Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:05:02.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined Thermal and X-Ray Diffraction Technique for Identification of Ceramicware Temper and Paste Minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wayne C. Isphording
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The identification of the original paste and temper minerals present in ceramicware fragments can often be useful in determining if the fragments are indigenous to the area or whether they represent tradeware. To date, it has generally been believed that no certain means existed to identify the mineral constitutents once they were destroyed in the original kiln-firing operation. A new technique is described that permits the investigator to often identify both temper and the fine-grained paste materials as well. This method involves: (1) crushing the fragment to a fine powder; (2) heating the powder in a high temperature furnace to sufficient temperatures to cause the constituent ions present to recombine to form new, high temperature minerals; and (3) X-ray diffraction analysis to identify the new minerals. In many cases, identification of the resulting high temperature minerals will clearly indicate the composition of the original clay paste and temper. Examples are shown for the clay minerals kaolinite, montmorillonite and palygorskite. Diffractograms are also presented for comparison of ceramic fragments from Mexico and Alabama that contain the above minerals as original constituents.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 477 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, L. G., and Mason, B. 1959 Mineralogy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bradley, W. F. 1940 The structural scheme of attapulgite. A merican Mineralogist 25:405–410.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W., and Nakahira, M. 1958 Further consideration of the crystal structure of kaolinite. Mineral Magazine 31:781.Google Scholar
Caillere, S., and Henin, S. 1951 Palygorskite. In X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals, edited by Brown, G., pp. 343–353, Mineralogical Society of London.Google Scholar
Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J. 1962 Rock-forming minerals, Vol. 3: Sheet silicates. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S. B. 1936 Concerning the crystal structure of kaolinite and the composition of anauxite. Zeitschrift Kristalografie 95:247.Google Scholar
Isphording, W. C. 1973 Discussion of the occurrence and origin of sedimentary palygorskite-sepiolite deposits. Clays and Clay Minerals 21:391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, P. F., Hamilton, P. K., and Pill, R. J. 1950 Analytical data on reference clay materials. Preliminary report 7. Reference clay minerals. American Petroleum Institution Research Project 49. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Pauling, L. 1930 The structure of the chlorites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 16:578.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. M. 1951 Phase changes which occur on eating kaolin clays. In Rock-forming minerals, Vol. 3: Sheet silicates, edited by Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J., p. 205. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1956 Ceramics for the archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 609.Google Scholar
Slatkind, A. 1971 Etude petrographique comparee de certaines poteries anciennes dTsrael. Technion— Israel Institute of Technology Pre-print Google Scholar