Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:33:43.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Buhl Burial: A Comment on Green et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Walter A. Neves  and
Max Blum
Walter A. Neves
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Estudos Evolutivos Humanos, Institute de BiociSncias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, C.P. 11461, 05422.970 Sao Paulo, SP, [email protected]
Max Blum
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Estudos Evolutivos Humanos, Institute de BiociSncias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, C.P. 11461, 05422.970 Sao Paulo, SP, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Green et al.’s (1998) recent contention that the Buhl Paleoindian craniofacial attributes are similar to other North American Indians and East Asian populations is tested here through a principal components analysis based on 16 cranial measurements. The analysis involved the comparison of the cranial morphology of the Buhl specimen with 26 Howells’ modern populations. We also added to the analysis the craniometric data regarding a firmly established South American Paleoindian skull (Lapa Vermelha IV, Hominid I), that shows craniofacial similarities to Africans and Australians. The results corroborate the ideas presented by Green et al.(1998) and Neves et al.(1998a). They suggest that the Americas were colonized in early times by two different populations, one of generalized sapiens, and another of classic Mongoloids, with a short interval of time between the migratory events.

Resumen

Resumen

La reciente asercíon de Green et al. (1998) de que el cráneo paleoindio de Buhl muestra atributos craneofaciales que son similares a los de otros indios norteamericanos y de poblaciones del Este Asiático se examina aquí a través del método de análisis de Componentes Principales, basado en 16 mediciones craneofaciales. Dicho análisis involucró la comparación de la morfología craneana del espécimen de Buhl con 26 poblaciones modernas de Howells. También fueron incluidos en el análisis los datos pertenencientes a un cráneo sudamericano (Lapa Vermelha TV, Hominido I) firmemente establecido como paleoindio y que muestra atributos craneofaciales similares a los de africanos y australianos. Los resultados confirmaron tanto la idea presentadapor Green et al. (1998) como la de Neves et al. (1998a). Se sugiere por consecuencia que las Américas fueron colonizadas en épocas tempranas por lo menos por dos poblaciones diferentes, una de sapiens generalizados y otra de mongoloides clásicos, con un corto intervalo de tiempo entre ambas migraciones.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 191 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Darroch, J. N., and Mosimann, J. E. 1985 Canonical and Principal Components of Shape. Biometrika 72: 241–252.Google Scholar
Green, T. J., Cochran, B., Fenton, T. W., Woods, J. C., litmus, G. L., Tieszen, L., Davis, M. A., and Miller, S. J. 1998 The Buhl Burial: A Paleoindian Woman from Southern Idaho. American Antiquity 63: 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, W.W. 1973 Cranial Variation in Man. A Study of Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 67. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Howells, W.W. 1989 Skull Shapes and the Map. Craniometric Analysis in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 79. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kamminga, J., and Wright, R. V. S. 1988 The Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian and the Origins of the Mongoloids. Journal of Human Evolution 17: 739–767.Google Scholar
Lahr, M. M. 1997 History in the Bones. Evolutionary Anthropology 6: 2–6.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munford, D., Zanini, M. C., and Neves, W. A. 1995 Human Cranial Variation in South America: Implications for the Settlement of the New World. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 18: 673–688.Google Scholar
Neves, W. A., Munford, D., and Zanini, M. C. 1996 Cranial Morphological Variation and the Colonization of the New World: Towards a Four Migration Model. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement 22: 176.Google Scholar
Neves, W. A., Powell, J. F., and Ozolins, E. G. 1999 Modern Human Origins as seen from the Peripheries. Journal of Human Evolution 37: 129–133.Google Scholar
Neves, W. A., Prous, A., Powell, J. F., and Ozolins, E. G. 1998 Lapa Vermelha IV, Hominid 1: Morphological Affinities of the Earliest Known American. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement 26: 169.Google Scholar
Neves, W. A., and Pucciarelli, H. M. 1998 The Zhoukoudian Upper Cave Skull 101 as Seen from the Americas. Journal of Human Evolution 34: 219–222.Google Scholar
Neves, W. A.,Zanini, M. C., Munford, D., and Pucciarelli, H. M. 1997 O Povoamento da America a luz da Morfologia Craniana. Revista USP 34: 96–105.Google Scholar
Powell, J. F., and Steele, D. G. 1992 A Multivariate Craniometric Analysis of North American Paleoindian Remains. Current Research in the Pleistocene 9: 59–62.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G., and Powell, J. F. 1992 Peopling of the Americas: Paleobiological Evidence. Human Biology 64: 303–336.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G., and Powell, J. F. 1993 Paleobiology of the First Americans. Evolutionary Anthropology 2: 138–146.Google Scholar
Steele, D. G., and Powell, J. F. 1994 Paleobiological Evidence of the Peopling of the Americas: A Morphometric View. In Method and Theory for Investigating the Peopling of the Americas, edited by Bonnichsen, R. and Steele, D.G.. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Wright, R. V. S. 1995 The Zhoukoudian Upper Cave Skull 101 and Multiregionalism. Journal of Human Evolution 29: 181–183.Google Scholar