Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:00:17.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterizing innovative processes in design spaces through measuring the information entropy of empirical data from protocol studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Jeff W.T. Kan  and
John S. Gero
Jeff W.T. Kan*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Hong Kong
John S. Gero
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and School of Architecture, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
*
Reprint requests to: Jeff W.T. Kan, Independent Scholar, Flat F, 34/F, Block One, Grand View Garden, Diamond Hill, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on a study characterizing design processes and the potential of design spaces through measuring the information entropy of empirical data derived from protocol studies. The sequential segments in a protocol analysis can be related to each other by examining their semantic content producing a design session's linkograph, which defines the design space for a design session. From a linkograph, it is possible to compute the probabilities of the connectivity of each segment for its forelinks and its backlinks, together with the probabilities of distance among links. A linkograph's entropy is a measure of the information in the design session. It is claimed that the entropy of the linkograph measures the potential of the design space being generated as the design proceeds chronologically. We present an approach to the automated construction of linkographs by connecting segments using the lexical database WordNet and measure its entropy. A case study of two design sessions with different characteristics was conducted, one considered more productive and creative, the other more pragmatic. Those segments with high entropy and those associated with high rates of change of entropy are analyzed. The creative session has a higher linkograph entropy. This result indicates the potential of using entropy to characterize a design process.

Keywords

Design ProcessesEntropyInformation AnalysisProtocol Studies
Type
Regular Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 32 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bilda, Z. (2006). The role of externalizations in design: designing in imagery versus sketching . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (Eds.). (1996). Analysing Design Activity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Moisl, H., & Somers, H. (2000). Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, C. (2015). Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, C.M. (1968). Explorations of the Cognitive Processes in Design, Technical Report. Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
El-Haik, B., & Yang, K. (1999). The components of complexity in engineering design. IIE Transactions 31 (10), 925–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J.S. (2011). Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. Journal of Creative Behavior 45 (2), 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Criteria for design evaluation: a process-oriented paradigm. In Evaluating and Predicting Design Performance (Kaley, Y.E., Ed.), pp. 67–79. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies 16 (2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies 26 (6), 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, J.W.T. (2008). Quantitative methods for studying design protocols . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Kan, W.T., & Gero, J.S. (2005). Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing? Proc. CAADRIA'05 (Bhatt, A., Ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 451–457, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Kan, J.W.T., & Gero, J.S. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies 29 (4), 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, J.W.T., & Gero, J.S. (2009). Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information in design protocol studies. In About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings (McDonnell, J., & Lloyd, P., Eds.), pp. 213–229. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S., & Tang, H.-H. (2010). Measuring cognitive design activity changes during an industry team brainstorming session. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition '10 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 621–640. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Khan, W.A., & Angeles, J. (2011). The role of entropy in design theory and methodology. Proc. CDEN/C2E2 2007 Conf., Winnipeg, Canada, July 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krus, P. (2013). Information entropy in the design process. Proc. ICoRD'13 (Chakrabati, A., & Prakash, R.V., Eds.), pp. 101–112. New Delhi: Springer India.Google Scholar
Maher, M.L., Bilda, Z., & Gül, L.F. (2006). Impact of collaborative virtual environments on design behaviour. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition '06 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 305–321. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, J., & Lloyd, P. (Eds.) (2009). About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Popescu, I.-I., Lupea, M., Tatar, D., & Altmann, G. (2015). Quantitative Analysis of Poetic Texts. New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Summers, J.D., & Shah, J.J. (2003). Developing measures of complexity for engineering design. Proc. ASME 2003 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf./Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., pp. 381–392. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
Torres, D.F. (2002). Entropy Text Analyzer. Accessed at http://sweet.ua.pt/delfim/delfim/artigos/entropy.pdf Google Scholar
Tribelsky, E., & Sacks, R. (2010). Measuring information flow in the detailed design of construction projects. Research in Engineering Design 21 (3), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lugt, R. (2003). Relating the quality of the idea generation process to the quality of the resulting design ideas. DS 31: Proc. ICED 03, the 14th Int. Conf. Engineering Design. Stockholm: Design Society.Google Scholar