Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:58:22.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From design experiences to generic mechanisms: Model-based learning in analogical design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Sambasiva R. Bhatta  and
Ashok K. Goel
Sambasiva R. Bhatta
Affiliation:
College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0280, U.S.A.
Ashok K. Goel
Affiliation:
College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0280, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analogical reasoning plays an important role in design. In particular, cross-domain analogies appear to be important in innovative and creative design. However, making cross-domain analogies is hard and often requires abstractions common to the source and target domains. Recent work in case-based design suggests that generic mechanisms are one type of abstractions useful in adapting past designs. However, one important yet unexplored issue is where these generic mechanisms come from. We hypothesize that they are acquired incrementally from design experiences in familiar domains by abstraction over patterns of regularity. Three important issues in abstraction from experiences are what to abstract from an experience, how far to abstract, and what methods to use. In this short paper, we describe how structure-behavior-function models of designs in a familiar domain provide the content, and together with the problem-solving context in which learning occurs, also provide the constraints for learning generic mechanisms from design experiences. In particular, we describe the model-based learning method with a scenario of learning feedback mechanism.

Keywords

AnalogyCased-based ReasoningCausal/Teleological MechanismsDesignModel-based Learning
Type
Research Abstracts
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 10 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Machine learning in design , April 1996 , pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1993). Learning generic mechanisms from experiences for analogical reasoning. Proc. of the Fifteenth Annual Conf. Cog. Sci. Soc., 237–242.Google Scholar
Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1994a). From design experiences to generic mechanisms: Model-based learning in analogical design. Proc. AID'94 Workshop Machine Learning in Design.Google Scholar
Bhatta, S., & Goel, A. (1994b). Discovery of physical principles from design experiences. AI EDAM 8(2), 113–123.Google Scholar
Bylander, T. (1991). A theory of consolidation for reasoning about devices. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 35(4), 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A., & Iwasaki, Y. (1993). Functional representation as design rationale. IEEE Computer, January, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, A. (1989). Integration of case-based reasoning and model-based reasoning for adaptive design problem solving. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Comp. and Info. Sci., The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Michalski, R.S. (1983). A theory and methodology of inductive learning. Artif Intel. 20, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedra, A., & Smith, K. (1991). Microelectronic circuits. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Sembugamoorthy, V., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1986). Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. In Experience, Memory and Reasoning (Kolodner, J. and Riesbeck, C., Eds.), pp. 47–73. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Stroulia, E., & Goel, A. (1992). Generic teleological mechanisms and their use in case adaptation. Proc. Fourteenth Ann. Conf. Cog. Sci. Soc., 319–324.Google Scholar