Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:57:43.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dated Eskimo Ruins of an Inland Zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

J. L. Giddings Jr.
J. L. Giddings Jr.*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Eskimo culture is divided ecologically, Froelich Rainey says in a review of published accounts, into “the Arctic coastal zone in the area of sea ice” and “the sub-Arctic zone south of the maximum extension of heavy sea ice, in Southern Alaska and Greenland… . A third ecologic zone is that region occupied by Eskimo people with an inland form of culture which has been most clearly defined by Kaj Birket-Smith in his description of the Caribou Eskimo of the Barren Grounds northwest of Hudson Bay; but a similar type of inland Arctic culture occurs also in north Alaska. The prehistory of the inland zone is unknown, since no archaeological research has been carried on in that region.”

The italicized lines point to a vast gap in knowledge of the Eskimo past. The inland zone remains largely unknown because of two handicaps to archaeological exploration: the nomadic nature of any far-inland hunting culture about the Arctic Circle precludes the possibility of large and permanent villages, and.organic materials disintegrate rapidly under the climatic contrasts of the interior.

Type
Reply
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , October 1944 , pp. 113 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIRKET-SMITH, KAJ 1929. The Caribou Eskimos. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition, Vol. 5. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
COLLINS, HENRY B. Jr. 1937. Archeology of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 96, No. 1. Washington.Google Scholar
DE LAGUNA, FREDERICA 1934. The Archaeology of Cook Inlet, Alaska. Published for the University Museum, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE LAGUNA, FREDERICA 1936. “An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Middle and Lower Yukon Valley, Alaska.” American Antiquity, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 6–12. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE LAGUNA, FREDERICA 1939. “A Pottery Vessel from Kodiak Island, Alaska.” American Antiquity, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 334–343. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GEIST, OTTO W., and RAINEY, FROELICH G. 1936. Archaeological Excavations at Kukulik, St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. Miscellaneous Publications, University of Alaska, Vol. 2. Washington.Google Scholar
GIDDINGS, J. L. Jr. 1942a. “Dated Sites on the Kobuk River, Alaska.” Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 9, No. 1.Google Scholar
GIDDINGS, J. L. Jr. 1942b. Dendrochronology in Northern Alaska. Published jointly by the University of Arizona and the University of Alaska. University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, Bulletin 1; University of Alaska Publication, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
JENNESS, DIAMOND 1928. “Ethnological Problems of Arctic'America.” Problems of Polar Research, American Geographical Society, Special Publication No. 7, pp. 167–175. New York.Google Scholar
JOCHELSON, WALDEMAR 1925. Archaeological Investigations in the Aleutian Islands. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 367. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MASON, J. ALDEN 1930. Excavations of Eskimo Thule Culture Sites at Point Barrow, Alaska. Proceedings of the Twenty-third International Congress of Americanists, New York, 1928, pp. 383–394. New York.Google Scholar
MATHIASSEN, THERKEL 1927. Archaeology of the Central Eskimos. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition, Vol. 4, Parts 1 and 2. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
MATHIASSEN, THERKEL 1930a. Archaeological Collections from the Western Eskimo. Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition, Vol. 10, No. 1. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
MATHIASSEN, THERKEL 1930b. “The Question of the Origin of the Eskimo Culture.” American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 32, pp. 591–607. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MURDOCH, JOHN 1892. Ethnological Results of the Point Barrow Expedition. Bureau of American Ethnology, Ninth Annual Report. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NELSON, EDWARD W. 1899. The Eskimo about Bering Strait. Bureau of American Ethnology, Eighteenth Annual Report, Part 1. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSGOOD, CORNELIUS. 1936a. Contributions to the Ethnography of the Kutchin. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 14. New Haven.Google Scholar
OSGOOD, CORNELIUS. 1936b. The Distribution of the Northern Athapascan Indians. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 7. New Haven.Google Scholar
OSGOOD, CORNELIUS. 1937. The Ethnography of the Tanaina. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 16. New Haven.Google Scholar
OSGOOD, CORNELIUS. 1940. Ingalik Material Culture. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 22. New Haven.Google Scholar
RAINEY, FROELICH G. 1939. Archaeology in Central Alaska. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 36, Part 4. New York.Google Scholar
RAINEY, FROELICH G. 1941a. Eskimo Prehistory: TheOkvik Site on the Punuk Islands. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 37, Part 4. New York.Google Scholar
RAINEY, FROELICH G. 19416. “The Ipiutak Culture at Point Hope, Alaska.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 43, pp. 364–375. Menasha.Google Scholar
WISSLER, CLARK 1916. Harpoons and Darts in the Stefansson Collection. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 14, Part 2. New York.Google Scholar