Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:17:19.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Prey Mobility, Prey Rank, and Foraging Goals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew Ugan  and
Steven Simms
Andrew Ugan
Affiliation:
Departamento de Antropología, Museo de Historia Natural, Parque Moriano Moreno, (5600)San Rafael, Mendoza, Argentina
Steven Simms
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In their recent paper “In Pursuit of Mobile Prey,” Bird, Bliege-Bird, and Codding (2009) identify a negative relationship between body size and post-encounter returns among Martu prey in western Australia, attributing the phenomena to the greater mobility of large animals and associated risk of hunting failure. While this phenomenon has implications for archaeological applications of foraging models that assume body size and on-encounter returns are positively correlated, the Martu data may be less exceptional than they appear. Here we outline the reasons for our skepticism, point out areas in which we are in agreement, and build upon their findings by exploring the trade-offs between foraging to maximize efficiency and immediate returns and foraging for purposes other than immediate provisioning.

En su redente artículo “On the Pursuit of Mobile Prey,” Bird, Bliege-Bird, y Codding (2009) identifican una relación entre el tamaño y la tasa de rendimiento post-encuentro de la presa de los Martu en el oeste de Australia, y atribuyen el fenómeno al mayor movilidad de animales grandes y el riesgo asociado de no matarlas. Aunque esto fenómeno tiene implicaciones por las aplicaciones de modelos de forrajear que asumen que el tamaño del cuerpo y la tasa de rendimiento son positivamente correlacionados, los datos del Martu pueden ser menos excepcional que parecen. Aquí presentamos las razones por nuestras dudas, indicamos áreas en que estamos de acuerdo con la posición de Bird et al., y aprovechamos sus resultados para discutir los compromisos entre forrajear para maximizar eficiencia y retornos inmediatos y forrajear para propuestos además de abastecimiento inmediato.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 179 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Alvard, Michael, 1993 Testing the “Ecologically Noble Savage” Hypothesis: Interspecific Prey Choice by Piro Hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology 21:355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayham, Frank, 1979 Factors Influencing the Archaic Patterns of Animal Exploitation. The Kiva 44(2–3):219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., 1999 What Happened in the Medithermal? In Models for the Millennium: Great Basin Anthropology Today, edited by C. Beck, pp. 62–74. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Bird, Douglas, Bliege-Bird, Rebecca, and Codding, Brian 2009 In Pursuit of Mobile Prey: Martu Hunting Strategies and Archaeofaunal Interpretation. American Antiquity 74:3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliege Bird, Rebecca, and Bird, Douglas 2008 Why Women Hunt: Risk and Contemporary Foraging in a West Desert Aboriginal Community. Current Anthropology 49:655–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliege Bird, Rebecca, and Bird, Douglas 2005 Human Hunting Seasonality. In Primate Seasonality: Studies of Living and Extinct Human and Nonhuman Primates, edited by D. Brockman and C. van Shaik, pp. 243–266. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliege Bird, Rebecca, Smith, Eric Alden, and Bird, Douglas 2001 The Hunting Handicap: Costly Signaling in Human Foraging Strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Blurton, Nicholas, G., Hawkes, Kristen, and O’-Connell, James F. 1996 The Global Process and Local Ecology: How Should We Explain Differences between the Hadza and the !Kung? In Cultural Diversity among Twentieth Century Foragers: An African Perspective, edited by S. Kent, pp. 159–187. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Broughton, Jack, and Bayham, Frank 2003 Showing Off, Foraging Models, and the Ascendance of Large-Game Hunting in the California Middle Archaic. American Antiquity 68:783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, Jack M., Cannon, Michael D., Bayham, Frank E., and Byers, David A. 2011 Prey Body Size and Ranking in Zooarchaeology: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Applications from the Northeastern Great Basin. American Antiquity 76:403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damuth, John, 1987 Interspecific Allometry of Population Density in Mammals and other Animals: The Independence of Body Mass and Population Energy Use. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 31:193–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damuth, John, 1981 Population Density and Body Size in Mammals. Nature 290:699–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., 2009 Privatization of Resources and the Evolution of Prehistoric Leadership Strategies. In The Evolution of Leadership: Transitions in Decision Making from Small-Scale to Middle-Range Societies, edited by Kevin J. Vaughn, Jelmer W. Eerkens, and John Kantner, pp. 73–96. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen, 2004 Mating, Parenting and the Evolution of Human Pair Bonds. In Kinship and Behavior in Primates, edited by B. Chapais and C. Berman, pp. 443–473. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen, 1993 Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods. Current Anthropology 34:341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, Kristen, 1991 Showing off: Tests of an Hypothesis about Men’s Foraging Goals. Ethnology and Sociobiology 12:29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iawkes, Kristen, and Bird, Rebecca Bliege 2002 Showing Off, Handicap Signaling, and the Evolution of Men’s Work. Evolutionary Anthropology 11:58–67.Google Scholar
Krebs, John R., and Davies, Nicholas B. 1978 Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Sciences, Oxford.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kelly R., and Hildebrandt, William R. 2005 Re-Thinking Great Basin Foragers: Prestige Hunting and Costly Signaling during the Middle Archaic Period. American Antiquity 70:695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, Thomas W., 1971 Theory of Feeding Strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, Steven R., 2008 Ancient Peoples of the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric Alden, 1991 Inujjuamiut Foraging Strategies. Aldine De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Stiner, Mary C., and Munro, Natalie 2002 Approaches to Prehistoric Diet Breadth, Demography, and Prey Ranking Systems in Time and Space. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9:181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiner, Mary C., Munro, Natalie, and Surovell, Todd 2000 The Tortoise and the Hare: Small-Game Use, the Broad-Spectrum Revolution, and Paleolithic Demography. Current Anthropology 41:39–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiner, Mary C., Munro, Natalie, Surovell, Todd, Tchernov, Eitan, and Bar-Yosef, Ofer 1999 Paleolithic Population Growth Pulses Evidenced by Small Animal Exploitation. Science 283:190–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, Robert, 1985 Social Evolution. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
Ugan, Andrew, 2005 Does Size Matter? Body Size, Mass Collecting, and Their Implications for Understanding Prehistoric Foraging Behavior. American Antiquity 70:75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmer, Pat, Stone, Graham, and Johnson, Ian 2000 Environmental Physiology of Animals. Blackwell Sciences, Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, Bruce, 1981 Foraging Strategies in the Boreal Forest: An Analysis of Cree Hunting and Gathering. In Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Archaeological Analyses, edited by B. Winterhalder and E. A. Smith, pp. 66–98. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Zeanah, David, and Simms, Steven R. 1999 Modeling the Gastric: Great Basin Subsistence Studies since 1982 and the Evolution of General Theory. In Models for the Millennium: Great Basin Anthropology Today, edited by C. Beck, pp. 118–140. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar