Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:50:09.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trigger Foods: The Influence of “Irrelevant” Alternatives in School Lunchrooms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Andrew S. Hanks ,
David R. Just  and
Brian Wansink
Andrew S. Hanks
Affiliation:
Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
David R. Just
Affiliation:
Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management and Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs Cornell University
Brian Wansink
Affiliation:
Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Research, Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rational choice theory commonly assumes that the presence of unselected choices cannot impact which among the remaining choices is selected—often referred to as “independence of irrelevant alternatives.” We show that such seemingly irrelevant alternatives influence choice in a school lunch setting. In these lunchrooms, we provide evidence that the presence of specific side dishes—trigger foods—can strongly increase the sales of unhealthy à la carte options, even when the trigger foods are not selected. This behavioral anomaly can be exploited to lead children to healthier choices. We also offer a method that can be used to identify such foods.

Keywords

independence of irrelevant alternativeslinear probability modelchild nutrition programsfood selectionà la carte item
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , April 2012 , pp. 114 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camerer, C.F., and Loewenstein, G. 2004. “Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future.” In Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M., eds., Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caudill, S.B. 1988. “Practitioners Comer: An Advantage of the Linear Probability Model Over Probit or Logit.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 50(4): 425–427.Google Scholar
Faith, M.S., Scanlon, K.S., Birch, L.L., Francis, L.A., and Sherry, B. 2004. “Parent-Child Feeding Strategies and Their Relationships to Child Eating and Weight Status.” Obesity 12(11): 1711–1722.Google Scholar
Fisher, J.O., and Birch, L.L. 1999. “Restricting Access to Palatable Foods Affects Children's Behavioral Response, Food Selection, and Intake.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 69(6): 1264–1272.Google Scholar
Fox, S., Meinen, A., Pesik, M., Landis, M., and Remington, P.L. 2005. “Competitive Food Initiatives in Schools and Overweight in Children: A Review of the Evidence.” Wisconsin Medical Journal-Madson 104(5): 38–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanks, A.S., Just, D.R., Smith, LE., and Wansink, B. 2012. “Healthy Convenience: Nudging Students Toward Healthier Choices in the Lunchroom.” Journal of Public Health 34(1). Available at http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/01/31/pubmed.fds003.short?rss=1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, A.S., Just, D.R., and Wansink, B. 2012. “Total Lunchroom Makeovers: Using Principles of Asymmetric Paternalism to Address New School Lunchroom Guidelines.” Working paper, Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.L., Bargh, J.A., and Brownell, K.D. 2009. “Priming Effects of Television Food Advertising on Eating Behavior.” Health Psychology 28(4): 404–413.Google Scholar
Horrace, W.C., and Oaxaca, R.L. 2006. “Results on the Bias and Inconsistency of Ordinary Least Squares for the Linear Probaiblity Model.” Economic Letters 90(3): 321–327.Google Scholar
Hurley, K.M., Cross, M.B., and Hughes, S.O. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Responsive Feeding and Child Obesity in High-Income Countries.” Journal of Nutrition 141(3): 495–501.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.D., Hartmann, H., de Mul, A., Schuit, A., and Brug, J. 2011. “Economic Incentives and Nutritional Behavior of Children in the School Setting: A Systematic Review.” Nutrition Review 69(11): 660–674.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.L., and Birch, L.L. 1994. “Parents’ and Children's Adiposity and Eating Style.” Pediatrics 94(5): 653–661.Google Scholar
Just, D.R., and Wansink, B. 2009. “Better School Meals on a Budget: Using Behavioral Economics and Food Psychology to Improve Meal Selection.” Choices 24(3): 1–6.Google Scholar
Just, D.R., and Wansink, B. 2011. “The Flat-Rate Pricing Paradox: Conflicting Effects of ‘All-You-Can-Eat’ Buffet Pricing.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93(1): 193–200.Google Scholar
Klaassen, F.J., and Magnus, J.R. 2001. “Are Points in Tennis Independent and Identically Distributed? Evidence from a Dynamic Binary Panel Data Model.” American Statistical Association 96(454): 500–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoferle, K.M., Spangberg, E.R., Herrmann, A., and Landwehr, J.R. 2012. “It Is All in the Mix: The Interactive Effect of Music Tempo and Mode on In-Store Sales.” Marketing Letters 23(1): 325–337.Google Scholar
Lamote, S., Hermans, D., Baeyens, F., and Eelen, P. 2004. “An Exploration of Affective Priming as an Indirect Measure of Food Attitudes.” Appetitie 42(3): 279–286.Google Scholar
Massara, F., Liu, S.S., and Melara, R.D. 2010. “Adapting to a Retail Environment: Modeling Consumer-Environment Interactions.” Journal of Business Research 63(71): 673–681.Google Scholar
Mullahy, J. 1990. “Weighted Least Squares Estimation of the Linear Probability Model, Revisisted.” Economics Letters 32(1): 35–41.Google Scholar
Price, J., and Just, D.R. 2009. “Getting Kids to Eat Their Veggies.” Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists’ 27th Triennial Conference, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Probart, C., McDonnell, E., Hartman, T., Welrich, J.E., and Bailey-Davis, L. 2006. “Factors Associated with the Offering and Sale of Competitive Foods and School Lunch Participation.” Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106(2): 242–247.Google Scholar
Simonson, L., and Tversky, A. 1992. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research 29(3): 281–295.Google Scholar
Smith, L.E., Just, D.R., Wansink, B., and Wallace, C.H. 2011. “Disrupting the Default Choice: The Contentious Case of Chocolate Milk.” Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 25(781.24).Google Scholar
Sorensen, L.B., Moller, P., Flint, A., Martens, M., and Raben, A. 2003. “Effect of Sensory Perception of Foods on Appetite and Food Intake: A Review of Studies on Humans.” International Journal of Obesity 27(10): 1152–1166.Google Scholar
Turley, L.W., and Milliman, R.E. 2000. “Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Business Research 49(2): 193–211.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. “Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs.” Federal Register: Rules and Regulations 77(17): 4088–4167.Google Scholar
Vartanian, L.R., Herman, C.P., and Wansink, B. 2008. “Are We Aware of the External Factors That Influence Our Food Intake?” Health Psychology 27(5): 533–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waksberg, A.J., Smith, A.B., and Burd, M. 2012. “A Model of Decision Making in an Ecologically Realistic Environment: Relative Comparison and the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives.” Journal of Bioeconomics (in press).Google Scholar
Wansink, B. 2004. “Environmental Factors That Increase the Food Intake and Consumption Volume of Unknowing Consumers.” Annual Review of Nutrition 24: 455–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wansink, B., and Just, D.R. 2011. “Healthy Foods First: Students Take the First Lunchroom Food 11% More Often Than the Third.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 43(4): S1.Google Scholar
Wansink, B., Just, D.R., and McKendry, J. 2010. “Lunch Line Redesign.” The New York Times (October 22).Google Scholar
Wansink, B., Payne, C.R., and North, J. 2007. “Fine as North Dakota Wine: Sensory Expectations and the Intake of Companion Foods.” Physiology & Behavior 90(5): 712–716.Google Scholar
Wansink, B., Just, D., and Smith, L.E. 2011a. “Move the Fruit: Putting Fruit in New Bowls and New Places Doubles Lunchroom Sales.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 43(4): S1.Google Scholar
Wansink, B., Just, D., and Smith, L.E. 2011b. “What Is in a Name? Giving Descriptive Names to Vegetables Increases Lunchroom Sales.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 43(4): S1.Google Scholar
Wansink, B., van Ittersum, K., and Painter, J.E. 2005. “How Descriptive Food Names Bias Sensory Perceptions in Restaurants.” Food Quality and Preference 16(5): 393–400.Google Scholar
West, S.E. 2004. “Distributional Effects of Alternative Pollution Control Policies.” Journal of Public Economics 88(3): 735–757.Google Scholar