Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:43:59.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of Hofstede's cultural dimensions in the design of user interface: the case of Arabic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

Ahmed Alsswey Open the ORCID record for Ahmed Alsswey [Opens in a new window]  and
Hosam Al-Samarraie Open the ORCID record for Hosam Al-Samarraie [Opens in a new window]
Ahmed Alsswey*
Affiliation:
School of Architecture and Design, Department of Multimedia Technology, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Hosam Al-Samarraie
Affiliation:
School of Media and Performing Arts, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Ahmed Alsswey, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A user interface (UI) design that meets the preferences, differences, and needs of the group of users can potentially increase the usability of a system. Users, in general, feel more familiar with the context that reflects their cultural values and practices. The Arabic culture plays a significant role in how Arab users interact and communicate with technologies. The customs, artifacts, and traditions of the Arab world are different in nature from the Western cultures. Thus, it is essential to consider these differences when designing the UI prototype. This study investigated the role of certain cultural preferences in the design of UI for Arab users. A think-aloud approach and Hofstede's cultural dimensions were used on 23 Arab users to generate the necessary design guidelines for the UI of mobile health application. Then, 78 participants were recruited to evaluate the proposed UI design. The usability results showed high satisfaction among Arab users about the role of culture in the design of the UI. Findings from this study can be used by designers and developers to aid their design of UI for group-specific cultural preferences and values.

Keywords

Arab userscultureHCIHofstede dimensionsmobile UI design
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 116 - 127
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abokhodair, N and Vieweg, S (2016) Privacy & social media in the context of the Arab Gulf. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 672–683.Google Scholar
Ackerman, S (2002) Mapping user interface design to culture dimensions. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Internationalisation of Products and Systems.Google Scholar
Al-Badi, A (2009) Designing usable localised websites: differences between western and Arab cultures. IBIMA Business Review 2, 9–19.Google Scholar
Alostath, JM, Almoumen, S and Alostath, AB (2009) Identifying and measuring cultural differences in cross-cultural user-interface design. International Conference on Internationalization, Design and Global Development, pp. 3–12, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Al-Samarraie, H, Sarsam, SM and Guesgen, H (2016) Predicting user preferences of environment design: a perceptual mechanism of user interface customisation. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, 644–653.Google Scholar
Al-Samarraie, H, Eldenfria, A, Dodoo, JE, Alzahrani, AI and Alalwan, N (2019 a) Packaging design elements and consumers’ decision to buy from the Web: a cause and effect decision-making model. Color Research & Application 44, 993–1005.Google Scholar
Al-Samarraie, H, Eldenfria, A, Price, ML, Zaqout, F and Fauzy, WM (2019 b) Effects of map design characteristics on users’ search performance and cognitive load. The Electronic Library 37, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Samarraie, H, Eldenfria, A, Zaqout, F and Price, ML (2019 c) How reading in single- and multiple-column types influence our cognitive load: an EEG study. The Electronic Library 37, 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALsswey, A and Naufal, I, Bervell, B (2018 a) Investigating the acceptance of mobile health application user interface cultural-based design to assist Arab elderly users. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 9, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsswey, A, Umar, I and Al-Samarraie, H (2018 b) Towards mobile design guidelines-based cultural values for elderly Arabic users. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 10, 964–977.Google Scholar
Alsswey, AH, Al-Samarraie, H, El-Qirem, FA, Alzahrani, AI and Alfarraj, O (2020) Culture in the design of mHealth UI: an effort to increase acceptance among culturally specific groups. Electronic Library 38, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awajan, NW and Dweik, B (2010) Factors that Enhance English Language Teachers’ Motivation in Jordanian Secondary Public Schools (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East University.Google Scholar
Azman, A, Silva, JLD, Samah, BA, Man, N and Shaffril, HAM (2013) Relationship between attitude, knowledge, and support towards the acceptance of sustainable agriculture among contract farmers in Malaysia. Asian Social Science 9, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, W and Badre, A (1998) Culturability: the merging of culture and usability. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Benaida, M (2014). Developing Arabic Usability Guidelines for E-Learning Websites in Higher Education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Salford.Google Scholar
Burton-Jones, A and Hubona, GS (2005) Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 36, 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, E (2005) Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university Web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 239–273.Google Scholar
Chadwick-Dias, A, McNulty, M and Tullis, T (2002) Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped 73-74, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charters, E (2003) The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal 12, 12–27.Google Scholar
Chin, JP, Diehl, VA and Norman, KL (1988) Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
Cyr, D, Head, M and Larios, H (2010) Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: a multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaja, SJ, Rogers, WA, Fisk, AD, Charness, N and Sharit, J (2009) Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Darroch, I, Goodman, J, Brewster, S and Gray, P (2005) The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers. In IFIP conference on human-computer interaction, September. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 253–266.Google Scholar
Dormann, C and Chisalita, C (2002) Cultural values in web site design. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics ECCE11.Google Scholar
Ericsson, KA and Simon, HA (1998) How to study thinking in everyday life: contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity 5, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, V and Day, D (1997) The role of culture in interface acceptance. Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’97, pp. 260–267. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Faghih, B, Azadehfar, D, Reza, M and Katebi, P (2014) User interface design for e-learning software. TheInternational Journal of Soft Computing and Software Engineering 3, 786–794.Google Scholar
Farage, MA, Miller, KW, Ajayi, F and Hutchins, D (2012) Design principles to accommodate older adults. Global Journal of Health Science 4, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisk, AD, Rogers, WA, Charness, N, Czaja, SJ and Sharit, J (2009) Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fulk, RD (2008) English as a Germanic language. In Momma, H and Matto, M (eds), Companion to the History of the English Language. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 142–149.Google Scholar
Gefen, D, Karahanna, E and Straub, DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27, 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geissler, GL (2001) Building customer relationships online: the web site designers’ perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing 18, 488–502.Google Scholar
Hall, M (1976) The Theory of Groups, vol. 288. New York: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Hampden-Turner, C and Trompenaars, A (1993) The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Chichester, UK: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hasan, AA, Al-Sammerai, NSM and Kadir, FABA (2011) How colours are semantically construed in the Arabic and English culture: a comparative study. English Language Teaching 4, 206–213.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G (1980) Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization 10, 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Horton, W (1991) Illustrating Computer Documentation: The Art of Presenting Information Graphically on Paper and Online. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Hudson, R and Hall, PA (1997) Software Without Frontiers: A Multi-Platform, Multi-Cultural, Multi-National Approach. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Islam, MN and Bouwman, H (2016) Towards user–intuitive web interface sign design and evaluation: a semiotic framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 86, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M and Marsden, G (2006) Mobile Interaction Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Jones, M and Marsden, G (2006) Mobile Interaction Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kalliny, M and Gentry, L (2007) Cultural values reflected in Arab and American television advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 29, 15–32.Google Scholar
Khaddam, I and Vanderdonckt, J (2014) Towards a culture-adaptable user-interface architecture. Romanian Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7, 161–194.Google Scholar
Khanum, MA, Fatima, S and Chaurasia, MA (2012) Arabic interface analysis based on cultural markers. International Journal of Computer Science Issues 9, 255–262.Google Scholar
Kim, JH and Lee, KP (2005) Cultural difference and mobile phone interface design: icon recognition according to level of abstraction. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, pp. 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landell, K (1997) Management by Menu. London: Wiley and Sons Inco.Google Scholar
Long, J (2017) The New Munsell Student Color Set. NJ: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Marcus, A (2000) International and intercultural user interfaces. In Stephanidis, C (ed.), User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, A and Hamoodi, S (2009) The impact of culture on the design of Arabic websites. International Conference on Internationalization, Design and Global Development, pp. 386–394. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, A and Krishnamurthi, N (2009) Cross-cultural analysis of social network services in Japan, Korea, and the USA. International Conference on Internationalization, Design and Global Development, pp. 59–68. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Marcus, A, Baumgartner, V-J and Chen, E (2005) User interface design and culture. Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology 3, 51–78.Google Scholar
Medhi, I, Patnaik, S, Brunskill, E, Gautama, SN, Thies, W and Toyama, K (2011) Designing mobile interfaces for novice and low-literacy users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, E and Bernier, I (2010). Standardizing or Adapting the Marketing Mix Across Culture: A Case Study: Agatha. (Unpublished master thesis). Halmstad School of Business and Marketing.Google Scholar
Mirri, S, Roccetti, M and Salomoni, P (2018) Collaborative design of software applications: the role of users. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 8, 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushtaha, A and De Troyer, O (2007) Cross-cultural understanding of content and interface in the context of e-learning systems. International Conference on Usability and Internationalization, pp. 164–173. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Mushtaha, A and De Troyer, O (2012) A pyramid of cultural markers for guiding cultural-centered localized website design. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology: CATaC 2012, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
Obeidat, BY, Shannak, RO, Masa'deh, R and Al-Jarrah, I (2012) Toward better understanding for Arabian culture: implications based on Hofstede's cultural model. European Journal of Social Sciences 28, 512–522.Google Scholar
Pearson, JM and Pearson, AM (2008) An exploratory study into determining the relative importance of key criteria in web usability: a multi-criteria approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems 48, 115–127.Google Scholar
Pihie, ZAL and Bagheri, A (2012) An exploratory study of entrepreneurial attributes among Malaysian university students. Life Science Journal 9, 2358–2365.Google Scholar
Plass, JL (1998) Design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software: a cognitive approach. Language Learning & Technology 2, 40–53.Google Scholar
Proctor, RW and Vu, K-PL (2006) Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richer, J and Drury, JL (2006) A video game-based framework for analyzing human-robot interaction: characterizing interface design in real-time interactive multimedia applications. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigou, M, Sirmakessis, S, Ventura, R, Fernández, A, Antonopoulos, CP and Voros, N (2019) Designing user interfaces for the elderly. RADIO – Robots in Assisted Living. Cham: Springer, pp. 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J and Gao, J (2016) Overcoming the language barrier in mobile user interface design: A case study on a mobile health app. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04693.Google Scholar
Saari, HA and Mat Rashid, A (2013) Competency level of employability skills among the apprentices of the national dual training system: a comparative analysis of industry perception by company status. International Journal of Education and Research 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
Saidin, N, Singh, D and Drus, ZAM (2017) Culture centered design: reviews on cultural factors influencing interface design elements. Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews 3, 54–74.Google Scholar
Sarsam, SM and Al-Samarraie, H (2018) Towards incorporating personality into the design of an interface: a method for facilitating users’ interaction with the display. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahin, AI and Wright, PL (2004) Leadership in the context of culture: an Egyptian perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 25, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, WR and Craig, AB (2018) Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Strizver, I (2014) Type Rules, Enhanced Edition: The Designer's Guide to Professional Typography. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Tolba, AH and Mourad, M (2011) Individual and cultural factors affecting diffusion of innovation. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies 5, 1–17.Google Scholar
van Griethuijsen, RA, van Eijck, MW, Haste, H, den Brok, PJ, Skinner, NC, Mansour, N and BouJaoude, S (2015) Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education 45, 581–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, V and Morris, MG (2000) Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 24, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, M, Vukovic’, V and Marsden, G (2002) 'Visual literacy' as challenge to the internationalisation of interfaces: a study of South African student web users. CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 530–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weay, AL, Abdullah, SH, Masood, M and Muniandy, B (2015) Design issues and challenges for web-based history learning system for adolescents in Malaysia. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific HCI and UX Design Symposium, pp. 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimolmas, R (2013) A Survey Study of Motivation in English Language Learning of First Year Undergraduate Students at Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology (SIIT), Thammasat University. Bangkok, Thailand: Language Institute, Thammasat University.Google Scholar