Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:25:14.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Approach to the Maya Correlation Problem Through Guatemala Highland Archaeology and Native Annals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Robert Wauchope
Robert Wauchope*
Affiliation:
Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The historic and proto-historic archaeological sites of the Guatemala highland provide another approach to the problem of correlating the ancient Maya calendar with the European. For native annals of the highland tribes list the generations of Indian rulers from the time of the Spanish Conquest back into prehistoric phases, which one may expect the archaeologist will eventually link to remains that are associated elsewhere with dates in the Long Count.

If, for example, we can identify a certain trait complex as one brought to Guatemala by the Quiches and other tribes entering this country from the north, and if we can calculate the approximate date of their arrival by counting generations listed in the native annals, we can then assign this date to the same complex in an area where it is dated in the Maya Long Count.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , July 1947 , pp. 59 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brinton, Daniel G. 1885. Annals of the Cakchiquels. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Butler, Mary 1940. “A Pottery Sequence from the Alta Verapaz, Guatemala.” In The Maya and Their Neighbors, pp. 250-67. New York.Google Scholar
Fuentes V Guzman, Francisco Antonio De 1933. Recordación Florida. Guatemala: Sociedad de Geografía e Historia.Google Scholar
Long, Richard C. E. 1934. “The Dates in the Annals of the Cakchiquels and a Note on the 260-Day Period of the Maya.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 54, pp. 57–68. London.Google Scholar
Remesal, Antonio De 1932. Historia general de las indias occidentales. Guatemala: Sociedad de Geografía e Historia.Google Scholar
Spinden, Herbert J. 1924. “The Reduction of Mayan Dates.” Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 6, No. 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric 1941. “A Coordination of the History of Chichen Itza with Ceramic Sequences in Central Mexico.” Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos, Vol. 5, pp. 97–111. Mexico.Google Scholar
Wauchope, Robert 1941. “Effigy Head Supports from Zacualpa, Guatemala.” In Los Mayas Antiguos, pp. 211-32. Mexico.Google Scholar
Wauchope, Robert 1942. “Notes on the Age of the Cieneguilla Cave Textiles, Chiapas.” Middle American Research Records, Tulane University, Vol. I, No. 2. New Orleans.Google Scholar
Wauchope, Robert 1945. “Cremations at Zacualpa, Guatemala.” XXVII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, pp. 564-73. Mexico.Google Scholar
Ximenez, Francisco 1929. Historia de la provincia de San Vicente de Chiapa y Guatemala. Guatemala: Sociedad de Geograffa e Historia.Google Scholar