Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:27:23.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Locational Analysis at Chisalin, Guatemala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles F. Ward III
Charles F. Ward III*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, 33rd and Spruce Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A critique of the methods of locational analysis used by Carmack and Weeks (1981) at the Maya site of Chisalin, Guatemala is presented. The applicability of the “nearest neighbor” statistic to this densely occupied hilltop site is questioned, as is its use to discriminate architectural groups.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 132 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Blanton, R. E. 1978 Monte Albán: settlement patterns at the ancient Zapotec capital. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, P. J., and Evans, F. C. 1954 Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. D. C. 1972 Locational models and the site of Lubaantun: a Classic Maya centre. In Models in archaeology, edited by Clarke, D. L., pp. 757–800. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., and Orton, C. 1976 Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar