Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:18:49.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research on encouraging sketching in engineering design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2012

Linda C. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Noe Vargas Hernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
Ashley L. Ruocco
Affiliation:
Department of Energy, Germantown, Maryland, USA
*
Reprint requests to: Linda Schmidt, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-3035, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The value of sketching in engineering design has been widely documented. This paper reviews trends in recent studies on sketching in engineering design and focuses on the encouragement of sketching. The authors present three experimental studies on sketching that look at (1) sketching assignments and their motivation, (2) the impact of a sketching lesson, and (3) the use of Smartpen technology to record sketching; overall these studies address the research question: Can sketching frequency be influenced in engineering education? Influencing sketching frequency is accomplished through motivation, learning, and use of technology for sketching, respectively. Results indicate that these three elements contribute to the encouragement of sketching in engineering design.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bilda, Z., & Gero, J. (2008). Idea development can occur using imagery only. Design Computing and Cognition ‘08 (Gero, J.S., & Goel, A.K., Eds.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bilda, Z., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (2006). To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies 27(5), 587613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M.A. (2011). Sketching, drafting, & developing engineering visualization skills. Proc. 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition, AC 2011-2023, Vancouver, June 2629.Google Scholar
deBono, E. (1983). The direct teaching of thinking as a skill. Phi Delta Kappan 64(10), 6.Google Scholar
Do, E.Y.-L. (2002). Drawing marks, acts, and reacts, toward a computational sketching interface for architectural design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16(3), 149171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, E. (1992), Engineering and the Mind's Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grenier, A. (2008). Conceptual understanding and the use of hand-sketching in mechanical engineering design. University of Maryland, College Park. Accessed at http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/8309Google Scholar
Kivett, H.A. (1998). Free-hand sketching: a lost art? Journal of Professional Issues Engineering Education Practice 124(3), 6064.Google Scholar
Lane, D., & Seery, N. (2010). Freehand sketching as a catalyst for developing concept driven competencies. Proc. 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition, AC 2010-1212, Louisville, KY, June 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J.M., & Weightman, D. (2011). Engineering and industrial design education collaboration, Proc. 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition, AC 2011-882, Vancouver, June 2629.Google Scholar
Leclerq, P., & Juchmes, R. (2002). The absent interface in design engineering. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16, 219227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, D. (2007). Seeing mechanical. Mechanical Engineering (n.v.), 3536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGown, A., Green, G., & Rodgers, P. (1998). Visible ideas: information patterns of conceptual sketch Activity. Design Studies 19(4), 431453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosborg, S., Adams, R., Kim, R., Atman, C.J., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: an expert study of advanced practicing professionals. Proc. 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition, Portland, OR, June 1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehlberg, L., & Agogino, A. (2011). Undergraduate conceptions of the engineering design process: assessing the impact of a human-centered design course. Proc. 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper No. AC 2011-882, Vancouver, June 2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehlberg, L., Lau, K., & Agogino, A. (2009). Tangible interactions in a digital age: medium and graphic visualizations in design journals. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23, 227249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prats, M., Earl, C., Garner, S., & Jowers, I. (2006). Shape exploration of designs in a style: towards generation of product designs. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 20(3), 201215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, B., Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D. (2007). Creativity and the use of CAD tools: lessons for engineering design education from industry. Journal of Mechanical Design 129, 753760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, A.T. (2005). Graphical communication using hand-drawn sketches in civil engineering. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 131(4), 238246.Google Scholar
Ruocco, A., Westmoreland, S., & Schmidt, L. (2009). Sketching in design: easily influencing behavior. Proc. ASME 2009 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE 2009, Paper No. DETC2009-87503, San Diego, CA, August 30–September 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Schütze, M., Sachse, P., & Römer, A. (2003). Support value of sketching in the design process. Research in Engineering Design 14, 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, J., Vargas Hernandez, H., & Smith, S. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24(2), 111134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In Tools for Innovation (Markman, A., Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Suwa, M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Chris Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Klingner, J., Daniel, M., Lee, P., & Haymaker, J. (2003). Sketches for design and design of sketches. In Human Behaviour in Design: Individuals, Teams, Tools (Lindemann, U., Ed.), pp. 7986. New York: Springer–Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer & Graphics 14(2), 263274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26(2), 101122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, N., Kremer, G.E., Linsey, J., & Schmidt, L. (2010). Systematic ideation curriculum effectiveness investigation & deployment to enhance design learning. Proc. 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition, AC 2010-1812, Louisville, KY, June 2023.Google Scholar
Westmoreland, S., Ruocco, A., & Schmidt, L. (2011). Analysis of capstone design reports: Visual representations, Journal of Mechanical Design 133(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, R.F., & Burrow, A.L. (2006). Whither design space. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 20, 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M C. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 20(11), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M. C, and Cham, J. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 129, 476482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M.C. (2003). Concept generation and sketching: Correlations with design outcome. Proc. of ASME 2003 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48677, Chicago, September 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar