Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:08:30.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial grammar implementation: From theory to useable software

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Alison McKay ,
Scott Chase ,
Kristina Shea  and
Hau Hing Chau
Alison McKay*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Scott Chase
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture, Design, and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Kristina Shea
Affiliation:
Virtual Product Development Group, Institute of Product Development, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
Hau Hing Chau
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
*
Reprint requests to: Alison McKay, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Currently available computer-aided design tools provide strong support for the later stages of product development processes where the structure and shape of the design have been fixed. Support for earlier stages of product development, when both the structure and shape of the design are still fluid, demands conceptual design tools that support designers' ways of thinking and working, and enhance creativity, for example, by offering design alternatives, difficult or not, possible without the use of such tools. The potential of spatial grammars as a technology to support such design tools has been demonstrated through experimental research prototypes since the 1970s. In this paper, we provide a review of recent spatial grammar implementations, which were presented in the Design Computing and Cognition 2010 workshop on which this paper is based, in the light of requirements for conceptual design tools and identify future research directions in both research and design education.

Keywords

Computational Design SynthesisImplementationSpatial Grammar
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 26 , Issue 2: Design Computing and Cognition (DCC'10) , May 2012 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agarwal, M., & Cagan, J. (1998). A blend of different tastes: the language of coffee makers. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alber, R., & Rudolph, S. (2003). “43”—A generic approach for engineering design grammars. AAAI Technical Report SS-03-02, Computational synthesis. Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Carlson, C. (1993). Grammatical programming: an algebraic approach to the description of design spaces. PhD Thesis. Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Architecture.Google Scholar
Chase, S.C. (2002). A model for user interaction in grammar-based design systems. Automation in Construction 11, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, S.C. (2010). Shape grammar implementations: the last 35 years. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/documents/DCC2010grammarsworkshop-Chase-revised.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chau, H.H., Chen, X.J., McKay, A., & de Pennington, A. (2004). Evaluation of a 3D shape grammar implementation. In Design Computing and Cognition '04: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 357–376. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, R.C., Duarte, J.P., & Leitão, A.M. (2010). MALAG: a discursive grammar interpreter for the online generation of mass customized housing. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/DCC-10-SG-Implementation-Workshop-Agenda.htmGoogle Scholar
DCC10-grammars. (2010). Shape grammar implementation: from theory to useable software. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/DCC10-SG-Implementation-Workshop.htmGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J.P. (2005). A discursive grammar for customizing mass housing: the case of Siza's houses at Malagueira. Automation in Construction 14(2), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertelt, C., & Shea, K. (2010). Shape grammar implementation for machining planning. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/DCC-10-SG-Implementation-Workshop-Agenda.htmGoogle Scholar
Gips, J. (1999). Computer implementation of shape grammars. Proc. Workshop on Shape Computation, MIT. Accessed at http://www.shapegrammar.org/implement.pdfGoogle Scholar
Heisserman, J. (1991). Generative geometric design and boundary solid grammars. PhD Thesis. Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Heisserman, J. (1994). Generative geometric design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 14, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisserman, J., Mattikalli, R., & Callahan, S. (2004). A grammatical approach to design generation and its application to aircraft systems. Proc. Generative CAD Systems Symp. ‘04, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Hoisl, F., & Shea, K. (2011). An interactive, visual approach to developing and applying parametric 3-D spatial grammars. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 25, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iordanova, I., & Mueller, V. (2010). Conceptual computational design tools. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www.grcao.umontreal.ca/DCC2010-WS/WS2010-concept-compu-tools.htmGoogle Scholar
ISO. (1994). ISO10303-1: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Jowers, I. (2006). Computation with curved shapes: towards freeform shape generation in design. PhD Thesis. Open University.Google Scholar
Jowers, I., & Earl, C.F. (2010). QI—a shape grammar interpreter for curved shapes. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/DCC-10-SG-Implementation-Workshop-Agenda.htmGoogle Scholar
Jowers, I., Hogg, D.C., McKay, A., Chau, H.H., & de Pennington, A. (2010). Shape detection with vision: implementing shape grammars in conceptual design. Research in Engineering Design 21(4), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, R., & Stouffs, R. (1993). Spatial grammars: motivation, comparison, and new results. CAAD Futures ‘93: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Li, A.I.-K., Chau, H.H., Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2009). A prototype system for developing two- and three-dimensional shape grammars. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, pp. 717–726. Yunlin, Taiwan: CAADRIA.Google Scholar
McKay, A., Chase, S.C., Garner, S.W., Jowers, I., Prats, M., Hogg, D.C., Chau, H.H., de Pennington, A., Earl, C.F., & Lim, S. (2009). Design synthesis and shape generation. In Designing for the 21st Century: Interdisciplinary Methods and Findings (Inns, T., Ed.), pp. 304–321. Aldershot: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
Pugliese, M., & Cagan, J. (2001). Capturing a rebel: modeling the Harley–Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar. Research in Engineering Design 13, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Requicha, A.A.G., & Voelcker, H.B. (1983). Solid modeling: current status and research directions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 3, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K., Ertelt, C., Gmeiner, T., & Ameri, F. (2010). Design-to-fabrication automation for the cognitive machine shop. Advanced Engineering Informatics 24, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiny, G. (1991). The algebras of design. Research in Engineering Design 2, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapia, M. (1999). A visual implementation of a shape grammar system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trescak, T., Esteva, M., & Rodriguez, I. (2010). Shape grammar interpreter for rectilinear forms. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, Stuttgart, July 11, 2010. Accessed at http://www2.mech-eng.leeds.ac.uk/users/men6am/DCC-10-SG-Implementation-Workshop-Agenda.htmGoogle Scholar