Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:52:02.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Product life cycle management approach for integration of engineering design and life cycle engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2016

Diana Penciuc ,
Julien Le Duigou ,
Joanna Daaboul ,
Flore Vallet  and
Benoît Eynard
Diana Penciuc
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemX, Palaiseau, France
Julien Le Duigou
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, Compiègne, France
Joanna Daaboul
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, Compiègne, France
Flore Vallet
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemX, Palaiseau, France Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, Compiègne, France Laboratoire Génie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris Saclay, Chatenay-Malabry, France
Benoît Eynard*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, Compiègne, France
*
Reprint requests to: Benoît Eynard, Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, UMR 7337 Roberval, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne Universités, CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Optimized lightweight manufacturing of parts is crucial for automotive and aeronautical industries in order to stay competitive and to reduce costs and fuel consumption. Hence, aluminum becomes an unquestionable material choice regarding these challenges. Nevertheless, using only virgin aluminum is not satisfactory because its extraction requires high use of energy and effort, and its manufacturing has high environmental impact. For these reasons, the use of recycled aluminum alloys is recommended considering their properties meet the expected technical and environmental added values. This requires complete reengineering of the classical life cycle of aluminum-based products and the collaboration practices in the global supply chain. The results from several interdependent disciplines all need to be taken into account for a global product/process optimization. Toward achieving this, a method for sustainability assessment integration into product life cycle management and a platform for life cycle simulation integrating environmental concerns are proposed in this paper. The platform may be used as a decision support system in the early product design phase by simulating the life cycle of a product (from material selection to production and recycling phases) and calculating its impact on the environment.

