Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:44:05.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Alternative View of Sedentary Period Hohokam Shell-Ornament Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Deni J. Seymour
Deni J. Seymour*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of unpublished house floor and fill data has revealed new information concerning the production and distribution of shell artifacts at the Hohokam site of Snaketown. In addition to presenting data on the frequency and distribution of shell in structures, the analysis identifies manufacturing loci and evaluates previous statements concerning craft production at the site. Implications for the organization of production and exchange during the Sacaton phase also are considered. It is concluded that local kin groups could have procured, produced, and distributed shell products. This reconstruction is provided as an alternative to views which hold that a higher-level administrative agency was in control of the production and distribution of marine shell.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 812 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References cited

Adams, R. E. W. 1970 Suggested Classic Period Occupational Specialization in the Southern Maya Lowlands. In Monographs and Papers in Maya Archaeology, edited by Bullard, W. R. Jr., pp. 487-502. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 61. Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arizona State Museum Archive 1965a Pit Excavation Forms, Snaketown Excavations, 1964-1965. Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Arizona State Museum Archive 1965b Pithouse Excavation Forms, Snaketown Excavations, 1964-1965. Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Arizona State Museum Archive 1965c Sciscenti Field Notebook No. 2, Snaketown Excavations, 1964-1965. Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona Library, Tucson.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. 1968 Yanomamo : The Fierce People. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Colberg-Sigleo, A. 1975 Turquoise Mine and Artifact Correlations for Snaketown Site, Arizona. Science 189 : 459-460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGarmo, G. D. 1977 Identification of Prehistoric Intra-settlement Exchange. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Earle, T. K. and Ericson, J. E., pp. 153-170. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, M. N. 1967a Introduction : Economic Relations in Peasant Society. In Peasant Society : A Reader, edited by Potter, J. M., Diaz, M. N., and Foster, G. M., pp. 50-56. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Diaz, M. N. 1967b Opposition and Alliance in a Mexican Town. In Peasant Society : A Reader, edited by Potter, J. M., Diaz, M. N., and Foster, G. M., pp. 168-174. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Doelle, W. H. 1980 Past Adaptive Patterns in Western Papagueria : An Archaeological Study of Nonriverine Resource Use. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Doelle, W. H. 1981 Past Adapative Patterns in Western Papagueria. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Diego.Google Scholar
Efnand, R. W. Jr. 1984 Archaeological and Historical Cultural Assessment for the Western Area Power Administration, Liberty to Coolidge Rebuild Project. Cultural Resources Report No. 16. Archaeological Consulting Services, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Ford, R. I. 1972 Barter, Gift, or Violence : An Analysis of Tewa Intertribal Exchange. In Social Exchange and Interaction, edited by Wilmsen, E. N., pp. 21-45. Anthropological Papers No. 46. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gasser, R. and Miksicek, C. 1985 The Specialists : A Reappraisal of Hohokam Exchange and the Archaeobotanical Record. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, pt. 2, edited by Dittert, A. E. Jr. and Dove, D. E., pp. 483-498. Occasional Paper No. 2. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. A. 1982 The Morphology of Platform Mounds and the Structure of Classic Period Hohokam Sites. Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Anthropology, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1937 Shell. In Excavations at Snaketown : Material Culture, edited by Gladwin, H. S., Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Gladwin, N., pp. 135-153. Medallion Papers No. 25. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1950 The Stratigraphy and Archaeology ofVentana Cave. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1976 The Hohokam : Desert Farmers and Craftsmen. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hayden, J. D. 1972 Hohokam Petroglyphs of the Sierra Pinacate, Sonora and the Hohokam Shell Expeditions. The Kiva 37 : 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskovitz, M. J. 1940 The Economic Life ofPrimitve Peoples. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Howard, A. V. 1983 The Organization of Interregional Shell Production and Exchange within Southwestern Arizona. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Howard, A. V. 1985 A Reconstruction of Hohokam Interregional Shell Production and Exchange Within Southwestern Arizona. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, pt. 2, edited by Dittert, A. E. Jr. and Dove, D. E., pp. 459-472. Occasional Paper No. 2. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Howard, J. 1985 Courtyard Groups and Domestic Cycling : A Hypothetical Model of Growth. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, pt. 1 , edited by Dittert, A. E. Jr. and Dove, D., pp. 311-326. Occasional Paper No. 2. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1966 Changing Patterns of Social Integration : A Prehistoric Example From the American Southwest. American Anthropologist 68 : 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1961 Argonauts of the Western Pacific. E. P. Dutton, New York.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1954 The Gift : Forms and Function of Exchange in Archaic Society. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. H. 1985 The Role of Shell Exchange in the Explanation of Hohokam Prehistory. In Proceedings of the 1983 Hohokam Symposium, pt. 2, edited by Dittert, A. E. Jr. and Dove, D. E., pp. 473-482. Occasional Paper No. 2. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. H., and Howard, A. V. 1987 The Structure and Organization of Hohokam Shell Exchange. The Kiva 52 : 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. 1984 Mississippian Specialization and Salt. American Antiquity 49 : 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. 1986 Pans and a Grain of Salt : Mississippian Specialization Revisited. American Antiquity 51 : 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, M. 1966 Primitive and Peasant Economic Systems. Chandler, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. S. 1981 The Role of the Pochteca System in Hohokam Exchange. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Rafferty, K. 1982 Hohokam Micaceous Schist Mining and Ceramic Craft Specialization : An Example from Gila Butte, Arizona. Anthropology 6(1 and 2) : 199-222.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1975 Trade as action at a Distance : Questions of Integration and Communication. In Ancient Civilization and Trade, edited by Sabloff, J. A. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., pp. 3-59. School of American Research, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Russell, F. 1908 The Pima Indians. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology No. 26. Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Seymour, D. J. 1985 Evidence for the Production and Distribution of Artifacts at Snaketown. Ms. on file, Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Seymour, D. J. 1986 The Social Implications of Artifact Distributions at Snaketown, Arizona. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans. Google Scholar
Seymour, D. J. 1988 Investigations into Prehistoric Community Patterns and Activity Organization at Snaketown, Arizona. Ms. in possession of author.Google Scholar
Seymour, D. J., and Schif Ter, M. B. 1987 A Preliminary Analysis of Pithouse Assemblages from Snaketown, Arizona. In Method and Theory for Activity Area Research— An Ethnoarchaeological Approach, edited by Kent, S., pp. 549-603. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Underhill, R. 1939 Social Organization of the Papago Indians. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Vokes, A. 1983a The Shell Assemblage of the Salt-Gila Aqueduct Project Sites. In Material Culture, edited by Teague, L. S. and Crown, P. L., pp. 463-550. Hohokam Archaeology Along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct, Central Arizona Project, vol. 8. Archaeological Series 150(8). Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Vokes, A. 1983b Trash is Trash or Is It? Ms. on file, Arizona State Museum Library, University of Arizona, Tuscon.Google Scholar
Voorhies, B. 1973 Possible Social Factors in the Exchange System of the Prehistoric Maya. American Antiquity 38 : 486–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, D. R., McGuire, T. R., and Sternberg, C. 1981 Snaketown Revisited : A Partial Cultural Resource Survey. Archaeological Series 155. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. R., and Sternberg, C. 1983 Hohokam Ballcourts and Their Interpretation. Archaeological Series 160. Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E. N. 1972 Introduction : The Study of Exchange as Social Interaction. In Social Exchange and Interaction, edited by Wilmsen, E. N., pp. 1-4. Anthropological Papers No. 46. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. CrossRefGoogle Scholar