindian Technology at the Allen Site. In Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, edited by Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., pp. 357-397. University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology No. 19, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Bettinger, R. 1991 Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, R., and Baumhoff, M. 1982 The Numic Spread: Great Basin Cultures in Competition. American Antiquity 47:485-503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1977 Forty-Seven Trips: A Case Study in the Character of Archaeological Formation Processes. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution, and Complexity, edited by Wright, R. V. S., pp. 24-46. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 25:255-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blades, B. 1999 Aurignacian Lithic Economy and Early Modern Human Mobility: New Perspectives from Classic Sites in the Vézère Valley of France. Journal of Human Evolution 37:91-120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleed, P. 1986 The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons: Maintainability or Reliability. American Antiquity 51:737-747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondon, N. 1980 L’Etude de l’Industrie LithiqueAurignacienne (Couche 14) de l’abri Pataud (Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne). Memoire de DEA, Musée d’Histoire Naturelle, Institut de Paleontologie Humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Bouchud, J. 1975 Etude de la Faune de l’abri Pataud. In Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne), edited by Movius, H. L. Jr., pp. 69-153. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin No. 30. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bricker, H. M. 1973 The Perigordian IV and Related Cultures in France. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge. Google Scholar
Bricker, H. M. 1995 Le Perigordien moyen de l’abri Pataud niveau 5. In Le Paleolithique superieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): Les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr., edited by Bricker, H. M., pp. 133-165. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, H. M., and David, N. 1984 The P6rigordian VI (Level 3) Assemblage. In Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne), edited by Movius, H. L. Jr. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. 1979 The Significance of Variability in Paleolithic Assemblages: An Aurignacian Example from Southwestern France. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. 1982 Aurignacian Assemblages from Abri Pataud (Dordogne, France). In Aurignacien et Pirigordien en Europe, pp. 92-104. ERAUL No. 13-2. University de Liege, Liege.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. 1995 L’Aurignacien de l’abri Pataud niveaux 6 a 14. In Le Paleolithique superieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr., edited by Bricker, H. M., pp. 167-222. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de rHomme, Paris.Google Scholar
Can, P. 1994 Technological Organization and Prehistoric Hunter- Gatherer Mobility: Examination of the Hayes Site. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, edited by Carr, P., pp. 35-14. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. 1992 Spatial Organization and Habitat Use. In Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, edited by Smith, E. and Winterhalder, B., pp. 237-266. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Delpech, F. 1984 La Ferrassie: Carnivores, Artiodactyles et Perissodactyles. In Le grand abri de la Ferrassie: fouilles 1968-1973, edited by Delporte, H., pp. 61-89. Etudes Quaternaires 7, Universite de Provence. Institut de Paleontologie Humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. 1987 Reduction Sequences in the Manufacture of Mousterian Implements of France. In The Pleistocene Old World, edited by Soffer, O., pp. 33-6. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H. 1995 Middle Paleolithic Scraper Reduction: Background, Clarification, and Review of the Evidence to Date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2:299-368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H. 1997 Platform Variability and Flake Morphology: A Comparison of Experimental and Archaeological Data and Implications for Interpreting Prehistoric Lithic Technological Strategies. Lithic Technology 22:150-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H., and Whittaker, J. 1981 New Experimental Evidence on the Relation between Percussion Flaking and Flake Variation. Journal of Archaeological Science 6:283-296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrand, W. 1975 Analysis of the Abri Pataud Sediments. In Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne), edited by Movius, H. L. Jr., pp. 27-68. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin No. 30. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrand, W. 1995 Etude sedimentologique du remplissage de l’abri Pataud. In Le Paleolithique superieur de I ‘abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr., edited by Bricker, H. M., pp. 31-65. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Feblot-Augustins, J. 1999 La mobilite des groupes paleolithiques. Bulletin et Memoire de la Societe d’Anthropologic de Paris n.s. 11:219-260.Google Scholar
Geneste, J.-M. 1985 Analyse lithique d’industries mousteriennes du Perigord: une approach technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paleolithique moyen. These Sc., University de Bordeaux I. Google Scholar
Goodyear, A. 1989 An Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Materials Among Paleoindian Groups in North America. Reprinted in Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Ellis, C. and Lothrop, J., pp. 1-9. Westview Press, Boulder. Originally published 1979, Research Manuscript Series 156, University of South Carolina, Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Columbia.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 1984 Mosaics, Allelochemics, and Nutrients—An Ecological Theory of Late Pleistocene Megafaunal Extinctions. In Quaternary Extinctions — A Prehistoric Revolution, edited by Martin, P. and Klein, R., pp. 259-298. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hess, S. 1997 Rocks, Range, and Renfrew: Using Distance-Decay Effects to Study Late Pre-Mazama Period Obsidian Acquisition and Mobility in Oregon and Washington. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Holdaway, S. 1991 Resharpening Reduction and Lithic Assemblage Variability Across the Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. 1983 Hunter-Gatherer Mobility Strategies. Journal of Anthropological Research 39:277-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. 1992 Mobility/Sedentism: Concepts, Archaeological Measures, and Effects. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:43-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. 1995 The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. 1994 A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Mobile Toolkits. American Antiquity 59:426-442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. 1996 The Trouble with Ham Steaks: A Reply to Morrow. American Antiquity 61:591-595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laville, H., and Tuffreau, A. 1984 Les depots du grand abri de la Ferrassie: stratigraphie, signification climatique et chronologie. In Le grand abri de la Ferrassie: fouilles 1968-1973, edited by Delporte, H., pp. 25-50. Etudes Quaternaires 7, Universite” de Provence. Institut de Paleontologie Humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Laville, H., Rigaud, J.-P., and Sackett, J. 1980 Rock Shelters of the Perigord — Geological Stratigraphy and Archaeological Succession. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lurie, R. 1989 Lithic Technology and Mobility Strategies: The Koster Site Middle Archaic. In Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, edited by Torrence, R., pp. 46-56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marks, A. 1988 The Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition in the Southern Levant: Technological Change as an Adaptation to Increasing Mobility. In L’homme de Néandertal, tome 8: la mutation, edited by Kozłowski, J. K., pp. 109-123. ERAUL No. 35. Université de Liège, Liège. Google Scholar
Marks, A. 1993 The Early Upper Paleolithic: The View from the Levant. In Before Lascaux: The Complex Record of the Early Upper Paleolithic, edited by Knecht, H., Pike-Tay, A., and White, R., pp. 5-21. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. 1984 On Stone Procurement and Settlement Mobility in Eastern Fluted Point Groups. North American Archaeologist 6:1-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, D. 1989 Was Stone Exchanged Among Eastern North American Paleoindians? In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Ellis, C. and Lothrop, J., pp. 11-39. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Montet-White, A. 1980 Modele typometrique d’une industrie gravettienne d’Europe Centrale. In L’Aurignacien et le Gravettien (Perigordien) dans leur cadre ecologique, edited by Banesz, L. and Kozlowski, J. K., pp. 153-161. Institut Archeologique de l’Academie Slovaque des Sciences, Nitra.Google Scholar
Morrow, C. and Jeffries, R. 1989 Trade or Embedded Procurement?: A Test Case from Southern Illinois. In Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, edited by Torrence, R., pp. 27-33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morrow, J. 1997 End Scraper Morphology and Use-Life: An Approach for Studying Paleoindian Lithic Technology and Mobility. Lithic Technology 22:70-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, T. 1996 Bigger is Better: Comments on Kuhn's Formal Approach to Mobile Tool Kits. American Antiquity 61:581—590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movius, H. L. Jr., 1977 Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne). Stratigraphy. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin No. 31. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. Jr., David, N., Bricker, H. M., and Clay, R. B. 1968 The Analysis of Certain Major Classes of Upper Paleolithic Tools. American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin 26. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Munday, F. 1979 Levantine Mousterian Technological Variability: A Perspective from the Negev. Paleorient 5:87-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, S. 1996 Is Curation a Useful Heuristic? In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by Odell, G., pp. 81-100. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, G. 1996 Economizing Behavior and the Concept of “Curation.” In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by Odell, G., pp. 51-80. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, W. 1976 An Anthropological Analysis of Food-Getting Technology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Paquereau, M.-M. 1984 Etude palynologique du gisement de la Ferrassie (Dordogne). In Le grand abri de la Ferrassie: fouilles 1968-1973, edited by Delporte, H., pp. 51-59. Etudes Quatemaires 7, Universite de Provence. Institut de Paleontologie Humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Pike-Tay, A. 1991 Red Deer Hunting in the Upper Paleolithic of Southwest France: A Study in Seasonality. British Archaeological Reports International Series 569, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike-Tay, A., and Bricker, H. M. 1993 Hunting in the Gravettian: An Examination of Evidence from Southwestern France. In Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia, edited by Peterkin, G., Bricker, H. M., and Mellars, P., pp. 127-143. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Number 4, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Rolland, N., and Dibble, H. 1990 A New Synthesis of Middle Paleolithic Variability. American Antiquity 55:480-499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, M. 1986 Technological Organization and Settlement Mobility: An Ethnographic Examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42:15-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, M. 1989 Technological Organization in Great Lakes Paleoindian Assemblages. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Ellis, C. and Lothrop, J., pp. 221-237. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Shott, M. 1990 Stone Tools and Economics: Great Lakes Paleoindian Examples. In Early Paleo-Indian Economies of North America, edited by Isaac, B. and Tankersley, K., pp. 3-43. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, G. B. 1981 Hunter and Habitat in the Central Kalahari Desert. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spiess, A. 1979 Reindeer and Caribou Hunters: An Archaeological Study. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stiner, M., and Kuhn, S. 1992 Subsistence, Technology, and Adaptive Variation in Middle Paleolithic Italy. American Anthropologist 94:306-339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrence, R. 1983 Time Budgeting and Hunter-Gatherer Technology. In Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, edited by Bailey, G., pp. 11-22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E. 1970 Lithic Analysis and Cultural Inference: A Paleo-Indian Case. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona No. 16, Tucson.Google Scholar
Woodburn, J. 1970 Hunters and Gatherers: The Material Culture of the Nomadic Hadza. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Yellen, J. 1977 Archaeological Approaches to the Present: Models for Reconstructing the Past. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar