Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T05:38:32.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Integrated Geoarchaeology of a Late Woodland Sand Mound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah C. Sherwood
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies, 735 University Ave., University of the South, Sewanee, TN 37383 ([email protected])
John H. Blitz
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, 19 ten Hoor Hall, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0210 ([email protected])
Lauren E. Downs
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Survey, 418 Mary Harmon Bryant, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 ([email protected])

Abstract

The Graveline Mound (22JA503) is a sand platform mound in Jackson County, Mississippi, built on a low, late Pleistocene terrace on the Mississippi Sound. The Late Woodland mound (A.D. 590–780) is composed of local soils, and its presence today is a testament to the ancient builders’ knowledge of earthen construction materials and methods. Central to the study of the mound is an integrated geoarchaeological approach that uses stratigraphy and micromorphology to decipher material source and selection, construction techniques, and periodicity, in combination with more traditional artifacts, revealing the activities that created this ultimately monumental space. The mound was built in three rapid stages beginning with a low earthwork demarcating a ritual precinct used during late spring/early summer. Stage II quickly followed with a series of alternating zoned fills, sealing the space that was then subsequently covered by Stage III, a massive hard red surface that marked the location with a platform mound.

Resumen

Resumen

El túmulo Graveline (22JA503) es un túmulo de plataforma de arena en Jackson County, Mississipi, y está construido en una terraza baja del Pleistoceno tardío en el Mississippi Sound. El túmulo de bosque tardío (590–780 d.D.) está conformado por unos suelos locales y su presencia hoy en día es un testamento al conocimiento de los constructores antiguos de los materiales y métodos de construcción terrenal. Fundamental para el estudio del túmulo es un enfoque integrado geoarqueológico que usa la estratigrafía y micromorfología para descodificar la fuente y la selección de materiales, la técnica de construcción y la periodicidad, combinándolo con artefactos más tradicionales, mostrando las actividades que crearon este espacio últimamente monumental. El túmulo fue construido en tres etapas rápidas empezando con un terraplén bajo que demarca un centro ritual que fue usado durante el final de la primavera y principios del verano. La segunda etapa siguió rápidamente con una la serie de rellenos alternos zonificados que sellan el espacio que posteriormente fue cubierto subsecuentemente por la tercera etapa, una superficie masiva, roja y dura que marcaba el lugar con un túmulo de plataforma.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Andrus, C. Fred, T., Blitz, John H., and Downs, Lauren E. 2011 Oxygen Isotope Season of Capture Records in Crassotrea virginica and Rangia cuneata Valves from the Graveline Site, Mississippi. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Jacksonville, Florida.Google Scholar
Blitz, John H., and Downs, Lauren E. 2011 Mound Excavation: Strata, Features and Chronology. In Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, edited by John H. Blitz and Lauren E. Downs, pp. 3561. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Blitz, John H., and Downs, Lauren E. (editors) 2011 Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Blitz, John H., and Baxter Mann, C. 2000 Fisherfolk, Farmers, and Frenchmen: Archaeological Explorations on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Archaeological Report No. 30. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, Edmond A. III 2011a Archaeological Investigations at Jackson Landing (22HA515): An Early Late Woodland Mound and Earthwork Site in Coastal Mississippi. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, Edmond A. III 2011b Dating the Construction of Early Late Woodland Earthen Monuments at the Jackson Landing Site in Coastal Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 30:351364.Google Scholar
Buol, Stanley W., Southard, Randal J., Graham, Robert C., and McDaniel, Paul A. 2003 Soil Genesis and Classification. 5th ed. Wiley-Black-well, Oxford.Google Scholar
Charles, Douglas K., Van Nest, Julieann, and Buikstra, Jane E. 2004 From the Earth: Minerals and Meaning in the Hopewellian World. In Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World, edited by Nicole Boivin and Mary Ann Owoc, pp. 4370. UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
Courty, Marie-Agnes, Goldberg, Paul, and Macphail, Richard I. 1989 Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
DeBoer, Warren R. 2005 Colors for a North American Past. World Archaeology 37:6691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Lauren E. 2011 Site Survey and Test Excavations. In Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, edited by John H. Blitz and Lauren E. Downs, pp. 2634. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Frierson, John L. 2002 South Carolina Prehistoric Earthen Indian Mounds. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of History, University of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Paul, and Macphail, Richard 2006 Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffiths, David 2011 The Archaeology of Sand Landscapes: Looking for an Integrated Approach. Scottish Archaeological Internet Report, 48. University of Oxford. Electronic document, http://www.sair.org.uk, accessed July 12, 2012.Google Scholar
Holtz, Robert D., and Kovacs, William D. 1981 An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Irwin, Jeffrey D., Boyko, Wayne C. J., Herbert, Joseph M., and Braley, Chad 1999 Woodland Burial Mounds in the North Carolina Sandhills and Southern Coastal Plain. North Carolina Archaeology 48:5986.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W. 2009 The Swift Creek Site and Woodland Platform Mounds in the Southeastern United States. In Ocmulgee Archaeology 1936–1986, edited by David J. Hally, pp. 7183. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Johnson, Delaney B. 2006 Soil Survey of Jackson County, Mississippi. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K., Haley, Bryan S., and Henry, Edward R. 2011 Geophysical Remote Sensing. In Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, edited by John H. Blitz and Lauren E. Downs, pp. 1925. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Kirchner, James W., Dietrich, William E., Iseya, Fujiko, and Ikeda, Hiroshi 1990 The Variability of Critical Shear Stress, Friction Angle, and Grain Protrusion in Water Worked Sediments. Sedimentology 37:647672.Google Scholar
Knight, James Vernon Jr. 1989 Symbolism of Mississippian Mounds. In Powhatan’s Mantle: Essays in Southeastern Ethnohistory, edited by Peter H. Wood, Gregory A. Waselkov, and M. Thomas Hatley, pp. 279291. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Knight, James Vernon Jr. 1990 Excavation of the Truncated Mound at the Walling Site: Middle Woodland Culture and Copena in the Tennessee Valley. Report of Investigations, 56. University of Alabama Division of Archaeology, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Knight, James Vernon Jr. 2001 Feasting and the Emergence of Platform Mound Ceremonialism in Eastern North America. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael Dietler and Brian Hayden, pp. 239254. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Kent G., and Luby, Edward M. 2012 Mound Building by California Hunter-Gatherers. In The Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology, edited by Timothy Pauketat, pp. 212223. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lindauer, Owen, and Blitz, John H. 1997 Higher Ground: The Archaeology of North American Platform Mounds. Journal of Archaeological Research 5:169207.Google Scholar
Mainfort, Robert C. Jr. 1988 Middle Woodland Ceremonialism at Pinson Mounds, Tennessee. American Antiquity 53:158173.Google Scholar
Milanich, Jerald T. 2002 Weeden Island Cultures. In The Woodland Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Robert C. Mainfort, Jr., pp. 352372. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Milner, George R. 2004 The Moundbuilders: Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America. Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Padmanabhan, Eswaran, and Eswaran, Hari 2006 Plinthite and Petroplinthite. In Encyclopedia of Soil Science, 2nd ed., edited by Rattan Lal, pp. 13141317. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Peles, Ashley A., and Margaret Scarry, C. 2011 Plant Remains. In Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, edited by John H. Blitz and Lauren E. Downs, pp. 129148. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Pluckhahn, Thomas J. 1996 Joseph Caldwell’s Summerour Mound (9FO16) and Woodland Platform Mounds in the Southeastern United States. Southeastern Archaeology 15:191211.Google Scholar
Pursell, Corin 2004 Geographic Distribution and Symbolism of Colored Mound Architecture in the Mississippian Southeast. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Russo, Michael 1996 Southeastern Archaic Mounds. In Archaeology of the Mid-Holocene Southeast, edited by Kenneth E. Sassaman and David G. Anderson, pp. 259287. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Scott, Susan L. 2011 Faunal Remains. In Graveline: A Late Woodland Platform Mound on me Mississippi Gulf Coast, edited by John H. Blitz and Lauren E. Downs, pp. 121128. Manuscript on file, Historic Preservation Division, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Scudder, Sylvia J. 2008 Anatomy of a Southwest Florida Sand Burial Mound: Smith Mound at the Pineland Site Complex. In Case Studies in Environmental Archaeology, 2nd ed., edited by Elizabeth Reitz, C. Margaret Scarry, and Sylvia J. Scudder, pp. 8194. Springer Science, New York.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C. 2006 Geoarchaeology Study of the Mound A Stratigraphy, Mound A, Shiloh National Military Park, Hardin County, Tennessee. Manuscript on file, Southeast Archeology Center, National Park Service, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C. 2011 A Geoarchaeological Perspective on the Construction of the Graveline Mound, Jackson County, Mississippi. Technical report on file at the Mississippi Department of Archives and History. Electronic document, http://environmental.sewanee.edu/assets/uploads/Geoarchaeological_Report_Graveline_Sherwood_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C., and Kidder, Tristram R. 2011 The DaVincis of Dirt: Geoarchaeological Perspectives on Native American Mound Building in the Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30:6987.Google Scholar
Smith, Marvin T., and Williams, Mark 1994 Mississippian Mound Refuse Disposal Patterns and Implications for Archaeological Research. Southeastern Archaeology 13:2735.Google Scholar
Stein, Julie K. 1987 Deposits for Archaeologists. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 337392. Academic Press, Orlando.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoops, Georges 2003 Guidelines for Analysis and Description of Soil and Regolith Thin Sections. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Thomas, David Hurst, and Larsen, Clark Spencer 1979 The Anthropology of St. Catherines Island 2. The Refuge-Deptford Mortuary Complex. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, 56(1). New York.Google Scholar
Thompson, Victor D., and Pluckhahn, Thomas J. 2012 Monumentalization and Ritual Landscapes at Fort Center in the Lake Okeechobee Basin of South Florida. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31:4965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterkorn, Hand F., and Fang, Hsai-Yang 1991 Soil Technology and Engineering Properties of Soils. In Foundation Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed., edited by Hsai-Yang Fang, pp. 88143. Kluwer, Norwell, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar