Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:46:10.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the design process of a responsive sun-shading system: A case study of designer and user explorations supported by computational tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2015

Rodrigo Velasco*
Affiliation:
Programme of Architecture, Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia Façade Engineering, Frontis3D, Bogotá, Colombia
Rubén Hernández
Affiliation:
Programme of Mechatronics Engineering, Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
Nicolás Marrugo
Affiliation:
Programme of Mechatronics Engineering, Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
César Díaz
Affiliation:
Design Department, Frontis3D, Bogotá, Colombia
*
Reprint requests to: Rodrigo Velasco, Programme of Architecture, Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Carrera 9 #45, Bogotá, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Responding to growing concerns regarding energy-efficient facades, this paper describes the structure and process followed in the design of a responsive sun-shading system based on the use of rotating plates with two degrees of freedom. The proposal considers, among others, the definition of variable design parameters, areas of performance evaluation and control, and construction detailing development represented by a first 1:2 unit (module) model. In the process, computational simulation procedures were employed to explore configurational possibilities that would provide high-performance solutions to the light requirements of the particular covered spaces. In developing the system, it was noticed that due to the highly subjective requirements of users in terms of quantity and quality of lighting, a purely Boolean control system would not always be appropriate. Following from that, and taking advantage of the dynamic nature of the system, a further approach of control supported by fuzzy logic was also implemented at the operative state, whose logic is explained. Digital simulations were carried out to assess the performance of the system, and their results demonstrate more even light distribution levels compared to traditional systems.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dubois, M.-C. (2013). Visual protection devices for architectural applications: key issues and characteristics. Proc. 8th Energy Forum Conf.: Advanced BuildingSkins, pp. 135–140, Bolzano, Italy, November 5–6.Google Scholar
El Sheik, M. (2011). Intelligent building skins: parametric-based algorithm for kinetic facades design and daylighting performance integration. PhD Thesis. University of Southern California, Faculty of the USC School of Architecture. Accessed at http://digitallibrary.usc.eduGoogle Scholar
Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive Architecture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Gomide, F., Gudwin, R., & Tanscheit, R. (1995). Conceitos fundamentais da teoria de conjuntos fuzzy, lógica fuzzy e aplicações. Proc. 6th IFSA Congr. Tutorials, São Paulo, Brazil, July.Google Scholar
Lee, C. (1990). Fuzzy logic in control system: fuzzy logic controller, part I and II. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 20, 404435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomen, R. (2010). Climate adaptive building shells: what can we simulate? MS Thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Moloney, J. (2007). A framework for the design of kinetic façades. Proc. CAAD Futures'07 (Dong, A., Vande Moere, A., & Gero, J.S., Eds.), pp. 461474. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rossi, D., Nagy, Z., & Schlueter, A. (2012). Adaptive distributed robotics for environmental performance, occupant comfort and architectural expression. International Journal of Architectural Computing 10, 341360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. (2011). Morphological principles of kinetic architectural structures. Proc. Adaptive Architecture Conf., pp. 1–12, London, March 3–5.Google Scholar
Tanscheit, R. (1999). Sistemas suzzy. Proc. DEE-PUC-Rio, pp. 2–7, Rio de Janeiro, January.Google Scholar
Thün, G.M., Velikov, K., O'Malley, M., & Sauvé, L. (2012). The agency of responsive envelopes: interaction, politics and interconnected systems. International Journal of Architectural Computing 10(3), 377400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thün, G., & Velikov, K. (2013). Responsive envelopes: bridging environmental response and human interaction. Proc. 8th Energy Forum Conf.: Advanced Building Skins, pp. 317–321, Bolzano, Italy, November 5–6, 2013.Google Scholar
Urquiza, R. (2010). Parametric performative systems: designing a bioclimatic responsive skin. International Journal of Architectural Computing 8(3), 279300.Google Scholar
Velasco, R., Brakke, A.P., & Chavarro, D. (2015). Dynamic facades and computation: towards an inclusive categorization of high performance kinetic façade systems in computer-aided architectural design futures. The next city—new technologies and the future of the built environment. Proc. 16th Int. Conf., CAAD Futures 2015 (Celani, G., Sperling, D.M., & Santos Franco, J.M., Eds.), pp. 172–191. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Vollen, J.O., & Winn, K. (2013). Climate camouflage: advection based adaptive building envelopes. Proc. 8th Energy Forum Conf.: Advanced Building Skins, pp. 305–310, Bolzano, Italy, November 5–6.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. (2008). Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Information Sciences 178(13), 27512779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawidzki, M. (2008). Implementation of cellular automata for dynamic shading of building façade. Proc. ACADIA 2008 Conf., pp. 246–255. Minneapolis, MN, October 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar