Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:28:33.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socharis: The instantiation of a strategy for conceptual manufacturing planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2000

OLEG LUKIBANOV
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
ILIANA MARTINEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
TIMOTHY J. LENZ
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
JAMES K. McDOWELL
Affiliation:
Mad Dog Composites, Inc.
CLARK RADCLIFFE
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
JON STICKLEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

Abstract

Considering manufacturing expertise during the early stages of design can be of great benefit. Such information can greatly improve not only the quality of a design, but it can also ensure the generation of an easily manufactured design. This, in turn, can lower the final cost of the designed product. By evaluating how easily an evolving conceptual design can be made, potential hazards can be avoided before any detailed design efforts commence. The conceptual manufacturing planning requisite to such an evaluation is the focus of this paper. A domain-independent strategy for conceptual manufacturing planning is presented. A task-structure analysis of this strategy shows its domain independence. A specific implementation of this strategy for polymer composites manufacturing planning (Socharis) is discussed. The high-level implementation details of Socharis are presented as instantiations of the conceptual manufacturing planning strategy. Finally, the validity of the planning strategy and the utility of Socharis are assessed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)