Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:31:14.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arikara Native-Made Glass Pendants: Their Probable Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James H. Howard
James H. Howard*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological finds from the Leavenworth and Sully sites in South Dakota have served to revive interest in the use of native-made glass beads by the Arikara and neighboring tribes of the Upper Missouri region. Although the distribution of these objects and the techniques involved in their manufacture are known, little has been said concerning their function. Ethnographic data suggests that one type of native-made bead, the sub-triangular pendant, was a forelock ornament employed in a ceremony known as the Blue Bead rite. Associations of native-made pendants with skulls from the Leavenworth site would tend to support this hypothesis.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, A. H. (Editor) 1939 Tabeau’s narrative of Loisel’s expedition to the upper Missouri. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Denig, E. T. 1930 Indian tribes of the upper Missouri. Forty-sixth annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology .Google Scholar
Gilmore, M. R. 1924 Glass bead making by the Arikara. Indian Notes, Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation 1:21.Google Scholar
Howard, J. H. 1960 The cultural position of the Dakota: a reassessment. Essays in the science of culture in honor of Leslie A. White, edited by Dole, Gertrude E. and Carneiro, Robert L., pp. 249-268. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
Howard, J. H. 1966 The Dakota or Sioux Indians, a study in human ecology. The Dakota Museum, University of South Dakota, Anthropological Papers 3.Google Scholar
Matthews, Washington 1877 Ethnography and philology of the Hidatsa Indians. United States Geological and Geographical Survey, Miscellaneous Publication 7:21.Google Scholar
Ottaway, H. N. 1970 The Cheyenne arrow ceremony, 1968. Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Bulletin 19:1-60.Google Scholar
Powell, P. J. 1969 Sweet medicine, the continuing role of the sacred arrows, the sun dance, and the sacred buffalo hat in northern Cheyenne history 2. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Stirling, M. W. 1947 Arikara glassworking. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science 37:257-263.Google Scholar
Thwaites, R. G. (Editor) 1904-05 Original journals of the Lewis and Clark expedition 1804-06 . Dodd, Mead, New York.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D. H. 1966 Arikara-made glass pendants. Plains Anthropologist 32:172-173.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D. H., and Bass, W. M. 1970 Arikara glassworking techniques at Leavenworth and Sully sites. American Antiquity 35: 467-475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, W. R. 1955 Archeological materials from the vicinity of Mobridge, South Dakota. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 157:69-188.Google Scholar