Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:17:24.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pollen Analysis and Its Bearing upon American Prehistory: A Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Loren C. Eiseley
Loren C. Eiseley*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Extending over a wide area in northern and central Europe great beds of peat cover stretches of moor and occupy valleys and depressions where sluggish drainage has favored the growth of marsh vegetation. More than any other soil type they are entirely dependent in substance on the vegetation which they support. Thus they are peculiarly reflective of changes of a climatic nature, and this, combined with the preservative effects of bog acid, both upon pollens and artifacts, has made them a peculiarly effective medium for investigation. While most thoroughly studied in Europe, peats occur in both the northern and southern hemisphere wherever conditions permit. Typically and most extensively however, they are a circumpolar phenomenon closely attendant upon glaciation.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , October 1939 , pp. 115 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. C. 1902. The Southeastern United States as a Center of Geographical Distribution of Flora and Fauna. Biological Bulletin, 3.Google Scholar
Allen, G. M. 1919. The American Collared Lemmings, Dicrostonyx. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy, Harvard, 62: No. 13.Google Scholar
Antevs, Ernst. 1928. The Last Glaciation. American Geographical Society Research Series No. 17.Google Scholar
Auer, Vaino. 1927. Stratigraphical and Morphological Investigations of Peat Bogs of Southeastern Canada. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Auer, Vaino. 1930. Peat Bogs in Southeastern Canada. Canadian Geological Survey, Memoir 162.Google Scholar
Auer, Vaino. 1933. Verschiebungen der Wald und Steppengebiete Feuerlands in postglacialer Zeit. Acta Geographica, Helsingfors, 5.Google Scholar
Barkeley, F. 1934. The Statistical Theory of Pollen Analysis. Ecology, 13.Google Scholar
Bell, E. H. and Van Royen, Willem. 1934. An Evaluation of Recent Nebraska Finds Sometimes Attributed to the Pleistocene. Wisconsin Archaeologist, N.S., 13.Google Scholar
Berry, Edward W. 1912. Notes on the Present Status of Paleobotany. The Plant World, 15.Google Scholar
Blake, I. H. 1926. A Comparison of the Animal Communities of Coniferous and Deciduous Forest. Illinois Biological Monographs, 10.Google Scholar
Blytt, A. 1882. Die Theorie der wechselnden kontinentalen und insularen Klimate. Bot. Jb. 11.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. E. P. 1931a. Changes in Climate in the Old World during Historic Time. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 57.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. E. P. 1931b. The Correlation of Pluvial Periods in Africa with Climatic Changes in Europe. Appendix B in Leakey, L. S. B. The Stone Age Cultures of Kenya Colony, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bryan, Kirk. 1928. Glacial Climate in Non-Glaciated Regions. American Journal of Science, 16.Google Scholar
Bryan, Kirk. 1932. Paleoclimatology in North America as a Result of the Study of Peat Bogs. Zeitschrift fur Gletscherkunde, 20.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. G. 1936. The Mesolithic Settlement of Northern Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, William S. 1935. The History of the Upper Mississippi River in Late Wisconsin and Post Glacial Times. Minnesota Geological Survey, Bulletin 26.Google Scholar
Cotter, J. Lambert. 1935. Folsom and Yuma Artifacts. Master of Arts Thesis, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Cowles, H. C. 1928. Persistence of Prairies. Ecology, 9.Google Scholar
Dachnowski-Stokes, A. P. 1921. Peat Deposits and their Evidence of Climatic Changes. Botanical Gazette, 72.Google Scholar
Dachnowski-Stokes, A. P. 1922. The Correlation of Time Units and Climatic Changes in Peat Deposits of the United States and Europe. Proceedings National Academy of Science, 8.Google Scholar
Dachnowski-Stokes, A. P. 1935. Peat Land as a Conserver of Rainfall and Water Supplies. Ecology, 16.Google Scholar
Eiseley, L. C. 1937. Index Mollusca and their Bearing on Certain Problems of Pre-history: A Critique. Twenty-fifth Anniversary Studies, Philadelphia Anthropological Society, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, G. 1931a. The Boreal Hazel Forests and the Theory of Pollen Statistics. Proceedings, Fifth International Botanical Congress, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, G. 1931b. Pollen Statistics; A New Research Method in Paleo-ecology. Science, N.S., Vol. 73.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, G., and H. Erdtmann. 1933. The Improvement of Pollen Analysis Technique. Svensk. Bot. Tidskrift, 27.Google Scholar
Fernald, M. L. 1935. Critical Plants of the Upper Great Lake Region of Ontario and Michigan. Rhodora, 37Google Scholar
Flint, R. F. 1930. The Glacial Geology of Connecticut. Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut. Bulletin 47.Google Scholar
Fuller, G. D. 1935. Post Glacial Vegetation of the Lake Michigan Region. Ecology, 16.Google Scholar
De Geer, Gerard. 1933. International Geo-chronology; Its Origin and Scope. Pan American Geologist, 60.Google Scholar
Giles, A. W. 1930. Peat as a Climatic Indicator. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 41.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1922. The Vegetational History of the Middle West. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 12.Google Scholar
Godwin, H. 1934. Pollen Analysis: An Outline of the Problems and Potentialities of the Method, Part II. The New Phytologist, 33.Google Scholar
Griggs, Robert F. 1937.Timberlines as Indicators of Climatic Trends. Science, N.S., 85.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. P. 1937. Pollen Analysis of two Wisconsin Bogs of Different Age. Ecology, 18.Google Scholar
Howard, Edgar B. 1935. Evidence of Early Man in North America. University of Pennsylvania Museum Journal, 24.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A. H. 1918. Limiting Factors in Relation to Specific Ranges of Tolerance of Forest Trees. Botanical Gazette, 66.Google Scholar
Kay, G. F. 1931. Classification and Duration of the Pleistocene Period. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 42.Google Scholar
Knapp, G. N. 1923. The Foundry Sands of Minnesota. The Minnesota Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 18.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G. 1905. StratiotesaloidesL.funnen i Sveriges post glaciala aflagringar. Geol. Foren., Stockholm, Forh, 27.Google Scholar
Lane, G. 1931. A Preliminary Pollen Analysis of the East McCulloch Peat. Ohio Journal of Science, 31.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H. 1924. Factors Controlling Forest Succession on Lake Itasca, Minnesota. Botanical Gazette, 78.Google Scholar
Leverett, Frank. 1930. Problems of the Glacialist, Science, N.S., 71.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. F. and E. C., Cocke. 1929. Pollen Analysis of Dismal Swamp Peat. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Society, 45.Google Scholar
Macclintock, Paul. 1935. Investigation of the Geology of the Yuma-Folsom Sites in Western Nebraska. Carnegie Institution Yearbook Number 34. Washington.Google Scholar
Mclaughlin, W. D. 1932. Atlantic Coastal Plain Plants in the Sand Barrens of Northwestern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 2.Google Scholar
Newbigin, Marion I. 1936. Plant and Animal Geography. London, Methuen and Company.Google Scholar
Oswald, H. 1935. A Bog at Hartford, Michigan. Ecology, 16.Google Scholar
Von Post, L. 1931. Problems and Working Lines in the Post-Arctic Forest History of Europe. Fifth International Botanical Congress, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, F. L. W. Jr., 1937. Review of R. G. Fisher, The Relation of North American Prehistory to Postglacial Climatic Fluctuations (1935). American Antiquity, Vol. II.Google Scholar
Rigg, George B. 1916. A Summary of Bog Theories. Plant World, 19.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. H. Jr., 1936. Additional Information on the Folsom Complex. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95.Google Scholar
Schwartz, George M. 1936. The Geology of the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area. Minnesota Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 27.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B. 1932a. Archaeology of Environment in Eastern North America. American Anthropologist, Vol. 34.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B. 1932b. Postglacial Climate in Eastern North America, Ecology, 13.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B. 1935. Types of North America Pollen Profiles. Ecology, 16.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B. 1937. Pollen Profiles in the United States as an aid in Dating Cultural Deposits Early Man, ed. MacCurdy, G. G., Lippincott.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B. 1938. Climatic Interpretation of Postglacial Pollen Deposits in North America Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 19.Google Scholar
Sears, Paul B., and Janson, Elsie. 1933. The Rate of Peat Growth in the Erie Basin. Ecology, 14.Google Scholar
Sernander, R. 1908. On the Evidence of the Postglacial Changes of Climate Furnished by the Peat Mosses of Northern Europe. Geol. Foren., Stockholm, Forh, 30.Google Scholar
Seward, Albert. 1931. Plant Life Through the Ages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soper, E. K. 1919. The Peat Deposits of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey Bulletin No. 16, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1935. An Introduction to Nebraska Archaeology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 93.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1920. Two Vegetational Maps of the United States. Journal of Ecology, 8.Google Scholar
Transeau, E. N. 1935. The Prairie Peninsula. Ecology, 16.Google Scholar
Voss, John. 1934. Postglacial Migration of Forests in Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Botanical Gazette, 96.Google Scholar
Voss, John. 1937a. Comparative study of Bogs on Carey and Tazewell Drift in Illinois. Ecology, 18.Google Scholar
Voss, John. 1937b. Letter to the author, December 12, 1937.Google Scholar