Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:41:21.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Temperature on Protein Decay in Bone: Its Significance in Nitrogen Dating of Archaeological Specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Donald J. Ortner ,
David W. vonEndt  and
Mary S. Robinson
Donald J. Ortner
Affiliation:
Division of Physical Anthropology Department of Anthropology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution
David W. vonEndt
Affiliation:
Division of Physical Anthropology Department of Anthropology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution
Mary S. Robinson
Affiliation:
Division of Physical Anthropology Department of Anthropology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inability to control for variables which affect protein decay is the major problem limiting the use of nitrogen as a chemical method of dating archaeological bone specimens. Of these variables, soil pH, ground water, and temperature are the major factors. In laboratory simulation experiments, we determined the effect of temperature on the time dependent decay rate of bone protein. In this research, 100 mg samples of ground cow bone were sealed in test tubes containing 5 ml of water and heated at temperatures varying from 100 degrees C to 140 degrees C for time periods up to 5 hr. Nitrogen concentration for each sample was determined using a modified micro-Kjeldahl method developed in our laboratory. Using standard regression analysis, we determined the decay rates of nitrogen for each temperature. By extrapolation from these data, we were able to show that differences in mean annual temperature between archaeological sites can have a substantial effect on the decay rate of bone protein.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 514 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butzer, Karl W. 1971 Environment and archaeology. Aldine, Chicago Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. 1960 Dating prehistoric bone by chemical analysis. In The application of quantitative methodsin archaeology, edited by Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., pp. 223–239. Viking Fund Publicationsin Anthropology 28.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Heizer, R. F. 1947 The quantitative investigation of aboriginalsites: analysis of human bone. AmericanJournal of Physical Anthropology N.S.5:201–219.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Heizer, R. F. 1953 Archaeological dating by chemical analysisof bone. South western Journal of Anthropology 9:231–238.Google Scholar
Doberenz, A. R., and Matter, P. III 1965 Nitrogen analysis of fossil bones. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 16: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerst, J. U. 1926 Vergleichendeuntersuchungsmethoden amskellett by saugern. In AbderhaldensHandbuchder BiologischenArbeitsmethoden Abt. VII, Teill, Heft 2, pp. 124–530.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1950 Relative dating of the Piltdown skull. Advancement of Science 6:343–344.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1963a Dating skeletal material. Science 140:488.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1963b Analytical methods of dating bones, in Science in archeology, edited by Brothwell, Don R. and Higgs, Eric, pp. 24–34. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar