Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:44:54.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of some computer-based task management approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Antonio Diaz-Calderon  and
Chris Hendrickson
Antonio Diaz-Calderon
Affiliation:
Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
Chris Hendrickson
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institute of Technology and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents an assessment of four management systems to expose the essential characteristics of each management system, including planning techniques, problem representation, concurrency, and flexibility. The experimental part of the research shows that existing management systems can be used to attack a variety of problems. The authors conclude that flexible planning systems are quite beneficial since they can be used to solve a variety of design problems by making small modifications in the definition of their tools.

Keywords

Project ManagementCADTask Management
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 193 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brockman, J.B., Cobourn, T.F., Jacome, M.F., & Director, S.W. (1992). The odyssey CAD framework. In Odyssey CAD framework: Paper collection. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Diaz-Calderon, A. (1993). A comparison of task management approaches for engineering design processes. Master’s Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Fenves, S., Flemming, U., Hendrickson, C., Terk, M., Woodbury, R., & Quadrel, R. (1993). Concurrent, Computer Integrated Building Design. Englewood Heights, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Flemming, U., Coyne, R.F., Glavin, T., Hsi, H., & Rychener, M.D. (1989). A generative expert system for the design of building layouts (final report). Technical Report EDRC-48–15–89. Pittsburgh: Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Garrett, H.J., & Fenves, S.J. (1986). A knowledge-based standards processor for structural component design. Report R-86–157. Pittsburgh: Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Jacome, M.F., & Director, S.W. (1992). Design process management for CAD frameworks. In Odyssey CAD Framework: Paper collection. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Morse, D. (1990). Communication in automated interactive engineering design. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Quadrel, R. (1991). Asynchronous design environments: Architecture and behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Architecture, College of Fine Arts and Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Smith, R.G., & Davis, R. (1981). Framework for cooperation in distributed problem solving. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 1, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talukdar, S.N., & de Souza, P.S. (October, 1992). Scale efficient organizations. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybernet. Chicago.Google Scholar
Terk, M. (1992). A problem-centered approach to creating design environments for facility development. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zozaya-Gorostiza, C.A., Hendrickson, C., & Rehak, D. (1989). Knowledge-Based Process Planning for Construction and Manufacturing. Boston, Academic Press.Google Scholar