Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:40:22.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consider the Hermaphroditic Mind: Comment on “The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Barbara J. Little
Barbara J. Little*
Affiliation:
National Park Service, National Capital Region, 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W., Washington, DC 20242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alison Wylie (1992) provides an important discussion about the contribution of feminist research in archaeology by arguing that a feminist perspective can lead to a better, more rigorous science of archaeology. Her article inspires comment in three areas. First, the diversity within feminist theory and practice is emphasized by describing liberal, separatist, and socialist perspectives and how they might manifest themselves in archaeology. Second, the historical and political context of gender ideology and metaphor in the development of Western science is noted. The apparent need for feminist theory to defend its appropriateness is tied to this context. Third, feminist theory must, and will, rehabilitate the structure of that historically and politically constituted science.

Resumen

Resumen

Alison Wylie (1992) presenta una importante discusión sobre la contribución de la investigación feminista a la arqueología al argüir que una perspectiva feminista puede conducir a una mejor y más rigurosa ciencia de la arqueología. Su artículo inspira comentarios en tres áreas. Primero, la diversidad dentro de la teoría y práctica feminista está enfatizada por la descripción de las perspectivas liberal, separatista y socialista, y cómo éstas podrían manifestarse en arqueología. Segundo, se menciona el contexto histórico y político de la ideología de género y la metáfora en el desarollo de la ciencia occidental. La necesidad aparente de una teoría feminista que defienda su idoneidad está ligada a este contexto. Tercero, la teoría feminista debe—y lo hará—reabilitar la estructura de aquella ciencia historicamente y politicamente constituida.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 539 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Barrett, M. 1989 Some Different Meanings of the Concept of “Difference“ : Feminist Theory and the Concept of Ideology. In The Difference Within, Feminism and Critical Theory, edited by Meese, E. and Parker, A., pp. 37–48. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Conkey, M. W., with Williams, S. H. 1991 Original Narratives : The Political Economy of Gender in Archaeology. In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge : Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, edited by Leonardo, M. di, pp. 102–139. University of California Press, Berkeley,Google Scholar
di Leonardo, M. (editor) 1991 Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge : Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Easlea, B. 1980 Witch Hunting, Magic and the New Philosophy : An Introduction to Debates of the Scientific Revolution 1450-1750. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986 Reading the Past : Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991 Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 56 : 7–18.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1985 Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Leone, M. P. 1986 Symbolic, Structural and Critical Archaeology. In American Archaeology Past and Future, edited by Meltzer, D. J., Fowler, D. D., and Sabloff, J. A., pp. 415–438. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Little, B. J. 1994 “She was … an Example to her Sex“ : Possibilities for a Feminist Historical Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology of the Chesapeake, edited by Shackel, P. A. and Little, B. J., pp. 189–204. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1988 Feminism and Anthropology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C. 1990 History and the Post-Processual Archaeologies. Man 24 : 555–566.Google Scholar
Preucel, R. W. (editor) 1991 Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies : Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past. Occasional Paper No. 10. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Scott, J. W. 1989 History and Difference. In Learning About Women : Gender, Politics, and Power, edited by Conway, J. K., Bourque, S. C., and Scott, J. W., pp. 93–118. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1987 Re-Constructing Archaeology : Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spector, J. D., and Whelan, M. K. 1989 Incorporating Gender into Archaeology Courses. In Gender and Anthropology, Critical Reviews for Research and Teaching, edited by Morgen, S., pp. 65–94. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Watson, P. J. 1991 A Parochial Primer : The New Dissonance as Seen from the Midcontinental United States. In Processual and Postprocessual Archaeologies : Multiple Ways of Knowing the Past, edited by Preucel, R. W., pp. 265–274. Occasional Paper No. 10. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., and Fotiadis, M. 1990 The Razor's Edge : Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference. American Anthropologist 92 : 613–629.Google Scholar
Weedon, C. 1987 Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1992 The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests : Recent Archaeological Research on Gender. American Antiquity 57 : 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar