Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:53:01.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A methodology of design for affordances using affordance feature repositories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2015

Yong Se Kim
Yong Se Kim*
Affiliation:
Creative Design Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
*
Reprint requests to: Yong Se Kim, Creative Design Institute, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Chunchun Jangan, Suwon, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People interact with artifacts, either products or services, in their lives. These interactions are based on two-way communication between people and artifacts. The characteristics of artifacts that induce natural activities of people, affordances, play critical roles in making interactions successful and meaningful. The notion of affordance features, structural elements of artifacts that provide affordances, has been proposed earlier. In this paper, a methodological framework for design for affordances is proposed where repositories of affordance features are used. Affordances are identified through function–task interaction matrices or use activity observations. Using an affordance feature repository where many alternative structural elements for a specific affordance are stored together with corresponding design constraints and contexts, affordance features for those identified affordances are retrieved considering similarities between the target design constraints and those of the affordance features in the repositories. Using the clues given by such affordance features, a new affordance feature is to be designed through analogical reasoning. We present this design for affordance framework together with illustrative cases where various designers designed affordance features using affordance feature repositories.

Keywords

AffordanceAffordance FeaturesAnalogical ReasoningDesign for Affordance
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 29 , Special Issue 3: Affordances in Design , August 2015 , pp. 307 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouchard, C., Omhover, J.F., Mougenot, C., Aoussat, A., & Westerman, S. (2008). TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition ‘08 (Gero, J.S., & Goel, A., Eds.) Berlin: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Galvao, A.B., & Sato, K. (2005). Affordances in product architecture: linking technical functions and users’ tasks. Proc. ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Long Beach, CA, September 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvao, A.B., & Sato, K. (2006). Incorporating affordances into product architecture: methodology and case study. Proc. ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Philadelphia, PA, September 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Theory of Affordances in the Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kim, M.K., Jeong, J.Y., Kim, Y.S., & Lee, S.W. (2008). Identifying affordance features from user activity study. Int. Conf. Design Computing & Cognition, Atlanta, GA, June 23–25.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Cho, Y.C., & Kim, S.R. (2011). A case study of design for affordance: affordance features of a simple medical device. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED'11). Copenhagen, Denmark: Design Society.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Kim, M.K., & Jeong, J.Y. (2008). Study on personal characteristics and emotional affordances through user activity analysis. Proc. Design and Emotion Conf., Hong Kong, October 6–9.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Kim, M.K., Lee, C.S., Lee, C.H., Lee, S.W., & Lim, J.S. (2007). Affordances in interior design: a case study of affordances in interior design of conference room using enhanced function and task interaction. Proc. ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas, NV, September 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.S., & Lee, S.W. (2011). Service design for product-service systems using context-based activity modeling. Proc. Int. Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR) Conf., Delft, The Netherlands, October 31–November 4.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Lee, S.W., Kim, S.R., Jeong, H., & Kim, J.H. (2012). A product-service systems design method with integration of product elements and service elements using affordances. Proc. Service Design and Innovation Conf., Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Lim, J.S., & Park, J.A. (2009). Affordance feature reasoning: a case study for human–product interaction. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED'09), Stanford, CA: Design Society.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Noh, J.H. & Kim, S.R. (2013). A case study for application of design for affordance methodology using affordance feature repositories. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED'13). Seoul, Korea: Design Society.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.S., Shin, J.W., Kim, S.R., Noh, J.H., & Kim, N.R. (2012). A framework of design for affordances using affordance feature repositories. Proc. ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Chicago, August 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschman, C.F., & Fadel, G.M. (1998). Classifying functions for mechanical design. Journal of Mechanical Design 120(3), 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, J.S. (2011). Affordance feature reasoning for user-centered product design. PhD Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea.Google Scholar
Maier, J.R.A., Ezhilan, T., & Fadel, G.M. (2007). The affordance structure matrix—a concept exploration and attention directing tool for affordance based design. Proc. ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, Las Vegas, NV, September 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, , (2014). Interact. Accessed at http://www.mangold-international.com/software/interactGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T., Cheng, L.M., Higuchi, M., & Yanagisawa, H. (2006). Trial for formulation of affordance feature for product design. Proc. Human Interface Symp., pp. 403–408, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Norman, D.D. (2002). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Stone, R., & Wood, K. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar