No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Borrowed Concepts: Reply to Davy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Although Davy has defended the ecotone concept, it remains open to question on ecological grounds. A number of weaknesses in Davy's arguments are discussed. Davy's comments are themselves an illustration of the greater problem—the abuse of concepts borrowed from ecology.
- Type
- Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980
References
References Cited
Barick, F. B.
1950
The edge effect of the lesser vegetation of certain Adirondack forest types with particular referenceto deer and grouse. Floosevelt Wildlife Bulletin
9:1–146.Google Scholar
Chomko, Stephen A.
1978
Phillips Spring, 23H1216: a multicomponent site in the western Missouri Ozarks. Plains Anthropologist
23:235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, William R., and Miller, R. J.
1961
Edge types and abundance of bobwhites in southern Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management
25:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimstra, W. D., and Roseberry, J. L.
1975 Nesting ecology of the bobwhite in southern Illinois. Wildlife Monographs 41.Google Scholar
Odum, Eugene P.
1959
Fundamentals of ecology (second ed., with Howard T. Odum).
W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rhoades, Robert E.
1978
Archaeological use and abuse of ecological concepts and studies: the ecotone example. American Antiquity
43:608–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmits, Larry J.
1978
The Coffey site: environment and cultural adaptation at a prairie plains archaic site. Mid-Continental Journal of Archaeology
3:69–185.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Robert H.
1970
Communities and ecosystems. Current Concepts in Biology Series. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar