Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:41:02.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Elemental Approach to the Distribution of Lead-Glazed Coarse Earthenware in the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lindsay Bloch
Lindsay Bloch*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB3120, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unlike many goods in the eighteenth century, which were wholly imported, utilitarian coarse earthenwares were also produced locally within the American colonies. In the Chesapeake region, it has been suggested that these local wares were primarily reserved for those unable to directly participate in the transatlantic credit economy fostered by the tobacco consignment system. Rather than relying on ambiguous visual attributes to identify these wares, this study utilized elemental analysis via LA-ICP-MS. Coarse earthenwares from domestic plantation contexts of varying social status were assigned to production zones based on shared elemental composition with a reference dataset. This reference dataset incorporated sherds from historic earthenware production sites across the mid-Atlantic and in Great Britain, representing 12 geologically distinct production zones. The results emphasize the diversity of coarse earthenware sources that Chesapeake residents accessed, both local and imported. There was a steady decrease in the use of imported wares in favor of domestically made products over time. There were no sharp differences among plantation households of different statuses, suggesting that these everyday wares were equally accessible to all, perhaps via plantation provisioning strategies. The omnipresence of local wares is evidence for the pragmatic and political strengths of local production.

A diferencia de muchos objetos del siglo XVIII, que fueron totalmente importados, también se produjeron cerámicas utilitarias de manera local dentro de las colonias americanas. En la región de Chesapeake, se sugiere que estos objetos de producción local estaban reservados principalmente para aquellos que no podían participar directamente en la economía de crédito transatlántico fomentado por el sistema de consignación de tabaco. En lugar de depender de las características visuales ambiguas para la identificación de este tipo de cerámicas, en este estudio se utilizó el análisis elemental LA-ICP-MS. El conjunto de datos incorpora muestras de sitios históricos de manufactura cerámica de la regiones del Atlántico Medio y Gran Bretaña, lo que representa doce zonas de producción geológicamente distintas. Cerámicas utilitarias de contextos domésticos de plantaciones (ca. 1690–1830), de diferentes estatus social, fueron asignados a estas zonas de producción de acuerdo a la composición elemental similar. Los resultados demuestran la diversidad de fuentes de estas cerámicas, tanto locales como importadas, a las que los residentes de Chesapeake podían acceder. A través del tiempo, hubo una disminución constante en el uso de las mercancías importadas a favor de los productos fabricados localmente. No se observaron grandes diferencias entre las unidades domésticas de las plantaciones de estatus sociales diferentes, lo que sugiere que estas mercancías cotidianas eran igualmente disponibles y utilizados por todos, tal vez siendo una de las estrategias de aprovisionamiento de las plantaciones. La omnipresència de cerámicas locales es evidencia de la fortaleza pragmática de las políticas de producción local.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 81 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 231 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, Nesta 2004 Finding the Space between Spatial Boundaries and Social Dynamics: The Archaeology of Nested Households. In Household Chores and Household Choices: Theorizing the Domestic Sphere in Historical Archaeology, edited by Kerri S. Barile and Jamie C. Brandon, pp. 109–120. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 2008 Social Change and the Evolution of Ceramic Production and Distribution in a Maya Community. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Aultman, Jennifer, Grillo, Kate, Bon-Harper, Nick, and Galle, Jillian 2014 DAACS Cataloging Manual: Ceramics. Electronic document, http://www.daacs.org/about-the-database/daacs-cataloging-manual/, accessed November 3,2014.Google Scholar
Barka, Norman F. 2004 Archaeology of a Colonial Pottery Factory: The Kilns and Ceramics of the “Poor Potter” of Yorktown. Ceramics in America 2004:15–47.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Mary Lee, Neff, Hector, and McAnany, Patricia A. 2000 Differentiation of Clay Resources on a Limestone Plain: The Analysis of Clay Utilization during the Maya Formative at K’axob Belize. Geoarchaeology 15:95–133.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William T. 1946 Credit, Bills, and Bookkeeping in a Simple Economy. The Accounting Review 21:154–166.Google Scholar
Beck, Margaret E., and Neff, Hector 2007 Hohokam and Patayan Interaction in Southwestern Arizona: Evidence from Ceramic Compositional Analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alison K. 2000 Conspicuous Production: Agricultural and Domestic Material Culture in Virginia, 1700–1900. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Bishop, Ronald L., Rands, Robert L., Holley, George R. 1982 Ceramic Compositional Analysis in Archaeological Perspective. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 5:275–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Lindsay 2011 An Archaeological Study of Common Coarse Earthenware in the Eighteenth- Century Chesapeake. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bloch, Lindsay 2015 Made in America? Ceramics, Credit, and Exchange on Chesapeake Plantations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bollwerk, Elizabeth Anne 2012 Seeing What Smoking Pipes Signal(ed): An Examination of Late Woodland and Early Contact Period (A.D. 900–1665) Native Social Dynamics in the Middle Atlantic. PhD. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Bower, Beth A. 1985 The Pottery-Making Trade in Colonial Philadelphia: The Growth of an Early Urban Industry. In Domestic Pottery of the Northeastern United States, edited by Susan Peabody Turnbaugh, pp. 133–152. Studies in Historical Archaeology, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
Breen, T. H. 2001 Tobacco Culture: The Mentality of the Great Tidewater Planters on the Eve of Revolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Breen, T. H. 2004 The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carson, Cary 2003 Consumption. In A Companion to Early America. edited by D. Vickers, pp. 334–365. Blackwell Publishing, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Ethan E., and Neff, Hector 2006 Investigating Compositional Diversity Among Fijian Ceramics with Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): Implications for Interaction Studies on Geologically Similar Islands. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:378–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comstock, H. E. 1994 The Pottery of the Shenandoah Valley Region. The Museum of Early Southern Decorative Arts. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Deetz, James 1996 In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life. Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
Earle, Carville V. 1975 The Evolution of a Tidewater Settlement System: All Hallow’s Parish, Maryland, 1650–1783. University of Chicago Department of Geography Research Paper No. 170. Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Eckert, Suzanne L., and James, William D. 2011 Investigating the Production and Distribution of Plain Ware Pottery in the Samoan Archipelago with Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2155–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Founders Online 2015 National Archives. Electronic document, http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-04-02-0412, accessed February 1,2015.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin 1837 Causes of the American Discontents before 1768. Reprinted. In The Works of Benjamin Franklin, vol. 4, edited by Jared Sparks, pp. 242–255. Hilliard Gray, Boston. Originally published as pamphlet, 1768.Google Scholar
Galle, Jillian E. 2010 Costly Signaling and Gendered Social Strategies among Slaves in the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake: An Archaeological Perspective. American Antiquity 75:19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golitko, Mark, and Terrell, John Edward 2012 Mapping Prehistoric Social Fields on the Sepik Coast of Papua New Guinea: Ceramic Compositional Analysis using Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 39:3568–3580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratuze, Bernard 1999 Obsidian Characterization by LA-ICP-MS and Its Application to Prehistoric Trade in the Mediterranean and the Near East: Sources and Distribution of Obsidian within the Aegean and Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Barbara J. 1997 Slavery and Consumerism: A Case Study from Central Virginia. African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter 4(2):1–7. Electronic document, http://scholarworks.umass.edu/adan/vol4/iss2/1, accessed February 28, 2015.Google Scholar
Honaker, James, King, Gary, and Blackwell, Matthew 2011 Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data. Journal of Statistical Software 45(7):1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, James P. 1979 Servant Emigration to the Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century. In The Chesapeake in the Seventeenth Century: Essays in Anglo-American Society, edited by Thad W. Tate and David L. Ammerman, pp. 51–95. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Huberty, Carl J., and Olejnik, Stephen 2006 Applied MANOVA and Discriminant Analysis, Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas 1987 Thomas Jefferson’s Farm Book, with Commentary and Relevant Extracts from Other Writings, edited by E. M. Betts. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Joyce, Arthur A., Neff, Hector, Thieme, Mary S., Winter, Marcus, Michael Elam, I., and Workinger, Andrew 2006 Ceramic Production and Exchange in Late/Terminal Formative Period, Oaxaca. Latin American Antiquity 17:579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, William M., and Chappell, Edward A. 1974 Excavation of a Seventeenth Century Pottery Kiln at Glebe Harbor, Westmoreland County, Virginia. Historical Archaeology 8:53–63.Google Scholar
Kovarovic, Kris, Aiello, Leslie C., Cardini, Andrea, and Lockwood, Charles A. 2011 Discriminant Function Analyses in Archaeology: Are Classification Rates Too Good to Be True? Journal of Archaeological Science 38:3006–3018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Robert D., and Sempowski, Martha L. 2001 A New Approach to Dating the League of the Iroquois. American Antiquity 66:301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulikoff, Allan 2000 From British Peasants to Colonial American Farmers. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
McCartney, Martha W., and Ayres, Edward 2004 Yorktown’s “Poor Potter”: A Man Wise Beyond Discretion. Ceramics in America 2004:48–59.Google Scholar
Magid, Barbara H. 1995 An Archaeological Perspective on Alexandria’s Pottery Tradition. Journal of Early Southern Decorative Arts 21(2):41–82,Google Scholar
Martin, Ann Smart 2008 Buying into the World of Goods: Early Consumers in Backcountry Virginia. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Metz, John 1999 Industrial Transition and the Rise of a “Creole” Society in the Chesapeake. In Historical Archaeology, Identity Formation, and the Interpretation of Ethnicity, edited by Maria Franklin and Garrett Fesler, pp. 11–30. Colonial Williamsburg Research Publications. Dietz Press, Richmond, Virginia.Google Scholar
Miller, George L. 1984 Marketing Ceramics in North America: An Introduction. Winterthur Portfolio 19(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, Hans 2001 Provenance Determination of Pottery by Trace Element Analysis: Problems, Solutions, and Applications. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247:657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monette, Yves, Richer-LaFleche, Marc, Moussette, Marcel, and Dufournier, Daniel 2007 Compositional Analysis of Local Redwares: Characterizing the Pottery Productions of 16 Workshops Located in Southern Quebec Dating from the Late 17th to Late 19th Century. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Phillip D. 1998 Slave Counterpoint: Black Culture in the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake and Lowcountry. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Myers, Susan H. 1984a Marketing American Pottery: Maulden Perine in Baltimore. Winterthur Portfolio 19:51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Susan H. 1984b The Business of Potting, 1780–1840. In The Craftsman in Early America, edited by Ian M. G. Quimby, pp. 190–233. The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum. W.W. Norton & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector 2003 Analysis of Mesoamerican Plumbate Pottery Surfaces by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled-Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Journal of Archaeological Science 30:21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niziolek, Lisa C. 2011 Ceramic Production and Craft Specialization in the Prehispanic Philippines, A.D. 500 to 1600. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
NoÎl Hume, Ivor 1969 A Guide to the Artifacts of Colonial America. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Owen, Victor, and Greenough, John D. 2010 Mineralogical and Geochemical Characterization of Eighteenth-Century Moravian Pottery from North Carolina. Ceramics in America 2010:168–187.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. Mark, and Heron, Carl 2008 Archaeological Chemistry. 2nd ed. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2014 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Electronic document, http://www.R-project.org/, accessed September 1,2015.Google Scholar
Randolph, Mary 1838 The Virginia Housewife, or, Methodical Cook. Plaskitt and Cugle, Baltimore. Electronic document, http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/cookbooks/html/books/book_10.cfm, accessed March 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Russ, Kurt C. 1995 Exploring Western Virginia Potteries. The Journal of Early Southern Decorative Arts 21(2):98–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, Jean B., and Elliott Russo, J. 2012 Planting an Empire: The Early Chesapeake in British North America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Scarlett, Timothy James, Speakman, Robert J., and Glascock, Michael D. 2007 Pottery in the Mormon Economy: An Historical, Archaeological, and Archaeometric Study. Historical Archaeology 41(4):72–97.Google Scholar
Shammas, Carole 1982 Consumer Behavior in Colonial America. Social Science History 6:67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola, Golitko, Mark, Ryan Williams, P., and Dussubieux, Laure 2009 Ceramic Production during the Middle Horizon: Wari and Tiwanaku Clay Procurement in the Moquegua Valley, Peru. Geoarchaeology 24:792–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, James F., and Williamson, Samuel H. 1972 The Coastal Trade of the British North American Colonies, 1768–1772. The Journal of Economic History 32:783–810.Google Scholar
Skibo, James, and Schiffer, Michael. B. 2008 People and Things: A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Russell K, James Blackman, M., and Bishop, Ronald L. 2014 Ceramic Production in Early Hispanic California: Craft, Economy, and Trade on the Frontier of New Spain. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael S., Loftfield, Thomas C., and Paulsson, Fiona M. 1995 Preliminary Investigation of Orange Micaceous Earthenware from the Early Colonial Period Charles Towne Colony, Cape Fear River, North Carolina. In Material Issues in Art and Archaeology IV, pp. 589–595.Google Scholar
Soltow, James H. 1959 Scottish Traders in Virginia, 1750–1775. Economic History Review, New Series 12(1):83–98.Google Scholar
Speakman, Robert J., and Neff, Hector 2005 The Application of Laser Ablation-ICP-MS to the Study of Archaeological Materials-An Introduction. In Laser Ablation ICP-MS in Archaeological Research, edited by Robert. J. Speakman and Hector Neff, pp. 1–16. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Staffordshire County Council Education Committee 1981 Staffordshire Pottery Industry. Local History Source Book G. 4.Google Scholar
Steadman, Laura 2008 Uncovering the Origins of Abbott Zone Incised Ware. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 24:79–86.Google Scholar
Steen, Carl 1990 The Inter-Colonial Trade of Domestic Earthenware and the Development of an American Social Identity. Volumes in Historical Archaeology IX. University of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
Stoner, Wesley D., and Glascock, Michael D. 2012 The Forest or the Trees? Behavioral and Methodological Considerations for Geochemical Characterization of Heavily-Tempered Ceramic Pastes Using NAA and LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Archaeological Science 39:2668–2683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straube, Beverly A. 1995 The Colonial Potters of Tidewater Virginia. Journal of Early Southern Decorative Arts 26(2):1–40.Google Scholar
Wallis, Neill J., and Kamenov, George D. 2013 Challenges in the Analysis of Heterogeneous Pottery by LA-ICP-MS: A Comparison with INAA. Archaeometry 55:893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S. 1988 Community Networks in the Early Chesapeake. In Colonial Chesapeake Society, edited by Lois Green Carr, Philip D. Morgan, and Jean B. Russo, pp. 200–241. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Walsh, Lorena S. 2010 Motives of Honor, Pleasure, and Profit: Plantation Management in the Colonial Chesapeake, 1607–1763. Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Weigand, Phil C., Harbottle, Garman, and Sayre, Edward V. 1977 Turquoise Sources and Source Analysis: Mesoamerica and the Southwestern U.S.A. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Timothy K. Earle and Jonathon E. Ericson, pp. 15–34. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yentsch, Anne 1991 Engendering Visible and Invisible Ceramic Artifacts, Especially Dairy Vessels. Historical Archaeology 25(4):132–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bloch Supplementary Material

Table S1

Download Bloch Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 2.3 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Bloch Supplementary Material

Table S2

Download Bloch Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 27.6 KB