Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:43:22.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earthworm Activity: A Source of Potential Disturbance of Archaeological Sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Julie K. Stein
Julie K. Stein*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, DH-05, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conspicuous disturbances in archaeological sites are readily detected during excavation. However, one animal whose destructive effects are not often recognized is the earthworm. Work at the Carlston Annis mound in Kentucky, an Archaic shell midden, has resulted in the identification of areas of extensive earthworm disturbance. Archaeological sites most readily affected are those with the appropriate vegetation cover, moisture and temperature conditions, and available chemical elements. The type of disturbance a site will undergo depends on the species of earthworms present. Subsurface-casting species mix matrix only below the surface while surface-casting species bring the fine-grained matrix to the surface, thus concentrating larger objects below ground. If earthworm casts are identified in a profile, one should proceed cautiously with interpretations concerning soil matrix.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 277 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Atkinson, R. J. C. 1957 Worms and Weathering. Antiquity 31:219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, K. P. 1959 The Influence of Earthworms on Soil Fertility, II. Consumption of Soil and Organic Matter by the Earthworm Allolobophora caliginosa. Australian Journal of Agricultural Resources 10:171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, K. P. 1961 The Abundance of Earthworms in Agricultural Land and Their Possible Significance in Agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 13:249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocock, K. L., and Gilbert, O. J. W. 1957 The Disappearance of Leaf Litter under Different Woodland Conditions. Plant and Soil 9:179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, R. 1964 Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Buntley, G. J., and Papendick, R. I. 1960 Worm-worked Soils of Eastern South Dakota, Their Morphology and Classification. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 24:128–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buol, S. W., Hole, F. D., and McCracken, R. J. 1973 Soil Genesis and Classification. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, J. G. 1972 Soil Geography. Halsted Press, New York.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1890 The Formation of Vegetable Mould Through the Action of Worms. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Davis, M. B. 1976 Pleistocene Biogeography of Temperate Deciduous Forests. Geoscience and Man 13:13–26.Google Scholar
Delcourt, P. A., and Delcourt, H. R. 1979 Late Pleistocene and Holocene Distributional History of the Deciduous Forest in Southeastern United States. Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH. Stiftung Rübel, Zurich 68:79–107.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A., and Lofty, J. R. 1972 Biology of Earthworms. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. 1948a Studies on the Relationships Between Earthworms and Soil Fertility, II. Some Effects of Earthwormson Soil Structure. Annals of Applied Biology 35:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. 1948b Relation of Worms to Soil Fertility. Discovery 9:83–86.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C, and McL. Guild, W. J. 1947 Studies on the Relationships Between Earthworms and Soil Fertility, I. Biological Studies in the Field. Annals of Applied Biology 34:307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C, and McL. Guild, W. J. 1948a Studies on the Relationships Between Earthworms and Soil Fertility, IV. On the Life Cyclesof Some British Lumbricidae. Annals of Applied Biology 35:471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C, and McL. Guild, W. J. 1948b Studies on the Relationships Between Earthworms and Soil Fertility, V. Field Populations. Annals of Applied Biology 35:485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folk, R. L. 1974 Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Gates, G. E. 1942 Check List and Bibliography of North American Earthworms. American Midland Naturalist 27:86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, G. E. 1961 Ecology of Some Earthworms with Special Reference to Seasonal Activity. American Midland Naturalist 66:61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, G. E. 1972 Toward a Revision of the Earthworm Family Lumbricidae. IV. The trapezoides Species Group. Contribution, North American Earthworm (Annelida), No. 3. Bulletin of the Tall Timbers Research Station 12:1–146.Google Scholar
Gerard, B. M. 1967 Factors Affecting Earthworms in Pastures. Journal of Animal Ecology 36:235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, O. J. W., and Bocock, K. L. 1960 Changes in Leaf Litter when Placed on the Surface of Soils with Contrasting Humus Types, II. Changes in Nitrogen Content of Oak and Ash Leaf Litter. Journal of Soil Science 11:10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, P. 1979 Micromorphology of Sediments from Hayonim Cave, Israel. Catena 6:167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, William C. Jr., 1955 Studies on Moisture Relationships in Earthworms. Ecology 36:400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, W. J. McL. 1948 Studies of the Relationship Between Earthworms and Soil Fertility, III. The Effect of Soil Type on the Structure of Earthworm Population. The Annals of Applied Biology 35:181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, W. J. McL. 1951 The Distribution and Population Density of Earthworms (Lumbricidae) in Scottish Pasture Fields. Journal of Animal Ecology 20:88–97.Google Scholar
Guild, W. J. McL. 1955 Earthworms and Soil Structure. In Soil Zoology (Proceedings of Nottingham School of AgriculturalScience), edited by Kevan, D. K. McE., pp. 83–98. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Kuhnelt, Wilhelm 1955 An Introduction to the Study of Soil Animals. In Soil Zoology (Proceedings of Nottingham School of Agricultural Science), edited by Kevan, D. K. McE., pp. 3–22. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Lunt, H. A., and Jacobson, G. M. 1944 The Chemical Composition of Earthworm Casts. Soil Science 58:367–375.Google Scholar
Marquardt, W. H., and Watson, P. J. 1976 Excavation and Recovery of Biological Remains from Two Archaic Shell Middens in Western Kentucky. Paper presented at Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.Google Scholar
Murchie, W. R. 1966 Diplocardia variresicula, a new Megascolecid Earthworm from Indiana (Oligochaeta). Ohio Journal of Science 66:609.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. M., and Satchell, J. E. 1962 The Extraction of Lumbricidae from Soil with Special Reference to the Hand-sorting Method. In Progress in Soil Zoology, edited by Murphy, P. W., pp. 294–299. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Olson, H. W. 1928 The Earthworms of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin 17:47–90.Google Scholar
Pitty, A. F. 1978 Geography and Soil Properties. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Rolfsen, Perry 1980 Disturbance of Archaeological Layers by Processes in the Soil. Norwegian Archaeological Review 13:110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, G. K. 1972 Soil Microscopy. Limestone Press, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
Satchell, J. E. 1955 Some Aspects of Earthworm Ecology. In Soil Zoology (Proceedings of Nottingham School of AgriculturalScience), edited by Kevan, D. K. McE., pp. 180–199. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Satchell, J. E. 1958 Earthworm Biology and Soil Fertility. Soils and Fertilizers 21:209–219.Google Scholar
Satchell, J. E. 1967 Lumbricidae. In Soil Biology, edited by Burges, A. and Raw, F., pp. 259–322. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Satchell, J. E., and Lowe, D. G. 1967 Selection of Leaf Litter by Lumbricus terrestris. In Progress in Soil Biology, edited by Graff, O. and Satchell, J. E., pp. 102–119. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schaller, Friedrich 1968 Soil Animals. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Schwendeman, J. R. 1958 Geography of Kentucky. Chattanooga, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Scully, N. J. 1942 Root Distribution and Environment in the Maple-Oak Forest. Botanical Gazette 103:492–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. 1929 An Account of Changes in the Earthworm Fauna of Illinois and a Description of One New Species. Illinois National History Survey Bulletin 17:347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1980 Geoarchaeoiogy of the Green River Shell Mounds, Kentucky. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Thorp, J. 1949 Effects of Certain Animals that Live in the Soil. Science Monthly 68:180–191.Google Scholar
Tischler, W. 1955 Effect of Agricultural Practice on the Soil Fauna. In Soil Zoology, edited by Kevan, D. K. McE., pp. 125–138. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. V. 1951 Cellulase and Chitinase of Earthworms. Nature 167:776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, Gail 1979 The Green River Archaic: A Botanical Reconstruction. Paper presented at Southeastern ArchaeologicalConference, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Waters, R. A. S. 1955 Numbers and Weights of Earthworms under Highly Productive Pasture. New Zealand Journal of Scientific Technology 36:516–525.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., and Marquardt, W. H. 1979 Shell Midden Formation and Deformation: A Case Study. Paper presented at Southeastern ArchaeologicalConference, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Wilde, S. A. 1958 Forest Soils: Their Properties and Relation to Silviculture. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wood, W. R., and Johnson, D. L. 1978 A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 315–381. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. E. Jr., 1976 The Dynamic Nature of Holocene Vegetation: A Problem in Paleoclimatology, Biogeography, andStratigraphic Nomenclature. Quaternary Research 6:581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. E. Jr., 1981 Vegetation East of the Rocky Mountains 18, 000 Years Ago. Quaternary Research 15:113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar