Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:20:32.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bifurcate-stemmed Projectile Points in the Eastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James E. Fitting
James E. Fitting*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1953 it was suggested that bifurcate-stemmed projectile points might serve as a horizon marker in the southwestern United States. Since then material has been reported which indicates that this is also true for the eastern United States. There are two types of bifurcate-stemmed points: a larger form which may be older than 5000 B.C. and a smaller form which appears to be more recent.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , July 1964 , pp. 92 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsden, Charles A. 1935 The Pinto Basin Artifacts. Southwest Museum Papers, No. 9, pp. 33-50. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bell, R. E. 1958 Guide to the Identification of Certain American Indian Projectile Points. Oklahoma Anthropological Society Special Bulletin, No. 1. Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
Cameron, James W. 1956 The Pine Tree Site: A Paleo-Indian Habitation Locality. Tennessee Archaeologist, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1–10. Knoxville.Google Scholar
Cambron, James W. and Waters, Spencer A. 1959 Flint Creek Rock Shelter (Part I). Tennessee Archaeologist, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 73–87. Knoxville.Google Scholar
Coe, Joffre Lanning 1959 Prehistoric Cultural Change and Stability in the Carolina Piedmont Area. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. 1956 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates I. Science, Vol. 124, pp. 664–72. Washington.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deevey, Edward S.( Gralenski, L. J., and Hoffren, Vanio 1959 Yale Natural Radiocarbon Measurements IV. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement, Vol. 1, pp. 144–72. New Haven.Google Scholar
DeVisscher, Jerry 1963 Surface Finds on Various Parts of the Holcombe Site Beach. The Totem Poie, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 37–8. Detroit.Google Scholar
Dragoo, Don W. 1959 Archaic Hunters of rhe Upper Ohio Valley. Carnegie Museum Anthropological Series, No. 3, pp. 139-246. Pittsburg.Google Scholar
Fitting, James E. 1963 An Early Post Fluted Point Tradition in Michigan: A Distributional Analysis. Michigan Archaeologist, Vol. 9, No. 2. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kneberg, Madeline 1956 Some Important Projectile Point Types Found in the Tennessee Area. Tennessee Archaeologist, Vol. 12, No. 1, PP. 17–28. Knoxville.Google Scholar
Lewis, Thomas M. N. and Kneberg Lewis, Madeline 1956 The Paleo-Indian Complex on the LeCroy Site. Tennessee Archaeologist, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 5–11. Knoxville. 1961: Eva: An Archaic Site. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Lister, Robert H. 1953 The Stemmed, Indented Base Point, A Possible Horizon Marker. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 3, p. 265. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Peske, G. Richard 1963 The Warner School Site and the Satchell Complex. MS on file at the University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1961 A Typology and Nomenclature for New York Projectile Points. New York State Museum and Science Service Bulletin, No. 384. Albany.Google Scholar
Stipp, J. J., Mott Davis, E., Noakes, John E., and Hoover, Tom E. 1962 University of Texas Radiocarbon Dates I. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement, Vol. 4, pp. 43–50. New Haven.Google Scholar
Suhm, Dee Ann, Krieger, Alex D., and Jelks, Edward B. 1954 An Introductory Handbook of Texas Archeology. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, Vol. 25. Austin.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Richard Page 1954 Two New Projectile Point Types: Duncan and Hanna Points. The Plains Anthropologist, No. 1, pp. 7-14. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard 1963 An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations, No. 10. Springfield.Google Scholar
Witthoft, John 1959 Notes on the Archaic of the Appalachian Region. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 79–85. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M. 1957 Ancient Man in North America. Denver Museum of Natural History Popular Series, No. 4. Denver.Google Scholar