Keywords

Aluminum IndustryEngineering DesignLife Cycle EngineeringLightweight ProductProduct Life Cycle Management
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 30 , Special Issue 4: Engineering Design Informatics , November 2016 , pp. 379 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andriankaja, H., Vallet, F., Le Duigou, J., & Eynard, B. (2015). A method to ecodesign structural parts in the transport sector based on product life cycle management. Journal of Cleaner Production 94, 165–176.Google Scholar
Assouroko, I., Ducellier, G., Eynard, B., & Boutinaud, P. (2014). Knowledge management and reuse in collaborative product development—a semantic relationship management based approach. International Journal of Product Life cycle Management 7(1), 54–74.Google Scholar
Atzeni, E., & Salmi, A. (2012). Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 62(9–12), 1147–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkadi, F., Troussier, N., Eynard, B., & Bonjour, E. (2010). Collaboration based on product life cycles interoperability for extended enterprise. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 4(3), 169–179.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM—A Design Research Methodology. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouikni, N., Rivest, L., & Desrochers, A. (2008). A multiple views management system for concurrent engineering and PLM. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 16(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brissaud, D., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2001). Product models for life cycle. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 50(1), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F., et al. (2013). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design 45(2), 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, M.A. (2006). Life cycle assessment: Principles and practice, Report No. EPA/600/R-06/060. Washington, DC: EPA.Google Scholar
Daaboul, J., Le Duigou, J., Penciuc, D., & Eynard, B. (2014). Reverse logistics network design: a holistic life cycle approach. Journal of Remanufacturing 4(7), 1–15.Google Scholar
Demoly, F., Monticolo, D., Eynard, B., Rivest, L., & Gomes, S. (2010). Multiple viewpoint modelling framework enabling integrated product–process design. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 4(4), 269–280.Google Scholar
Diegel, O., Singamneni, S., Reay, S., & Withell, A. (2010). Tools for sustainable product design: additive manufacturing. Journal of Sustainable Development 3(3), 68–75.Google Scholar
Duflou, J.R., Tekkaya, A.E., Haase, M., Welo, T., Vanmeensel, K., Kellens, K., Dewulf, W., & Paraskevas, D., (2015). Environmental assessment of solid state recycling routes for aluminum alloys: can solid state processes significantly reduce the environmental impact of aluminum recycling? CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 64(1), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrene, M., Zwolinski, P., & Brissaud, D. (2013). An engineering platform to support a practical integrated eco-design methodology. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 62, 131–134.Google Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1990). BERA Dialogues: Vol. 2. Performance Indicators. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Främling, K., Holmström, J., Loukkola, J., Nyman, J., & Kaustell, A. (2013). Sustainable PLM through intelligent products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26(2), 789–799.Google Scholar
Hachani, S., Gzara, L., & Verjus, H. (2013). A service-oriented approach for flexible process support within enterprises: application on PLM systems. Enterprise Information Systems 7(1), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Aluminum Institute. (2009). Global aluminium recycling: a cornerstone of sustainable development. Accessed at http://www.world-aluminum.org/media/filer_public/2013/01/15/fl0000181.pdf in June 2015.Google Scholar
ISO14040. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. Geneva: International Standard Organisation. Accessed at http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=37456 in June 2015.Google Scholar
Jun, H.B., Kiritsis, D., & Xirouchakis, P. (2007). Research issues on closed-loop PLM. Computers in Industry 58(8–9), 855–868.Google Scholar
Kiritsis, D. (2011). Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things. Computer-Aided Design 43(5), 479–501.Google Scholar
Kozemjakin da Silva, M., Remy, S., & Reyes, T. (2015). On providing design process information to the environmental expert. Research in Engineering Design 26(4), 327–336.Google Scholar
Labuschagne, C., & Brent, A.C. (2005). Sustainable project life cycle management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Project Management 23(2), 159–168.Google Scholar
Le Duigou, J., Bernard, A., Perry, N., & Delplace, J.C. (2012). Generic PLM system for SMEs: application to an equipment manufacturer. International Journal Product Life Cycle Management 6(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
Lindhal, M. (2006). Engineering designers’ experience of design for environment methods and tools—requirement definitions from an interview study. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 487–496.Google Scholar
Lofthouse, V. (2006). Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1386–1395.Google Scholar
Luttrop, C., & Lagerstedt, J. (2006). Ecodesign and the ten golden rules: generic advise for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 14, 1396–1408.Google Scholar
Mathieux, F., Brissaud, D., Roucoules, L., & Lescuyer, L. (2007). Connecting CAD and PLM systems with ecodesign software: current experiences and futures opportunities. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design—ICED'07. Paris: Design Society.Google Scholar
Noël, F., & Roucoules, L. (2008). The PPO design model with respect to digital enterprise technologies among product life cycle. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 21(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach, 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pavković, N., Štorga, M., Bojčetić, N., & Marjanović, D. (2013). Facilitating design communication through engineering information traceability. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24(6), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaeli, R., Mengoni, M., & Germani, M. (2013). Improving the link between computer-assisted design and configuration tools for the design of mechanical products. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Choi, J.K., Kim, H., & Thurston, D. (2010). Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(9), 1–15.Google Scholar
Rio, M., Reyes, T., & Roucoules, L. (2014). FESTivE: an information system method to improve product designers and environmental experts information exchanges. Journal of Cleaner Production 83, 329–340.Google Scholar
Ross, J.W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D.C. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Russo, D., & Rizzi, C. (2014). Structural optimization strategies to design green products. Computers in Industry 65(3), 470–479.Google Scholar
Sohlenius, G. (1992). Concurrent engineering. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 41(2), 645–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SuPLight. (2014). Sustainable and efficient production of light weight solutions, Report No. FP7-FoF-NMP-2010. Accessed at http://www.suplight-eu.org/ Google Scholar
Terzi, S., Bouras, A., Dutta, D., Garetti, M., & Kiritsis, D. (2010). Product life cycle management—from its history to its new role. International Journal of Product Life Cycle Management 4(4) 360–389.Google Scholar
Theret, J.P., Zwolinski, P., & Mathieux, F. (2011). Integrating CAD, LM and LCA: a new architecture and integration proposal. Proc. Int. Conf. Renewable Energy and Eco-Design in Electrical Engineering—iREED'11, Lille, France, March 23–24.Google Scholar
Tichkiewitch, S., & Brissaud, D. (2003). Methods and Tools for Co-Operative and Integrated Design. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Ullman, D.G. (1997). The Mechanical Design Process, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vallet, F., Millet, D., Eynard, B., Glatard-Mahut, S., Tyl, B., & Bertoluci, G. (2013). Using eco-design tools: an overview of experts’ practice. Design Studies 34(1), 345–377.Google Scholar
Wijngaards, N.J.E., Boonstra, H.M., & Brazier, F.M.T. (2003). The role of trust in distributed design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 17(3), 253–270.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment Development. (1987). Our Common Future—From One Earth to One World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, C.H., Eynard, B., & Roucoules, L. (2009). Interoperability between PLM and RoHS compliance management based on XML and Smart Client. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9(3), 034504.Google Scholar